Hell no...not a chance.
Only for the purpose of getting the next candidate nominated.
Did Nazism survive without Hitler?
There is a need to tie Obama to Progressivism so tightly that when one goes down the other will too. ObamaCare = HillaryCare = Universal Healthcare. They are one in the same and they are all failures.
Long but great read.
The hidden obvious part of this article is the direct comparison of Obama to Stalin, without a hint of drama.
Oprah is working hard to make sure that doesn’t happen...
They ought to yank him like a rotten tooth. Are they smart enough to actually do it? Nope.
Excellent article.
The money quote at the end of this well written article:
*******************************************************
“The turn against Obama will be contingent and temporary, and will in no way hinder his future career as the ultimate celebrity ex-president — America’s Historic First Ever Cool Cokehead Completely Fabricated LGBT Community-Organizing Contraceptive-Dispensing Communist-in-Chief.”
******************************************************
But by then he will have done so much damage it will take more than 20 years for America to repair it. By then I will be dead.Thats why I and thousands like me have became ex pats.
Very good article. I’d almost call it a “must read.” Thanks for posting.
No, next question.
My first reaction to this question is no.
The establishment can’t throw Obama under the bus because of the race card. Progressives can’t afford to alienate blacks from the political process because blacks make up a significant amount of the left wing voting bloc. Get rid of Obama and blacks may become disillusioned with politics and stay home on election day.
I think the answer here is 0bama won’t fade away as much as we’d like for the very racist reason of his being ‘black.’ The same reason he got elected, political correctness, will be a stumbling block to the progressives being able to remove him or at least minimize him in the American psyche. Essentially they would need to create a picture of failure in policy without it appearing as a total smear campaign.
This then becomes the realm of the useful idiot. I totally agree with the article’s premise about their dedication to the cause, but maintain that dedication may very well be their undoing. They would have to let the totalitarian mask slip and I’m not sure they can do that in the case of 0bama.
Sadly, truly sadly, this means 0bama may not survive his office. The lower his approval ratings the more his life is in danger from the inside. Again, the ruthlessness of the ideologues will prevail against anything that stands in the way. We are entering a very dangerous time.
“Apologists for Stalin’s Russia were reluctant to admit that their hero was a bloodthirsty tyrant. However, when the state-controlled press and a complicit Western intelligentsia were unable to suppress the truth any longer, even those apologists turned on him ...”
No, they did not! They never turned on Stalin, he died, and they changed the subject (to Fidel and Mao among others).
My take:
Baraq is safely in until Jan 17.
The MSM can use that time to take some shots to buff their cred as “objective”
And work on the new plan
“Baraq had great ideas but was an inexperienced manager. Hillary is who we need to take those ideas forward.”
The Republicans on the other hand almost never unite behind one idea or one candidate.
Witness the continual bickering among Freepers over who is more conservative than who, rather than trying to fight the common enemy.
In fact, I’d say this website is full of Republicans in Name Only because their allegiance is not to a ‘big tent’ party but to their own definition of a ‘true conservative’.
The early 20th century American social critic and humorist H. L. Mencken, known for his “definitions” of terms, defined a demagogue as “one who will preach doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.”