Posted on 12/02/2013 5:03:05 AM PST by Kaslin
There are a lot of freaking books out there. To which are you referring?
That’s a much stronger assertion than just your opinion.
The consequences, though, are this - and liberals should be asked to defend it -
Obama can do WHATEVER he wants to do without consequences (I would include religious genocide it the “whatever”)
- is that the kind of power a president should have?
I stand corrected :^
Good point.
Robamaney was a pi$$ poor candidate.
Almost as bad as McInsane in 20018.
That is not to say the dems do not engage in voter fraud as a matter of course, but the rebublicrats should at LEAST offer a viable candidate before worrying about whether a few thousand, or even a few hundred-thousand, fraudulent votes cost them an election.
...or even, McInsane in 2008...
I vaguely recall Romney claiming he would cut some taxes, drill some oil and make some completely unspecified spending cuts. And maybe make some changes to medicare that wouldnt start until 2022.
He and Ryan said they would let congress figure out what to cut in spending AFTER he took office.
I guess Obama's lies sounded better to swing state voters than Romney's lies did.
The Constitution and the Federalist papers. What good is it to impeach without a conviction? Nothing. Nada.
I agree it failed, but now we are learning it had lots of help. Namely IRS.
Don't forget the LSM.
Okay.
I’ve never thought of the U.S. Constitution as a book, though.
I was responding to
There is a very traditional, popular and fully legal process for going about this that took place last November, it was called the election and it failed
And I responded.....Or was it stolen....
You keep regurgitating Romney/Ryan.....
Yes, we know about them.
We know that less votes were tallied for Romney than were for McCain previously.
Notice I’m not saying less people voted against Obama...
could be, could be just that fewer were tallied.
And Obama promising voters that Obamacare would let them keep their doctors, when it was not true.
But over on the Romney side things were not well at all.
I mean Rush, Rove, Romney campaign (like that windbag Sununu) all claimed they were sure that it was looking like a big win for Romney.
Broken compass leads to wrong direction.
If you were to hand my wallet to a thief by accident then tell me it was stolen from you by him I would have trouble with that explaination.
Mittens was part of their plan. Once again we let the LSM & the RATS pick our candidate.
It was over before it ever started.
They cheated, BIG TIME & got completely away with it. Not just the IRS, remember the phony jobs report it all was part of the plan. And it worked. Nixon must be roliing like a top in his grave.
They think they can get away with the obama-don't care. It is looking more and more like they will too.
......I agree with you BUT we need to start honing and perfecting and polishing the case against the sob so that we can be READY to shout it
from the mountain tops on the hour every hour every single day between now and the election. Then maybe we can drag a few LIV’s on board because to get Obama a cell in Leavenworth were going to need to educate a few million LIV’s!
In the meantime PRAY, this ship is sinking fast with more damage being done daily.
If it isn’t going to happen, then why write about it? Even if the gop had control of both houses of Congress, the chance of an impeachment of dear leader is nil. Assuming that the gop had the intestinal fortitude to impeach, which it does not, why would the gop even want to? The gop is quite happy to see the scope and breadth of government expanded. The gop is quite happy to see the executive wield extra legal powers.
I cant argue with any of that.
On Obamacare, Obama doesnt care if 2014 is another 2010 bloodbath as much as a he cares that Obamacare go forward.
We all know that once a large # of people get subsidized or free Obamacare, then trying to take it away will be politically near impossible.
The GOP has been given a rare opportunity now to trot out endless numbers of victims of Obamacare, a game that Desm always play expertly, and they need to not let up.
I don't disagree, but the Republicans must make an articulate and cogent case against him before uttering the word "impeachment" in the House of Representatives. And while they don't have to convince everyone, they must at least cause people to raise their eyebrows, and maybe even get a few lime-minded Democrats on their side. Otherwise, the GOP looks petty.
I say this, not in defense of Obama, but because I recognize that impreachment is more a political thing than a legal one. One need only look back as far as Bill Clinton, to see that. People wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt--remember, "it's not really an impeachable offense if the economy's doing great, right?" What sort of benefit would Obama get?
You can bet that Obama's defenders will argue and mince words, using logic like, "he had to bend the law, in order to enforce the law!" Or, "he's using effective project management skills to adjust the enforcement timing." And until the Republicans can get more that Fox News to report a story accurately, or until they get film of Obama in a hot tub with a 14 year-old boy, they're only going to look silly. If they couldn't make the events in Benghazi stick, they're not going to make "failure to faithfully execute laws" to stick.
The chances are good the election was stolen by massive fraud, so add one more impeachable charge to the pile.
No one has the balls to even try
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.