Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Child taken from womb by social services
Telegraph ^ | 30 Nov 2013 | Colin Freeman

Posted on 11/30/2013 6:23:19 PM PST by Libloather

A pregnant woman has had her baby forcibly removed by caesarean section by social workers.

Essex social services obtained a High Court order against the woman that allowed her to be forcibly sedated and her child to be taken from her womb.

**SNIP**

The baby girl, now 15 months old, is still in the care of social services, who are refusing to give her back to the mother, even though she claims to have made a full recovery.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: baby; child; formerlygreatbritain; uk; woman; womb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: HollyB

Didn’t Mia Farrow star in a movie about this?


41 posted on 12/02/2013 6:19:33 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: HollyB; F15Eagle
Barbaric! This is what happens when a nation forgets God. He removes Himself and the end result is that it reaps the evil it has sown. Insane un-Godly policies prevail. And unfortunately, it appears America is close behind, if not already there. The governments of this world want to take the place of God. We are in dark times.

Psalm 139:13

For You formed my inward parts;
You covered me in my mother’s womb.

42 posted on 12/02/2013 6:52:06 AM PST by 444Flyer (How long O LORD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

Ssssh, don’t tell them that, once they figure out that we have private hospitals as well as the NHS, then they’ll think it’s ok to come here and criticise in person

;)


43 posted on 12/02/2013 6:58:33 AM PST by AnAmericanInEngland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

I suppose the question is germane. Sawney Beane, truth or myth?


44 posted on 12/02/2013 7:04:20 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Last Obamacare Promise: "If You Like Your Eternal Soul, You Can Keep It.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

“...The Brit gov’t has basically assaulted her,...”

Nah... yer overreacting....

EVERYBODY knows that When governments do stuff like this it’s clearly not assault. It’s “for the common good”.

It’s only “assault” when YOU fight back, dontcha know... or try to prevent them from harming you. THEN it’s “assault” and whatever else they can dream up.

Gots ta get it right, friend!!!!

(hope I don’t need the /sarc tag here...)


45 posted on 12/02/2013 9:16:04 AM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Hmmm, lol.

Good question, probably myth, perhaps based on some reality, but like many myths, grossly exaggerated.

BTW, I am not blindly defending Essex NHS in this case, I am as uneasy as everyone else here, I am just pointing out that such case aren’t exclusive to old Limeyville.


46 posted on 12/02/2013 9:40:47 AM PST by the scotsman (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanInEngland

Hi!.

You still living over here, in this dump of a country?. Why, lol.


47 posted on 12/02/2013 9:43:23 AM PST by the scotsman (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Essex Social Services (or SS if you wish lol), not NHS.


48 posted on 12/02/2013 9:44:06 AM PST by the scotsman (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: HollyB

And to top it off they refuse to allow her to have her child back because she may suffer a relapse, even though she is now taking her medication.
So they can take a child away just on the possibility that someone with a condition may relapse?


49 posted on 12/02/2013 9:45:14 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

“Bipolar disorder is highly heritable. The baby has a high chance of being bipolar as well.”


Please, educate yourself to the TRUTH.


50 posted on 12/02/2013 9:46:16 AM PST by ourworldawry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

I’ve suffered from panic attacks occasionally all my life. My Doctors advised blowing in a paper bag and physical exercise first before taking meds. I never knew that in Briton a panic attack is cause for having your child taken away, but of course she is the one that called the police.


51 posted on 12/02/2013 9:50:31 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

Its a better place career-wise for me and beside that, she-who-must-be-obeyed is from England and I promised her we’d move back if she kicked breast cancer. She did, and after paying off 10k in medical bills, we packed up and moved over, other than the weather, I love it here.


52 posted on 12/02/2013 10:45:40 AM PST by AnAmericanInEngland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC
Bipolar disorder is highly heritable. The baby has a high chance of being bipolar as well.

None of the government's business.

53 posted on 12/02/2013 12:27:40 PM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Something like that would alone cause serious mental anguish and problems. Talk about trying to send someone over the edge.


54 posted on 12/02/2013 12:31:23 PM PST by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Sooner or later, the government will assume control over that which it presides. Making abortion in Roe V. Wade a federal issue which it is not (as well as many other thing the Feds interfere with unconstitutionally) allows the government to close in on assuming control over pregnancies. The “progressives” and socialists would like to make everything and everyone property of the federal government. They already do pretty much whatever they want. The next step isn’t too far from that.


55 posted on 12/02/2013 12:34:45 PM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

If this bi-polar woman had decided to have an abortion the British state would have paid for it and applauded her “right to choose” to “terminate her pregnancy” and expel the “fetal tissue” from her body. They would not have accepted an argument that she was not mentally fit to make such a decision or that the unborn child had any recognized rights. By intervening in this case and forcibly taking the baby, the British state has effectively recognized that the fetus is in fact an unborn child deserving of protection. They are blinded by their hypocrisy and will never admit the obvious.


56 posted on 12/02/2013 12:38:18 PM PST by littleharbour ("All men having power ought to be distrusted to a certain degree. ~ James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob; goat granny; miss marmelstein; Kozak; monocle; ourworldawry
Bipolar disorder is highly heritable. The baby has a high chance of being bipolar as well.

Whether or not that’s true, one thing IS true: is it is none of the government's business.

57 posted on 12/02/2013 12:50:22 PM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Okay, how is that even remotely ethical?


58 posted on 12/02/2013 12:52:48 PM PST by RichInOC (Palin 2016: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Why not let her deliver the child naturally? Thisnis barbaric. Next they are going to mandate abortion. Pro choice my arse. Even Hillary is speaking of sustainable development.

If they try doing that to my future wife and child, I'll turn into the worst boogeyman that these vermin can imagine. None of this sitting around at home whining about "injustice".
59 posted on 12/02/2013 1:49:12 PM PST by Wanderer99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew
Sooner or later, the government will assume control over that which it presides. Making abortion in Roe V. Wade a federal issue which it is not (as well as many other thing the Feds interfere with unconstitutionally) allows the government to close in on assuming control over pregnancies. The “progressives” and socialists would like to make everything and everyone property of the federal government. They already do pretty much whatever they want. The next step isn’t too far from that.

We are free when we declare ourselves to be such. So far I'm not seeing a whole lot of bravery from the human race. It appears that people love comfort so much that they are afraid to step on any government toes....even if that means the torment and death of their own children. I hate people...
60 posted on 12/02/2013 1:52:21 PM PST by Wanderer99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson