Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Algae to crude oil: Million-year natural process takes minutes in the lab
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory ^ | 12/17/2013 | Tom Rickey

Posted on 12/20/2013 9:24:42 AM PST by logi_cal869

Engineers have created a continuous chemical process that produces useful crude oil minutes after they pour in harvested algae — a verdant green paste with the consistency of pea soup.(snip)

In the PNNL process, a slurry of wet algae is pumped into the front end of a chemical reactor. Once the system is up and running, out comes crude oil in less than an hour, along with water and a byproduct stream of material containing phosphorus that can be recycled to grow more algae.

With additional conventional refining, the crude algae oil is converted into aviation fuel, gasoline or diesel fuel. And the waste water is processed further, yielding burnable gas and substances like potassium and nitrogen, which, along with the cleansed water, can also be recycled to grow more algae.(snip)

The recent work is part of DOE's National Alliance for Advanced Biofuels & Bioproducts, or NAABB. This project was funded with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds by DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Both PNNL and Genifuel have been partners in the NAABB program.

(Excerpt) Read more at pnnl.gov ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: algae; biofuel; energy; green; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: Michael.SF.
This may explain Abiotic oil theories that have long been laughed at by enviromentalmidgets.

This shows the Biotic production of oil, the same process that when trapped away from oxygen in ocean/lake sediment, produced the oil we harvest from drilling.

41 posted on 12/20/2013 10:20:10 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Hmmm, I am going to have to look at both later, as to be honest I am not clear on the subject of biotic vs. abiotic.
42 posted on 12/20/2013 10:37:01 AM PST by Michael.SF. (I never thought anyone could make Jimmy Carter look good in comparison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

This is “bio-diesel” they’ve been putting in Navy ships?


43 posted on 12/20/2013 10:40:00 AM PST by Excellence (All your database are belong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Imagine algae on the endangered species list.


44 posted on 12/20/2013 10:42:43 AM PST by Peter W. Kessler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

Probably very uneconomical.

Would be useful to produce fuels off earth though.


45 posted on 12/20/2013 10:43:27 AM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

biotic is biological, grown.

abiotic is non-biological, not-grown.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/biotic

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/abiotic


46 posted on 12/20/2013 10:48:50 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

If we anticipate a steady stream operation right at the refinery, the first question is; What sort of VOULUME, capacity, output is feasible with such a lash-up? It’s an interesting process, but if it only produces a few gallons of gasoline or jet fuel or whatever per day, what’s the excitement about?


47 posted on 12/20/2013 10:58:22 AM PST by Tucker39 (ed eith a hot iron.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Thermal Depolymerization Process oil has been around for a while. The process is designed to handle almost any waste product imaginable, including turkey offal, tires, plastic bottles, harbor-dredged muck, old computers, municipal garbage, cornstalks, paper-pulp effluent, infectious medical waste, even oil-refinery residues. There are actually three product streams: a form of natural gas, varying grades of petroleum (depending on the feedstock being reduced), and various minerals, either as elemental metals or oxides. The substance goes into the reaction retort vessel as a watery slurry, and cooking time is a matter of only a few hours. Actually, the superheated steam under pressure (two to five atmospheres) is what does the conversion. There is a serious amount of heat that has to be applied to start the process, but once under way, the gaseous volatiles are enough fuel to keep the process going in a series of other retorts, in various stages of the cook-down. The other problem is keeping the process supplied with feedstock material, much like an incinerator that burns trash for power generation. The kinds and composition of the feedstock have to be carefully monitored, but this is a doable technique. It would work very well on a high-volume sewage processing facility, for example, with no need for drying down the residue.


48 posted on 12/20/2013 10:58:39 AM PST by alloysteel (Those who deny natural climate change are forever doomed to stupidity. AGW is a LIE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

In part, perhaps. But personally I believe Thomas Gold was right about the abiotic origins of most of the hydrocarbons we extract from the earth.


49 posted on 12/20/2013 11:01:01 AM PST by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

The guy in the video at the link is my BIL. Hubby is pretty proud of his little bro.


50 posted on 12/20/2013 11:31:33 AM PST by AZHSer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZHSer
The guy in the video at the link is my BIL

So cool!

This kind of science was my 3rd-calling. Love this stuff.

51 posted on 12/20/2013 11:56:20 AM PST by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ScottfromNJ

That’s irrelevant if the majority of input energy is sunlight...


52 posted on 12/20/2013 12:02:08 PM PST by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

And there are plenty of areas in the desert southwest where land is plentiful and inexpensive and where the sun shines almost every day. A sealed system could trap and reuse the water to prevent evaporation while simultaneously avoiding the release of any stench from the algae ponds. And installing solar panels to assist in running the machinery can reduce the operating costs.

A little ingenuity could easily make this feasible. Personally, I’d also like to see some vertical axis wind turbines installed as a supplemental energy source for the operation. But no subsidies or grants. It would survive or fail on its own merits.


53 posted on 12/20/2013 12:04:49 PM PST by Two Kids' Dad (((( ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar
Turning “pea soup” into oil sounds like a good use for pea soup. I wonder if they will have to exclude ham from the recipe?

Only for observant Jews, Muslims and vegans. Go to the pump with the circle U/Parve on the label.
54 posted on 12/20/2013 12:23:11 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869
this does nothing to reduce our so-called 'carbon footprint' (its product is hydrocarbons, regardless its source).

All the carbon in the hydrocarbons came out of the atmosphere, so it evens out.

55 posted on 12/20/2013 1:07:53 PM PST by JoeFromSidney ( book, RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY, available from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney
I forgot my </sarc> tag...

Preaching to the choir.

56 posted on 12/20/2013 1:13:32 PM PST by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Grow it on sewage.

Actually a good initial application. Then the process can be improved further. If the cost benefit in fuel production is only slightly better than crude refining, but as a method of waste treatment is cost effective, then consider the extracted oil to be a byproduct stream - still a revenue stream to recoup the cost of sewage treatment.

Anyhow, the oil from algae is about on the level of light sweet crude.


57 posted on 12/20/2013 1:17:15 PM PST by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

This is a very special strain of algae. It is not pond scum. It cannot be grown in open ponds, or “on” sewage. The process is not new. The only innovation here appears to be that they have constructed a continuous stream, however small.


58 posted on 12/20/2013 2:39:20 PM PST by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: katana

It’s possible that there might both abiotic as well as biotic origins for oil since science is proving that both can be done in the lab.


59 posted on 12/20/2013 3:40:19 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; me = independent conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
This isn’t activism.

We need this information so we can go over and PO the DUmmies.

60 posted on 12/20/2013 3:46:06 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson