Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pollution rule hurts coal, helps other sources
Associated Press ^ | Sep 21, 2013 12:03 AM EDT | Jonathan Fahey

Posted on 09/20/2013 9:29:48 PM PDT by Olog-hai

Tough new limits on the amount of heat-trapping emissions new power plants can emit will likely accelerate a shift away from coal-fired power and toward electricity generated with natural gas, wind, and sunshine.

Power prices for homes, businesses and factories may eventually rise, and nuclear power could return to fashion.

The rule proposed by the Obama administration Friday will have little effect on the mix of power sources and electricity prices anytime soon because it only applies to new power plants and is likely to be challenged in court. …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechangehoax; coal; emissions; epa; globalwarminghoax; liberalagenda; necessarilyskyrocket; obama

1 posted on 09/20/2013 9:29:48 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Wonder what heat trapping emissions they are?


2 posted on 09/20/2013 9:48:53 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
By comparison, natural gas-fired plants, which emit half as much carbon dioxide as coal plants, along with wind turbines and solar panels, will look like a bargain.

This is only true if wind turbines and solar continue to be government subsidized and forced upon the utilities.

3 posted on 09/20/2013 10:13:15 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Is he against coal because it’s black?


4 posted on 09/20/2013 10:14:21 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the mainland US There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nuc 1.1

Greenhouse gases....predominately carbon dioxide. Also water vapors, methane, ozone. They absorb infrared heat like a sponge and trap it in the atmosphere....the greenhouse effect. Causes the atmosphere to heat up and melts the icecaps.....but it also causes plants/trees to grow faster because they use CO2 in photosynthesis....this creates more water vapor/rain and so on...

The more CO2 the faster plants, trees, algae, etc grow....when they die the keep the C02 trapped in them...they become coal over eons, decompose and become methane, etc.

When coal and oil is burned it releases all the trapped C02 back into the atmosphere.....cycle begins again. We are releasing more C02 than is being banked by the plants.

That is the narrative. It is true...but fast vegetative growth is good. We eat them and build houses from them. Rain is good. Warm weather is....well, good.

They make it bad to attack coal. To restrict the use of coal weakens and impoverishes America. Just like preventing domestic oil development.

That is the end game. Weaken the US and deny her use of her own resources.

The enviro whackos are just useful idiots used by the internationalists. They are no different that the 1960’s anti-war protesters and 70’s and 80’s nuke disarmament morons. Pawns in the great game.


5 posted on 09/20/2013 10:17:28 PM PDT by Lowell1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
One thing ignored by the article in costing a new gas powered plant is the cost of a new pipeline to fuel that plant.

Yes a gas power plant is much cheaper to build than a coal powered plant but new coal plants are usually built on the same site as existing plants if possible to take advantage of the pre-existing rail and power lines.

My electric utility recently studied the viability of sighting a new gas plant on the site of soon to be decommissioned coal plant to take advantage of the power lines and other pre-existing necessities.

The study determined that the cost of building a new 16 inch gas pipe line 50 miles long would be prohibitive. Not mention of overcoming the NIMBY law suites.

6 posted on 09/20/2013 10:24:06 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nuc 1.1

As I’ve mentioned, Obama has not just done damage over the last 5 years, or will do it for the next three years, he’s done very long term damage to the economy. No business in their right mind will ever build a coal plant again. No financial institutions would finance it anyway. Even if a miracle happened and a real conservative was elected in 2016, these people think in much longer terms. Another Obama, or even worse, is never more than four years away.

Also, the auto manufacturers are already working on the engines and technologies of 2020 and beyond, based on the MPG rules demanded by Obama and his buds. These will not be cheap and, the price of aluminum, which is certain to be used more in vehicles, is heavily tied to the price of electricity. I’d expect to be paying 40-45K in 2013 dollars for an average gas-powered car by then. If not for the cost of the car itself, then to subsidize the electric car buyers so that consumers will buy more of them, satisfying the CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) rules.

These realities are baked-in, and not much can be do to fix them.


7 posted on 09/20/2013 10:27:30 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac; Olog-hai
The study determined that the cost of building a new 16 inchgas pipe line 50 miles long would be prohibitive. Not mention of overcoming the NIMBY law suites.

OOPs that should be a 60 inch pipe line.

8 posted on 09/20/2013 10:30:44 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775

Thank you for the reply. I was being rhetorical, and a bit sarcastic. Your reply is well written and I agree with your conclusion. Too bad for them the globe is not warming. One other thing, the oceans are grate CO2 sponges.


9 posted on 09/20/2013 10:32:42 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

You have the right of it. However, repealing CAFE Standards is simple and will be done as soon as people are being forced onto buses because they cannot afford cars. Oil and gas will be opened up immediately once the dims are out of power. Coal soon thereafter. Hope I am right. We will see.


10 posted on 09/20/2013 10:43:59 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nuc 1.1

“You have the right of it. However, repealing CAFE Standards is simple and will be done as soon as people are being forced onto buses because they cannot afford cars. Oil and gas will be opened up immediately once the dims are out of power. Coal soon thereafter. Hope I am right. We will see.”

So do I, but the carmakers are already committing a great deal of money to these technologies and techniques and they certainly will use them and get returns on the designs and products, needed or not.


11 posted on 09/20/2013 10:54:51 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

Café standards forced a lot of people into Pick-up trucks.

Then the people in the pick- up trucks wanted style and features.

The work truck of yesterday that sold for less than a car has been transformed into a luxury vehicle with leather heated seats rugs on the floor electric windows, Diesel engine, 4 wheel drive an entertainment system, and a cost of $60,000 dollars.

I want a truck with wind-up windows, rubber floor mats,V-8 power, and it doesn’t even need a radio. Somewhere in the price range of $17,000 dollars.


12 posted on 09/21/2013 3:12:52 AM PDT by Venturer ( cowardice posturing as tolerance =political correctness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nuc 1.1

ONLY if a conservative like maybe a Rick Perry or Ted Cruz is elected.....a squishy Republican won’t do it......never mind a Squishy Republican will never get elected!


13 posted on 09/21/2013 4:58:48 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Hey West Virginia, you fools just keep electing scum like Manchin that say one thing but in reality are waaaay up obammy’s ass.
Good luck trying to give all your coal away.


14 posted on 09/21/2013 5:33:08 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) ( Hey Rubio, eat pooh pal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson