Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keystone Pipeline Update: Obama Approves New Cross-Border Pipeline Benefiting Canadian Oil
IB Times ^ | 11/27/13 | David Kashi

Posted on 11/29/2013 6:24:31 AM PST by Libloather

Whether or not President Barack Obama will approve the Keystone XL pipeline or not, oil sand in Alberta will continue to be extracted, as the president recently gave the go ahead in a new cross-border pipeline benefiting Canadian oil producers.

The 1,900-mile proposed Cochin, Kinder Morgan pipeline, approved on Nov. 22, will transport natural gas liquids (NGL) produced from hydraulic fracturing in Texas, north through Illinois and eventually into Alberta. There is a demand for imports of condensate to use as a diluent for blending with heavy Canadian crude.

Extracting oil sands requires a lot of energy to break down the bitumen, which is a form of petroleum in solid or semi-solid form that is blended in clay, sand and water. To flow through a pipeline it needs diluent to help break down the solid form.

(Excerpt) Read more at ibtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; downthetoilet; kenyanbornmuzzie; keystone; keystonexl; oil; opec; pipeline; pipetease
Full title: Keystone Pipeline Update: Obama Approves New Cross-Border Pipeline Benefiting Canadian Oil Sand Producers
1 posted on 11/29/2013 6:24:31 AM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

” - - - north through Illinois - - - “

The “most transparent” corruption administration continues to bypass the always gullible RINO Speaker of the House, Boehner.


2 posted on 11/29/2013 6:31:09 AM PST by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
The 1,900-mile proposed Cochin, Kinder Morgan pipeline, approved on Nov. 22, will transport natural gas liquids (NGL) produced from hydraulic fracturing in Texas, north through Illinois and eventually into Alberta. There is a demand for imports of condensate to use as a diluent for blending with heavy Canadian crude.
Zero's still stonewalling on Keystone XL. Thanks Libloather.


3 posted on 11/29/2013 6:57:42 AM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
So this pipeline is going north but is acceptable? Apparently the One knows somehow that pipelines going north are not susceptible to the environmental concerns expressed over the Keystone pipeline coming south. “Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.” ― Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
4 posted on 11/29/2013 7:28:42 AM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
” - - - north through Illinois - - - “

I thought it went through Nebraska? Maybe that was a different one.

Oh well, Nebraska, Illinois, they're all the same right??

5 posted on 11/29/2013 7:38:57 AM PST by China Clipper ( Animals? Sure I like animals. See? There's one there, right next to the potatoes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
This project will create a right-of-way that can also facilitate a pipeline for the flow of raw oil sand product to U.S. refineries in Texas. Keystone by a different name?
6 posted on 11/29/2013 7:41:18 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wildbill; SunkenCiv

I’ve got it! If the Keystone XL pipeline ran through Illinois, where it would potentially create jobs, Obama would be for it, not against it. Ever notice how the most dovish liberal congressman will support a Defense Department program, if it is based in his home district? It’s the same kind of thinking here.

Likewise, last spring when I drove through southern Illinois, I saw a few oil wells pumping near the Wabash River, but nobody in the federal government wants to shut them down.


7 posted on 11/29/2013 9:21:45 AM PST by Berosus (I wish I had as much faith in God as liberals have in government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wildbill

It would appear that the prospect of selling American petro products to Canada trumps the sale of Canadian petro-products to the U.S.A. must be a NAFTA thing...better to pander to Berkshire-Hathaway than display evenhandedness. I sensed Obama was a slimeball and not our friend from the getgo.


8 posted on 11/29/2013 9:47:12 AM PST by albertabound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Berosus

He’s in favor of anything that lines his pockets and/or the pockets of the criminals who financed his takeover.


9 posted on 11/30/2013 2:01:04 PM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson