Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Democratic) Older hill aides shocked by Obamacare prices [Waah alert!]
Politico ^ | 11/21/2013 | Jonathan Allen and Jennifer Haberkorn

Posted on 11/21/2013 6:01:22 PM PST by markomalley

Veteran House Democratic aides are sick over the insurance prices they’ll pay under Obamacare, and they’re scrambling to find a cure.

“In a shock to the system, the older staff in my office (folks over 59) have now found out their personal health insurance costs (even with the government contribution) have gone up 3-4 times what they were paying before,” Minh Ta, chief of staff to Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wis.), wrote to fellow Democratic chiefs of staff in an email message obtained by POLITICO. “Simply unacceptable.”

In the email, Ta noted that older congressional staffs may leave their jobs because of the change to their health insurance.

Under the Affordable Care Act, and federal regulations, many congressional staffers — designated as “official” aides — were forced to move out of the old heavily subsidized Federal Employees Health Benefits program and into the District of Columbia’s health insurance marketplace exchange. Others designated as “unofficial” were allowed to stay in the FEHB program. Managers had to choose whether aides were “official” or “unofficial” by Oct. 31, and Ta said that wasn’t enough time to make an informed decision about who would benefit and who would lose out by going into the new system.

Moore’s office was one of those in which all staff were designated as “official” and pushed into the exchanges. That ended up being a problem for older staff, who weren’t accustomed to paying higher premiums because of their age.

But age is one of the few factors insurers can use to adjust prices under Obamacare — and older people will often pay much more than younger people.

For instance, the premiums for gold-level Aetna HMO plans in D.C. cost an average of $684.40 per month for a 55-year-old. A similar plan would cost an average of $287.11 for a 27-year-old. The gold-level CareFirst HMO plans have an average premium of $573.07 for a 55-year-old — more than double the $240.41 average for 27-year-olds. That’s before the federal employee contribution toward the premium.

In an interview with POLITICO, Ta emphasized that “employees are not dissatisfied with the Affordable Care Act” and that some younger staffers have seen their premiums fall. But, he noted, congressional aides are treated differently now than other federal employees, and he would like to be able to offer the best health insurance option available to his employees — even if that means some of them are covered under the old system and others jump into the exchanges.

He wrote in his email that he had asked Democratic staff on the House Administration Committee whether she could redesignate some of the aides on Moore’s payroll as nonofficial office staff so that they could avoid the exchange and keep their FEHB plans.

“So far the answer is no, and that we have the opportunity next year to redesignate staff,” Ta wrote. “I am asking for a solution now though because I will lose staff in my office because of this snafu and I mentioned to payroll and House Admin[istration Committee] that it was unfair for our offices to make this designation without allowing our staff the ability [to] actually go on the DCshop to compare rates. I would have made a different decision on the designation of my older staff.”

Ta concluded by asking other chiefs of staff to join him in petitioning the Administration Committee for an immediate fix. Glenn Rushing, chief of staff to Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, quickly replied to the group that he would join the fight.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: ageism; democraticaides; incometax; obamacare; obamarecession; obamataxhikes; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: markomalley

wow


21 posted on 11/21/2013 6:26:22 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“snafu” my rear end


22 posted on 11/21/2013 6:27:32 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

23 posted on 11/21/2013 6:31:06 PM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Suckers!

If you voted for it you deserve it!

Eat Your Peas!

24 posted on 11/21/2013 6:35:17 PM PST by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Title should have read “BWahahahahahah alert”


25 posted on 11/21/2013 6:37:06 PM PST by Personal Responsibility (Government: Slimy used car salesmen writing laws forcing you to buy their cars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Love it!


26 posted on 11/21/2013 6:39:09 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The people who wrote the PP&ACA don’t know what is in it? Does that sound credulous to you?


27 posted on 11/21/2013 6:41:08 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("Of the 4 wars in my lifetime none came about because the US was too strong." Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Welcome to the real world Obama lovers.

LMAO, this may be so bad that Democrat Congressional staffer will be voting against Democrats.

And they get subsidies.


28 posted on 11/21/2013 6:43:32 PM PST by Venturer (Keep Obama and you aint seen nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The people that wrote it really do not know what is in it.

Sebelius and Obama keep changing it and adding regulations.

This isn’t a law it’s an open way to destroy the Middle class and take away any money Americans might have to spend at small business’s. Thereby killing small business.


29 posted on 11/21/2013 6:48:19 PM PST by Venturer (Keep Obama and you aint seen nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
They can arbitrarily decide what staff is 'official' and what staff is 'unofficial' and somehow this has an impact on what they pay for health insurance?

I would like to get my re-designation now. We get one too, right? What? I can't hear you over the crickets.

30 posted on 11/21/2013 6:56:22 PM PST by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PistolPaknMama

Sorry, dear, waivers are for Democrats....


31 posted on 11/21/2013 6:57:13 PM PST by nascarnation (Wish everyone see a "Gay Kwanzaa")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

A good, hard kick in the ‘nads? The aparatchniks? I missed it.
Can I see it again?

‘Sure, kid.’
“Ow, My Balls!”


32 posted on 11/21/2013 6:58:02 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG
many congressional staffers — designated as “official” aides — were forced to move out of the old heavily subsidized Federal Employees Health Benefits program and into the District of Columbia’s health insurance marketplace exchange.

By heavily subsidized they mean 70% of the premium is covered by the government for a choice of policies that mostly break down to an 80% /20% insurance/benificiary benefit. When the employees are move to the exchanges the government pays up to 75% for what ends up being the same cost breakdown with higher deductibles.

I wonder how many chiefs of staff are career federal employees. One would think if they aren't they could easily move to K street if the health coverage is so bad. They could also punch their boss in the face for not designating them as an employee that gets to keep their FEHB.

33 posted on 11/21/2013 7:17:06 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQZ9kW3VzhB7uU2WxL0xk8_U2TlHobHM_cXR0OErTLEvTIqRK6J3g

Gwennie is my Congresswoman. This is really delicious.


34 posted on 11/21/2013 7:25:03 PM PST by TommyC1 (Fair tax, income tax, stupid ideas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Perhaps they doth complain too much.


35 posted on 11/21/2013 7:32:20 PM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

How about never?


36 posted on 11/21/2013 7:32:48 PM PST by Girlene (Hey, NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Who wooda thunk it? Congressional aids finding out that they’re really just peasants like the rest of us.


37 posted on 11/21/2013 7:40:22 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Why all this concern over a minuscule subset of the population? It's not as if the entire taxpaying populace of the country isn't facing the same or fearing it. They foisted this monstrosity and they should be subject to it too, not able to wheedle and whinge their way out of it.
38 posted on 11/21/2013 7:40:59 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

we should never have been subsidizing their insurance to start with


39 posted on 11/21/2013 7:42:09 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I can and I do get my care from the VA, when I have a good year I use BC/BS and insure myself wife and kids. We paid $700 month in 2011 and it went up about 25% a year.

I’m amused but not surprised by the fact that everybody whether they are on the left or right are so surprised by how much health insurance costs.

Something that is overlooked here is that most Americans don’t know or care what the actual costs are.

This is a huge problem for any fiscal conservative. We can say cut spending but with the American medicare/welfare state existing as it does simple math says healthcare spending for baby boomers in the next 40 years will bankrupt the USA.


40 posted on 11/21/2013 8:18:39 PM PST by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson