Skip to comments.
Bachmann says House preparing to sue Obama for overreach: ‘He’s not a king’
Daily Caller ^
| 1/29/14
| Alex Pappas
Posted on 01/29/2014 5:19:54 PM PST by Nachum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Can we depose him? Please Oh Please Oh Please... under oath.
1
posted on
01/29/2014 5:19:54 PM PST
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
Bammy is not a king, he’s a marxist, islamic Dicktater.
2
posted on
01/29/2014 5:20:52 PM PST
by
Paladin2
To: Nachum
Hes not a king Well ... not yet ...
3
posted on
01/29/2014 5:20:58 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(Anti-Complacency League! Baby!)
To: Nachum
4
posted on
01/29/2014 5:22:10 PM PST
by
OKSooner
("As the riders went on by him, he heard one call his name...")
To: Nachum
Bachman has more balls them the eunuch's in Washington. But this is not going to happen.
5
posted on
01/29/2014 5:23:32 PM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(I never thought anyone could make Jimmy Carter look good in comparison.)
To: Nachum
Well sue the president of the United States and force him to no longer act unilaterally, she said. Talk is cheap. Do it.
To: Nachum
She said the plan is to introduce legislation allowing lawmakers to hire an attorney, so we can force the president to act under the Constitution. So Harry Reid is actually going to allow this legislation to pass in the Senate and then Obama will sign it into law?
7
posted on
01/29/2014 5:25:27 PM PST
by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: Nachum
He has sovereign immunity.
He must be impeached.
To: Nachum
Open Hearings on the Articles of Impeachment and quit dicking around.
9
posted on
01/29/2014 5:27:34 PM PST
by
Howie66
(Molon Labe, Traitors!)
To: Nachum
10
posted on
01/29/2014 5:28:14 PM PST
by
workerbee
(The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1!)
To: Nachum
“SUE”!
As much as I like Bachman it would seem she is as much a twit as the rest of her collegues. IMPEACH! That’s what the House is supposed to do.
11
posted on
01/29/2014 5:28:29 PM PST
by
diverteach
(If I find liberals in heaven after my death.....I WILL BE PISSED!!!)
To: Nachum
You’re an optimist! Thinking being under oath would have the slightest affect on whether he told the truth.
12
posted on
01/29/2014 5:29:09 PM PST
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Nachum
Sue? I thought according to the constitution the only thing you can do to the President is to impeach him.
To: Diogenesis
He must be impeached.
I wonder if 0bama and Holder are doing what they're doing on purpose... they're just itching for a constitutional crisis so they can pull off whatever they're planning in just that circumstance.
14
posted on
01/29/2014 5:29:49 PM PST
by
plsvn
To: Nachum
Shame you actually have to sue a fraud azzhole because he is pretending to be King and nobody has the guts to call him out unless they go to a court where the fraud azzhole has the judges all in his favor.
15
posted on
01/29/2014 5:30:28 PM PST
by
dforest
To: Nachum
Since when does the Legislative branch have to take the Executive to court?
They aren’t powerless. They have impeachment (abuse of power qualifies, its the real reason Clinton was impeached), Congressional nullification of Federal Regulations, nullification of EO’s through constraining laws, withholding expenditures, and other measures too abstract to mention.
It’s beneath them to go to the courts. In the United States the Congress is first among equals, and who said they were equals anyway? The courts are constrained by Congress.
They need to start multi-pronged legislative initiatives on this guy and his co-conspirators and ramp it up until either he stops or they impeach him, and who cares about the ensuing riots. That will simply be the icing on the cake: don’t ever put an unqualified thug on the throne just because of his skin color.
To: Timber Rattler
They’ve got to force the media to talk about it and try to defend the lawlessness.
In attacking her, they will have to at least mention why she is doing what she is doing.
17
posted on
01/29/2014 5:31:34 PM PST
by
digger48
To: driftdiver
Thinking being under oath would have the slightest affect on whether he told the truth. That is what I am COUNTING on. Lying under oath is exactly how the impeachment hearings got started for Clinton.
18
posted on
01/29/2014 5:32:54 PM PST
by
Nachum
(Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
To: Nachum
Yea yea yea We have been hearing for a year, just last week they were going to get rid of Johnny Boy - didn’t do that either.
19
posted on
01/29/2014 5:33:00 PM PST
by
svcw
(Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
To: Nachum
20
posted on
01/29/2014 5:35:20 PM PST
by
voicereason
(The RNC is like the "One-night stand" you wish you could forget.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson