Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/27/2013 3:52:58 PM PDT by mulder1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mulder1

So, Obama launches some cruise missiles into Syria at empty targets.

Syria retaliates by sinking one of our ships.

Support for intervention in Syria goes up to 80%.

Obama gets his war.


2 posted on 08/27/2013 3:57:19 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1

Iranian news service.


3 posted on 08/27/2013 3:57:44 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1

Obama has a goal. Wreck our military


4 posted on 08/27/2013 3:57:49 PM PDT by silentknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1

Imagine if one of those Russian missiles was fired from Assad territory and hit a Russian ship. Attn: CIA.


5 posted on 08/27/2013 3:59:33 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (The best War on Terror News is at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1

we should stay away from Syria, let the Israelis deal with them.


6 posted on 08/27/2013 3:59:40 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1

If one of our ships is sunk, I think most Americans will be totally P-O’d that the _resident put our people at risk for no good reason.


8 posted on 08/27/2013 4:01:52 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( ==> sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1

If Obama attacks, Syria said it will attack Israel. Doubtful that Iron Dome can stop state of the art missiles fired from Syrian bunkers. If they are armed with gas, WW III will begin. That is the catastrophe the Russians are fearing. US Navy ships should be able to protect themselves. Obama had better think long and hard before he starts something he can’t stop.


9 posted on 08/27/2013 4:02:46 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1

The only smart answer in Syria is to stand back, point at Islamics killing each other and say, ‘See? This is what the religion of peace breeds; chemical warfare against civilians for points.’

Of course, the reason why the ‘rebels’ gassed their own people is that the chemical weapons were free, and the US would spend billions in missiles to launch at Syria’s present government, their ‘enemy.’ Even better than strapping a bomb onto a teenager.


10 posted on 08/27/2013 4:02:52 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1

300 km range on the ASMs... vs double or triple that (easily with mid-air refueling) combat radius of F/A-18s. Hmm, I like the US Navy’s chances - if odumber lets them off the chain. Personally, I’d rather just stay out of it.


11 posted on 08/27/2013 4:04:52 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1
Iskandar high-precision ballistic missiles

Time to fire up the wave-motion gun

12 posted on 08/27/2013 4:05:52 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1

Question:

If the ship were to park outside the range of the missiles and completely level Damascus, wouldn’t that be the end of it?


13 posted on 08/27/2013 4:08:35 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1

Threat? Against Aegis? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


15 posted on 08/27/2013 4:10:16 PM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1
...reminding that the American military vessels are not equipped with any weapons system to intercept or divert the Syrian anti-ship missiles.

Whilst this line is utterly BS, it is rather irrelevant given that any first strike launch would likely be from US Submarines, and Syria has ZERO ASW capability.
18 posted on 08/27/2013 4:13:43 PM PDT by rottndog ('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1

What’s a gay task force commander to do? Follow orders from the gay islamist in Chief?


21 posted on 08/27/2013 4:15:08 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1
Seems Israel knew how to work around the Yakhont only a few weeks ago.
25 posted on 08/27/2013 4:18:15 PM PDT by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1

The Russians are also in Syria sitting in their port... They have the SS-N-22 Sunburn, it has been called “the most lethal missile in the world today.”

Iran also has these, perhaps Syria as well.
Never underestimate the other side.

The Sunburn can deliver a 200-kiloton nuclear payload or a 750-pound conventional warhead, within a range of 100 miles, more than twice the range of the Exocet. The Sunburn combines a Mach 2.1 speed (two times the speed of sound) with a flight pattern that hugs the deck and includes “violent end maneuvers” to elude enemy defenses. The missile was specifically designed to defeat the US Aegis radar defense system. Should a US Navy Phalanx point defense somehow manage to detect an incoming Sunburn missile, the system has only seconds to calculate a fire solution not enough time to take out the intruding missile. The US Phalanx defense employs a six-barreled gun that fires 3,000 depleted-uranium rounds a minute, but the gun must have precise coordinates to destroy an intruder “just in time.”

The Sunburn’s combined supersonic speed and payload size produce tremendous kinetic energy on impact, with devastating consequences for ship and crew. A single one of these missiles can sink a large warship, yet costs considerably less than a fighter jet. Although the Navy has been phasing out the older Phalanx defense system, its replacement, known as the Rolling Action Missile (RAM) has never been tested against the weapon it seems destined to one day face in combat.


30 posted on 08/27/2013 4:26:45 PM PDT by Bobalu (It is not obama we are fighting, it is the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1

More about the Sunburn missile
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/09/the-sunburn-missile-the-weapon-that-could-defeat-the-us-in-the-gulf-2467754.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS-N-22


36 posted on 08/27/2013 4:38:00 PM PDT by Bobalu (It is not obama we are fighting, it is the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1

obozo is doing all he can to deplete US military power and if the US Navy loses a few ships and some sailors over an attack on Syria, the obozo will be doing a victory dance.


37 posted on 08/27/2013 4:41:26 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Iskandar missiles? Where did they get these things???? The Gamelons???


43 posted on 08/27/2013 4:54:56 PM PDT by Kolath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mulder1
The P-800 Oniks, also known in export markets as Yakhont (in English means ruby or sapphire), is a Russian/Soviet supersonic anti-ship cruise missile developed by NPO Mashinostroyeniya as a ramjet version of P-80 Zubr. The missile has a range of 300 kilometers.

The Tomahawk cruise missile has a range of 800 to 1550 miles. As long as our ships stay outside the range of the P-800, they are in no danger.

57 posted on 08/27/2013 9:37:23 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson