“which is a society free of discrimination,”
Why don’t you start with the IRS, you piece of crap!
How out of touch can you be, Tom Harkin?
So we are protecting everyone except Heterosexual Christians?
What about orthogonal genders?
...until Obama give Boehner his marching orders and he sheds a tear on camera.
How about giving people independent choice in health care? Harkin is playing a game of distraction.
Not too many years ago, one of the male employees decided he was a female. Management was not willing to let him use the female restroom out of fear of what could happen if the ladies rightly complained. Nor could they suggest he couldn't out of fear of what could happen on the legal front.
The "solution" was to convert the visitor's ladies lounge into a private privy for "it."
Then, when there was an occasional female visitor which needed to use the facilities, she was ushered back to the employee restroom since these stupid "rights" did not apply to visitors, only employees.
Consider the inconvenience just to accommodate a single "it" in the plant.
Good old Tom, the administration needs distraction and a change of conversation and he comes up with this. It’s almost like they preplanned it.
According to liberals, no one should ever take offense to freaks and hire them no matter what. So what if some freak male likes to sit in the girl’s bathroom to pee, or rape young boys in the butt, or mutilate himself and have a cutoffadicktomy, or wear women’s clothing, or marry his dog? We’re not to judge, but to accept.
However, liberals DO NOT ACCEPT RELIGION, FAITH, CHRISTIANS, OR ANY RELIGION AT ALL. They do love Muslims because Muslims are violent towards Jews and Christians.
Liberals are violent and must be stopped!
“The U.S. Senate is set to vote on the bill tonight. Reports say the bill is not expected to be brought up for a vote in the U.S. House.”
I thought queers, fags, homos, dykes and all other manner of freaks were already “protected”. Dare I ask what else there is?
I wish bonehead would pull a reed on this kind of krap.
I hope a halfway house of transgenders moves right next door to the good Senator.
I wish the same sort of thing would happen with illegals moving next door to Congressmen supporting amnesty.
However, this won’t happen as these “special people” live in gated communities well-protected and shielded from the social ills they encourage with their legislation.
I have always wanted to know why we can’t dicriminate against behavior, esp. degenerate, self-destructive behavior?
In other words - do not expect to freely practice your religion if it objects to homosexual behavior.
See, balanced budgets are not hard.
:-)