Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warthog fans rally after Flake revelation
Arizona Daily Independent ^ | August 20, 2013 | Diego Moya

Posted on 08/20/2013 4:01:59 AM PDT by \/\/ayne

A nationwide effort has begun to save the Air Force’s A-10 after Arizona Senator Jeff Flake revealed on the James T. Harris radio show that plans were in place to mothball the craft. Boots on the ground have joined A-10 pilots and crews to save the plane that has frequently saved them.

Fans of the A-10 warthog are circulating a petition in the hopes of gathering 100,000 signatures by September 16. Facebook groups Stand for Protecting Heroes, Keep the A10 in the U.S. Military, and Save the A-10 deployed rapidly in defense of the plane that offers them their best chance of survival in war.

Flake, on a brief visit to Arizona during the Congressional summer recess, was asked by Harris if he would confirm reports that the A-10 was going to be retired. Flake responded that the A-10 would be retired but held out the promise of the F-35 as a viable substitute.

Flake’s candor shocked the Harris’ listeners, many of who work at the nearby Davis Monthan Air Force Base, which is home to the Warthog. The admission sent shockwaves throughout Arizona, and rippled out to the warrior community over the weekend.

(Excerpt) Read more at arizonadailyindependent.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: a10; airforce; f35; flake; warthog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: \/\/ayne

The air force leadership has been trying to kill the Warthog for years.
Back in the ‘90s their master plan was to replace it with the F-16 Fighting Falcon.
They were smugly arrogant about it too.
Claimed that while the ‘Hog was designed to take hits, the Falcon was designed to avoid them...
Idiocy at its best.


21 posted on 08/20/2013 4:55:48 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
When an F-35 can take a SAM THROUGH ITS WING AND BRING ITS PILOT BACK, then I'll be impressed.

When its loiter time is 8+ hours, where the ground crew have to help the pilot out of the cockpit due to fatigue, then I'll be impressed.

When its logistic's foot print and support requirements are less than the A-10’s, then I'll be impressed.

When it can execute the ground support mission BETTER than the A-10, I'll be impressed.

Noe of the above are realizable with that POS.

22 posted on 08/20/2013 5:00:18 AM PDT by Freeport (The proper application of high explosives will remove all obstacles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

The USAF leadership has a favorite refrain: “Big sky, little bullet” Yet, the planes still take hits and the A-10 does that better than any currently in the inventory.


23 posted on 08/20/2013 5:05:41 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: \/\/ayne
The air force has never liked the A-10 (or the CAS mission either). Not "sexy" or glamorous like a fighter. Screw them, it gets the job done in a cost efficient manner. Let army aviation, or even the Marines have 'em. they'll know what to do with 'em.

CC

24 posted on 08/20/2013 5:06:04 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (tease not the dragon for thou art crunchy when roasted and taste good with ketchup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aviator
good... i didn't know any were still flying
25 posted on 08/20/2013 5:09:36 AM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine's brother
...F-100 jack of all trades master of none aircraft

I take exception to that statement!

26 posted on 08/20/2013 5:10:53 AM PDT by Wilum (Never loaded a nuke I didn't like)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: edpc

“The B-52 and C-130 still have roles to play. No reason why the A-10 couldn’t.”

No reason but for administrative indifference?


27 posted on 08/20/2013 5:14:28 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: \/\/ayne

Another important national and regional story broken by Cheesehead turned Tucsonian James T Harris.


28 posted on 08/20/2013 5:14:44 AM PDT by Mygirlsmom (FReepers! Support business that support conservatism. PM me to learn of a good one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freeport; All
A-10 battle damage pic
29 posted on 08/20/2013 5:16:04 AM PDT by ken5050 (CRUZ MISSILE! Ted 2016...aimed directly at the Democrat party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Why have an Airforce in the first place. Tie it to the Army and Navy where it belongs.


30 posted on 08/20/2013 5:25:10 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: caver

Obama’s just trying to help out his friends.


31 posted on 08/20/2013 5:26:08 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

Yes, I recall them pretty much chanting that during the 90’s with that round of idiocy.
They had one officer literally stating “the A-10 is designed to take hits, the F-16 is designed to AVOID them!”
As if that changes the reality of low level flying in flak infested air in the CAS flight bounds.
Mentioned was made of the A-10 being “Ugly” as well.
It boils down to that, every time.
The leadership wants only to field “pretty planes”.


32 posted on 08/20/2013 5:28:02 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine's brother
F-35 is the next F-100

You mean... a Ford pickup?

33 posted on 08/20/2013 5:33:07 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

A-10 pilots call F-16s in a CAS role “lawn darts” for this exact reason. While the F-16 is a beautiful dogfighter, it can’t take a tenth of the punches an A-10 can.


34 posted on 08/20/2013 5:49:50 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

You couldn’t use the F-35 on much of a strafing run since it only carries 180 bullets. I don’t know why they even put a gun in the thing.


35 posted on 08/20/2013 5:57:21 AM PDT by saminfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: \/\/ayne

Give them to the Army. We’ll take them.


36 posted on 08/20/2013 5:57:25 AM PDT by cll (Serviam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

It’s long past time to scrap the 1948 Key West Agreement (http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_West_Agreement) which was in aid of the newly formed US Air Force. Navy was allowed to keep their air arm while the Army surrended all but recon and medical aircraft. There have been some modifications to the agreement, but the world and technology have changed dramatically since 1948.

All tactical combat air support assets and personnel needed to be released to direct and immediate control of ground troop commanders. The fast pace of asymetric warfare cannot not tolerate the lag time inherent in CAS requests. The Op-forces we are facing now do not have massive base camps or formations of the USSR.

There needs to be a critical re-thinking of command and control of combined arms in terms of the conflicts we now face.


37 posted on 08/20/2013 5:57:48 AM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor

Yes, but it won’t happen.
The insular and heavily politicized leadership will never admit there is s problem unless forced to.


38 posted on 08/20/2013 6:04:38 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: saminfl

Thanks for mentioning that... The ammo capacity of the 20mm F35 cannon is puny. Only enough for a few well aimed bursts. It doesn’t begin to compare with the hitting power of the GAU cannon on the Hog, either.

Lets face it: left to themselves air forces like to plan to fight other air forces. CAS is the very last mission that gets any real attention. But when you think about it it’s one of the primary reasons that air forces evolved in the first place!


39 posted on 08/20/2013 6:11:18 AM PDT by Tallguy (Hunkered down in Pennsylvania)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: \/\/ayne

If they can keep the BUFFs airborne and effective as long as they have, seems the Warthogs outta get their chance.


40 posted on 08/20/2013 6:21:32 AM PDT by grobdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson