To: Red in Blue PA
"It was part of a government research study aimed at determining the number of drunken or drug-impaired drivers."
I don't believe this at all. Saliva tests are not generally recognised tests for substance impairment. This was an effort to collect DNA samples for a database, straight up.
To: circlecity
When they “ask” just say FU.
6 posted on
11/20/2013 6:04:42 AM PST by
Mouton
(The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
To: circlecity
We use saliva alcohol tests to screen for alcohol all the time. If they’re negative there is no need to further test.
9 posted on
11/20/2013 6:06:29 AM PST by
nikos1121
To: circlecity
They’re checking how far citizens can be pushed....
22 posted on
11/20/2013 6:19:19 AM PST by
GOPJ
(Was Obama giving nucluear information and equipment to Iran - through Benghazi?)
To: circlecity
I would have refused, and then sued afterwards if my license was taken away. You’re correct. DNA data base and massive invasion of privacy. The test they ostensibly were looking at was for alcohol - you don’t need saliva and blood for that.
25 posted on
11/20/2013 6:24:50 AM PST by
Gaffer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson