Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A black box in your car? Some see a source of tax revenue
Los Angeles Times ^ | October 26, 2013 | By Evan Halper

Posted on 10/27/2013 5:45:21 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: Freeport
The cash for clunkers program helped in removing the supply of older cars from the market, scrapped
61 posted on 10/27/2013 11:59:13 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Would the fuel taxes be repealed?

No.


62 posted on 10/27/2013 12:01:31 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

Would the fuel taxes be repealed?

No.

You would get taxed twice. Once for the amount of fuel. Then for the amount of miles driven.


63 posted on 10/27/2013 12:05:15 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

This one is easy. Every state requires annual inspections. In NY the mileage is recorded and transmitted to DMV along with the emissions report. A little 3rd grade arithmetic and you have the mileage for that car.absolutely no need for a black box continually feeding GPS data to big brother.one problem with the concept. Say I live in Pa. and work in Queens.Most of my driving is on Jersey roads but Pa gets the tax money.I see this as a counter by the Progessives to my very simple scheme.


64 posted on 10/27/2013 12:06:29 PM PDT by xkaydet65 (.You have never tasted freedom, else you would know it is purchased not with gold but with steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

Agenda 21, nudge masses into consolidated smaller housing, mass transit.


65 posted on 10/27/2013 12:11:46 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

We have a fuel tax for roads. If you drive more you get taxed more because you use more fuel. Heavy trucks that do the most damage to roads also pay more in taxes for roads since they use more fuel.
This black box thing is about Agenda 21. Move (nudge) people out of the rural and suburbs and into the cities where they can be controlled


66 posted on 10/27/2013 12:25:08 PM PDT by weston (As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

“It’s really getting closer to the time for pitchforks and torches.”

In 2013 it would be locked & loaded, C4, hack attacks and sabotage.

There’s far to many idiots in government.


67 posted on 10/27/2013 12:36:53 PM PDT by maddog55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

there seems to be some technical difficulties with my box...

68 posted on 10/27/2013 1:25:31 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

What’s wrong with building a tamper-proof odometer and making tampering with one a RICO-eligible felony with a minimum 10-year prison term?
*************************************
I drive A LOT of miles , I have had odometers fail ,, odometer alteration is already a federal offense but I understand at least 30% of used cars have their odometers altered by used car dealers ... the electronic ones are the easiest to change ... in fact cars shipped between the US and Canada (for sale) must have their odometers altered by law from/to miles/kilometers and the reading reset to match.. you can find dozens of odometer shops that will do it for you near the border .. or just mail your odometer to dashpro.com

You can always visit a junkyard and buy a gauge cluster with a lower mileage showing.


69 posted on 10/27/2013 1:28:06 PM PDT by Neidermeyer (I used to be disgusted , now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: weston

Federal fuel tax per gallon:
18.4 cents = gasoline
24.4 cents = diesel

States vary all over the map on their charges.
States plus Federal numbers:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_taxes_in_the_United_States


70 posted on 10/27/2013 1:37:18 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
What compelling State interest requires the State to know anything at all about the mileage you freely choose to put on your car?

The same compelling interest the relevant billing entities have in knowing how much electricity or water you use. Like electricity and water, road maintenance costs money, and unless your car flies to its destination, it imposes wear-and-tear on roads, which directly affects maintenance costs. Maybe you'd be more comfortable having roads maintained by some private entity (and that would be fine by me), but the bottom line is that somebody needs to pay for road maintenance, and odometer readings, which are taken during annual vehicle inspections (in states that have them) are a reasonable way of finding out how much wear and tear (and therefore cost) a given car has imposed on the roads.

71 posted on 10/27/2013 3:00:04 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

It would seem to me a tire tax would be the best way of handling the issue.


72 posted on 10/27/2013 3:00:40 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar again if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Which will be yet another reason to maintain/refurbish older vehicles.


73 posted on 10/27/2013 3:10:22 PM PDT by MSF BU (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
It would seem to me a tire tax would be the best way of handling the issue.

Retreads would make a startling comeback. What was old would become new again. I find the idea of making tire refurbishment illegal - which is what it would take to prevent mileage tax evasion - pretty amusing.

74 posted on 10/27/2013 3:11:09 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Nah, you’d tax recapping too... I mean there could be stealth recapping, but stealth anything is the risk of taxation. A tax doesn’t need to be perfect to be useful. Tie the tax to the rated tread life.


75 posted on 10/27/2013 3:16:49 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar again if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Don’t know how old you are, but here goes.

Gasoline taxes, Federal, state and maybe local were emplaced specifically for road maintenance and repair. The drives thus paid for the “use” and upkeep of roadways built usually by public bonds. And for decades this worked fairly well albeit with the usual graft involved in such civic projects. Those taxes were not part of the general fund.

So the gasoline/diesl already taxes the user based on the drivers usage and fuel consumption. Low mpg vehicles pay the premium for the necessity or need of the high consumption.

The pols are playing three card Monte with the usual semi-literate and disengaged populous. You actually can fool most of the people most of the time, even here on FR.

Have a good evening.


76 posted on 10/27/2013 3:29:18 PM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU
Which will be yet another reason to maintain/refurbish older vehicles.

We're going to look more and more like Cuba - what with the health care and the old 1950s cars...

77 posted on 10/27/2013 3:45:41 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor
So the gasoline/diesl already taxes the user based on the drivers usage and fuel consumption. Low mpg vehicles pay the premium for the necessity or need of the high consumption.

This isn't news to me. The problem we have today is the increasing presence of EV's and hybrids, which decrease fuel usage (and thus, fuel tax payments) without decreasing road wear. Then there's the potential for the large scale adoption of CNG vehicles in the decade ahead. Ultimately, the gasoline tax will have to be reduced or scrapped in exchange for something that doesn't ignore the effect of non-gasoline burning road users.

78 posted on 10/27/2013 3:49:43 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Some see” means “we see” to the commie media.


79 posted on 10/27/2013 4:19:33 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
and here i thought the GAS TAXES where what you paid to drive by the mile...
80 posted on 10/27/2013 4:21:55 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson