Posted on 08/25/2013 1:01:37 PM PDT by lowbridge
Think its odd that a 30-year-old male Hong Kong national punched a 78-year-old female abortion protestor in the back, then calmly walked down the street without uttering a word?
Just wait until you watch the video of what happened after the assault in Iowa City.
But first, lets review what we know so far.
Man Chun John Ma stands 6-feet 1-inches and weighs 200 pounds, hails from Hong Kong, and is a graduate student in the genetics program at the University of Iowa.
According to Donna Holman, she was holding an anti-abortion sign near a Planned Parenthood office on Wednesday morning when the man approached her from behind and struck her in the shoulder.
The blow knocked her forward, Holman said, causing her to drop literature shed been holding, and Ma continued walking down the street, never saying a thing.
Holman immediately activated her walkie-talkie and called her husband Dan, who was protesting about two blocks away. Dan Holman turned on his video camera and tracked down Ma, filming his verbal confrontation with the remarkably placid perp until police arrived.
When a winded Holman asks Ma if he hit is wife, Ma replies on camera, Sorry about that
I know Im in trouble. Later he admits to the arresting officer, I did punch her
that was probably wrong.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
Being from Hong Kong, he'd have no personal experience of Chinese cops.
If it would have been a black perp Holman would never caught up with him, howver on the off chance that he did he would have received a cracka beatdown or shot.
bump
I know several high ranking black belts in their late 50's or early 60's who could get away with it, but the average Joe should not get physical with a young man.
That's why there are Glocks.
When seconds count, L/E is only minutes away. Wouldn't need L/E for this.
God Bless Gaston Glock!
I understand your sarcasm and I agree with you but after watching that entire stupid video of shaking buildings and the final argument with the cop at the end, I didn't see where any little old lady was beaten up. Did I miss something?
My take is that Holman should have shut up after the 15th minute as the cop was already explaining that he agreed with Holman’s beliefs but Holman kept reiterating his politics repeatedly as I watched the entire video. I think the cop got it but was in a bind.
Holman got what was correct: the Chinese guy is going to jail over the assault. Case closed. Holman should have asked the cop “where do i file a police report?” You’d think someone who claims he and his wife whose signs were cut and were doused with water’ (based on their experience) should have learned how to deal with the repercussions should know the next step but he kept going on and on about the babies etc.
The brainwashed Useful Idiot cop is “offended” because he doesn’t understand why the picture of the cut up baby “offends” him.If he had free thought he would understand that it is WRONG and MURDER to kill the unborn or after born. Way back THEY said that they would only get rid of “a few cells” that weren’t even alive or humn yet. THEY wouldNEVER kill a WHOLE LIVING BABAY”. Well, THEY LIED! It was only a trick to destroy America through making us immoral Murder Machine Monsters, OF OUR OWN.
after watching that entire stupid video of shaking buildings and the final argument with the cop at the end, I didn't see where any little old lady was beaten up. Did I miss something?
Yes. The article starts:
Think its odd that a 30-year-old male Hong Kong national punched a 78-year-old female abortion protestor in the back, then calmly walked down the street without uttering a word?
That part may not have been filmed.
This happened to someone in 2008 who refused to sign a petition in favor of BO at some card table outside a grocery store.
You obviously watched a different video than what was embedded in the story as your comment has no relationship to what was filmed.
Actually, I did. How exactly was my comment different or relevant to what I watched?
All he kept asking was why the guy did it, only speaking to the cop for a few minutes.
The cop said "You know why he did it, he didn't like the sign. I don't like the sign. You were trying to provoke a response like this." (Not exact but close).
He did not, up to that say that he agreed with them at all and Holman didn't bring up abortion at all that I recall, up to that point.
I stopped watching at that point as I had a call at work.
“Holman didn’t bring up abortion at all that I recall, up to that point.”
He did..repeatedly, even saying “what do you think about the unborn babies” to the cop, whom by voice alone, was getting irritated. The video is one long one that should have ended with the cop doing his job after he took the Chi dude’s ID. Why Holman asked the Chi guy why he did it was the one that prolonged the video.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
it’s more than 2:29 minutes long, ya know?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.