Posted on 12/23/2013 7:13:42 AM PST by SkyPilot
The Pentagon's top civilian says it's time to tame burgeoning military personnel costs, but he's facing a test of wills with the nation's powerful veterans groups, which want no cut in their benefits.
Veterans groups are fighting curbs in annual pension increases for military retirees under age 62 that are part of the new budget deal passed by Congress last week and awaiting President Barack Obama's signature. After a barrage of protests from the military community, lawmakers said they'll review the cut next year and possibly reverse it. But Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Thursday that reform of military compensation can't be avoided.
"We all know that we need to slow cost growth in military compensation," Hagel told a Pentagon press conference. "We know that many proposals will be controversial and unpopular. ... Tough decisions will have to be made."
Retirees want the belt-tightening done elsewhere.
Here's a look at what members of the U.S. armed forces get now and the debate:
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
This was a betrayal, pure and simple.
Merry Christmas military - we screwed you.
Paul Ryan, Patty Murray, Obama, and Chuck Hagel should be ashamed of themselves.
I am not worried about this at all. Doesn’t happen until January 2016 and they will repeal this for sure.
Hagel is a disgrace.
This Congress and this administration will stab the military in the back. As a constituency, military retirees are a small group compared to the general population. So, these politicians think they can cut retired pay and medical coverage because the blowback will be a lot less than from military retirees than from other potential groups which are larger. The Federal Government does so much that is not Constitutional. The cuts should start in those programs, not in the defense, which is one of the few legitimate functions of the Federal Government. Only after cutting programs which the government shouldn’t be doing in the first place, should cuts to the military be considered.
Well... this is still BS of the highest order.It should have never gotten this far in the first place.
God Bless Our Military and our veterans. Enjoy this Merry Christmas from Chuck Norris; sound up!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9W82sMSMJJg&feature=share
Meanwhile, fraud and corruption is rampant in every branch of this government and the King parties on while members of Congress service each other.
These people are deliberately hurting the people they hate the most: the elderly and the military.
That’s what Barry’s “government shutdown” was all about also. The sleazebags at the White House need to hurt those who normal Americans have a lot of respect for. Having never ending news clips of EPA employees complaining about the “shutdown” wouldn’t have worked out very well for them.
Thanks Red!
This is going to be an epic fight. I believe in the end we will win - because it that is justice, and I will pray to Almighty God with all my heart that He fights for us.
Start by cutting Congressional pensions instead, and listen to the wails of protest!
This section in the article exposes the lie they are trying to sell. If this petty officer gets a 50% retirement at 20 years, and if he makes 80,000 a year, then he gets 40,000 which is 50% of 80,000. However, 40,000 divided by 12 months equals 3,333 dollars a month. But, their own article says he gets only 2200 a month. In other words, they have just distorted the truth. The truth is that the military moves you to Quonset City and tells you to set up house. Obviously, you don't have a choice. Nor do you make enough cash to fund the costs of moving and housing every time you move, and you don't build equity in any of those places you've lived. In short, when they give you a "housing allowance" they're just paying expenses that they have caused you to have.
They publish those expenses as "pay" that you're receiving, and then they don't include it in your retirement pay which is calculated only on the "base pay."
Nor do they include that you pay all taxes on that 2200 retirement, fed/fica/med/etc. Nor do they include that for your spouse to have any benefit at all that you must also buy her a death annuity that costs about 300 of your 2200.
So, the 2200 is now down in the neighborhood of 1700 a month or 20,000 bucks a year.
And, you're looking for a job at the young age of your mid-40's. And Ryan thinks that's a great benefit.
So, they lie by omission over and over. That retired Chief Petty Officer is going to have to scramble to compete with younger job seekers in order to supplement his 20,000 a year take home.
And Ryan is trying to make it sound like they're getting rich. What's rich is that jerks gets 75% of his congressional pay after just 5 years service.
Congress is populated with crooks, and Paul Ryan is one of them.
>> “Congress is populated with crooks, and Paul Ryan is one of them” <<
.
And that is being generous!
Perhaps. The silver lining is that Ryan has revealed his character and he cannot be trusted. Either that or he is entirely incompetent. An ashsole as well. There are GOP leaders in the House & Senate, but none are in leadership positions.
Very well put. I'd add VA dental is dangerous. It's best to brush & floss regularly and wear a mouth guard if one grinds at night.
These people are deliberately hurting the people they hate the most: the elderly and the military.
***
A while back my husband worked for a civilian female who was high up in the chain. She ate higher ranking officers for breakfast. Her favorite was asking him to carry her suitcases wherever she went and also to get her lunch.
Needless to say she isn’t in service anymore. Things caught up with her — but she was typical of the type that serve at the highest levels who care absolutely nothing about the military and see them as expendable slaves.
Maybe NOW vet groups will turn their backs on Obozo, Mooch and Dr. Jill like they did to Geo. H. W. Bush when they want a military photo op.....
Hey, an 0-6 at 30 yrs doesn’t make $80K........
...in retirement, that is.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.