Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House panics as millennials wise up, bail on Obama
The Washington Times ^ | January 26, 2014 | Joseph Curl

Posted on 01/27/2014 2:46:49 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

President Obama is making a sudden push to win back millennial voters, who have grown disillusioned over his failed “Hope and Change” campaign that left them without jobs, living in their parents’ basement.

Even though he has run his last race, the president needs the 18-to-34 age group to make his signature Obamacare policy work. Without them, the whole system falls apart — not tomorrow, today, right now, before the radical reform of U.S. health care can even get off the ground.

Just how bad is it? Just 24 percent of the new enrollees to Obamacare are between 18 and 34. The entire plan was predicated on a sign-up rate of nearly 40 percent, the idea being that healthy young people will pay more — much more — than they once did to offset the unhealthy elderly signing up for Obamacare.

In some states, the sign-up rate for millennials is abysmal: Arizona and West Virginia saw just 17 percent of the age group enroll. The White House, of course, predicts that number will grow as the deadline to sign up nears at the end of March (if you’ve got a millennial kid, you know they only do things at the last minute).

But the situation is far worse than just flagging enrollment of Obamacare, and the president knows it...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: millenials; obama; obamacare; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last
To: reformedliberal; silverleaf

Re premiums on 18 -26 year-olds staying on plan:

The premium CAN be very high. For example, in Massachusetts, I was told there are three plan prices for a given type of plan (Bronze, Silver, etc): Single, Couple, or “Family.”

The family plans are significantly more expensive than the couple plan—like 35 or 40%. However, the family cost is the same whether there is one kid or ten kids on it. So, if the choice is about keeping the last kid on the plan, or dropping back to couples coverage, it’s an expensive no-go. I found that with three young adults, everyone was better off if they bought their own insurance than if I kept them on a family plan.

Now, with the increased costs piled on the young through the ACA, that might not be true for 3 kids, but it is probably still true for 2, and certainly for one.


41 posted on 01/27/2014 7:31:14 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Someone 18 years old don’t associate Bush to anything so Zero’s abilty to blame him is zero.


42 posted on 01/27/2014 10:00:05 AM PST by CodeToad (When ignorance rules a person's decision they are resorting to superstition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson