1 posted on
12/16/2013 12:53:15 PM PST by
Kaslin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: Kaslin
who toil thanklessly to analyze the impact of lots of really good bills that somehow never get passed. Define: really good bills
2 posted on
12/16/2013 12:56:42 PM PST by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Kaslin
The CONS disappeared utterly and completely a long time ago. The enumeration was the heart, soul, essence, and core of the CONS; once it was flushed down the toilet it was all over.
To: Kaslin
To explain the droughts cause, Brooks cites Fukayamas essay in the current issue of The American Interest, The Decay of American Institutions, which diagnoses increased polarization, too many interest groups and lobbyists, and expansive power grabs by courts that foster too much litigation, all of which have combined to shrink the influence of the executive branch. The fact that Brooks thinks we need a more powerful government/dictator shows once and for all his charade of being a 'conservative' is over.
4 posted on
12/16/2013 12:59:15 PM PST by
GeronL
(Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
To: Kaslin
OK so we torc the Constitution —and what do we have? Oh, maybe a replacement like Mao’s little red book or Kaddafy’s little gree book might be nice. Maybe because we’e so inclusive it could be Barry’s Little Rainbow Reader —whatever, my head is spining.
To: Kaslin
"That would be interesting, and pleasing to deep thinkers disappointed in Congresss failure to pass a lot of awesome new laws."
Congress has passed sufficient awesome new laws, thank you very much. I have a better idea. Keep the constitution. Send Congress home. Please.
6 posted on
12/16/2013 1:01:02 PM PST by
PowderMonkey
(WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
To: Kaslin
A couple of damn neocons.
Screw em.
7 posted on
12/16/2013 1:02:21 PM PST by
Darren McCarty
(Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
To: Kaslin
Its a long held progressive desire to have a group of elites making the real decisions for the bewildered herd in this case Wilsonian propagandist Walter Lippmann.
Early on Lippmann said the "bewildered herd," his way of referring to the masses, must be governed by a specialized class whose interests reach beyond the locality." This class is composed of experts, specialists and bureaucrats. The experts, who often are referred to as "elites," were to be a machinery of knowledge that circumvents the primary defect of democracy, the impossible ideal of the "omnicompetent citizen".
9 posted on
12/16/2013 1:02:37 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: Kaslin
Yes, that’s what we need, a really nice and wise and most excellent dictator who can create a grand society we all want so badly. You know, like North Korea.
10 posted on
12/16/2013 1:04:45 PM PST by
lurk
To: Kaslin
Nah, let’s torch David Brooks’ trousers, with the perfectly creased pant leg, instead.
To: Kaslin
Brooks sounds like a Freshmen Poli/Sci student writing an essay decrying Federalism because “they just can’t get anything done”.
Brooks is supposed to be smart?
12 posted on
12/16/2013 1:07:39 PM PST by
DariusBane
(Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept?)
To: Kaslin
Torch the Constitution?
I would like to see him enter the National Archives and try it.
13 posted on
12/16/2013 1:10:05 PM PST by
Slyfox
(We want our pre-existing HEALTH INSURANCE back!)
To: Kaslin
a constitutional democrat.
Isn’t that some kind of absurdity?
Constitutional AND a democrat???
14 posted on
12/16/2013 1:11:38 PM PST by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Kaslin
..... The term "Conservative" has been redefined by the collaborators with this administration. "Conservative" now means RINO/Moderate. What was once thought of and termed as "Conservative" is now called by the derogatory terms "Tea-bagger/Tea Party."
16 posted on
12/16/2013 1:13:46 PM PST by
R_Kangel
( "A Nation of Sheep ..... Will Beget ..... a Nation Ruled by Wolves.")
To: Kaslin
Don't forget, this Bolshevik is the guy who shows up on panel discussions on PBS and NBC to present the
conservative point of view.
That's how they move the needle on the center of the debate - have a man with the political views of Karl Marx pretend to be the conservative in the discussion
To: Kaslin
Anybody who thinks they would be a benign dictator would end with bodies piled in ditches. There’s no such thing. That’s why we have co-equal branches. (Or, had before Obama.)
To: Kaslin
This is the kind of freeloader crap you get when you stop teaching what it means to be an American in our schools. Bass turds like Brooks would do anything to get rid of the Second Amendment. Even torch the U.S. Constitution. Deport the bass turd to Pyong Yang.
20 posted on
12/16/2013 1:24:06 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(Merry Christmas to all my fellow Americans. "Whatever" to everybody else!)
To: Kaslin
That might fly in his corner of the former USA, but it won't fly in mine.
22 posted on
12/16/2013 1:37:41 PM PST by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: Kaslin
Poofters like Davie have a different way of looking at things. They live for the moment.
24 posted on
12/16/2013 1:40:07 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
To: Kaslin
Under Obama and his Marxists the "Pax Americana that has lasted almost 100 years is now for all practical purposes DEAD. What will replace it is pure conjecture but my guess is that it will not be peaceful by any definition.
27 posted on
12/16/2013 1:44:09 PM PST by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: Kaslin
An article you will NEVER see a Leftist like Brooks write when a Republican is in office.
Brooks is a fascist hypocrite of the highest order. What Brooks really wants, and what everybody who reads this column intuitively understands, is that Brooks really wants a fascist government run by central planners made up of Democrats. He is arguing for a benevolent dictatorship because he believes it’s good for us.
Speak for yourself, you fool!
28 posted on
12/16/2013 1:58:30 PM PST by
Obadiah
(I Like Ted.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson