Posted on 10/09/2013 4:05:44 PM PDT by mdittmar
If the US gov-mint defaults, does this mean I don’t have to pay all my bills when they do not send me my military retired pay and my socialized security check?
When has that stopped him?
There is, in fact, no such thing as "martial law" in the United States.
As we watch the NPS close our national monuments and parks, locking the porta potties, removing the handles from water pumps/fountains.
Oh, I don't doubt that "Obama" would try it - that he is, in fact, itching to try it.
But, under what TASS would call the present "correlation of forces", we are losing. I don't think there is any serious chance that the forces of communism are now going to be stopped without war.
If "Obama" can be made to roll the dice, our chances in the game we are now losing will improve. Maybe not a lot, but they will improve.
That’d have been a hell of a lot easier if the House/GOP/RNC had been on the Senate’s/Reid ass about a BUDGET.
Unfort. even the GOP wanted more funny $$ to blow through.
There already seems to be a meme along the lines of, will we choose to pay foreign investors over our seniors, veterans, etc.?
So don’t assume automatically that our government won’t choose to default.
couldn’t have said it better...this is just more disinformation to scare the masses and the markets
Or if the gov-mint defaults does it mean that China forecloses on Wyoming, New Mexico, Florida and Colorado?
Thanks mdittmar.
Yellen hints at boosting inflation to create jobs (Obama’s Federal Reserve chairwoman nominee)
The Daily Caller | October 9, 2013 | Tim Cavanaugh, executive editor
Posted on 10/09/2013 3:13:15 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3076899/posts
Jonathan Jarvis: 0bama’s henchman at the National Park Service
Department of the Interior | 10 Oct 2013 | Department of the Interior
Posted on 10/10/2013 3:21:28 PM PDT by citizen
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3077386/posts
What Lew and his beloved Obozo are concerned about is the possible lack of payments to their voters, who depend on welfare.
Obama and the Democrats were hoping that the rise in revenue would be enough enable them to justify their projected levels of spending. Ironically, the sequester has made that half-way pausible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.