Posted on 02/03/2014 10:35:02 AM PST by carlo3b
I FINALLY BELIEVE, IT IS THE WOMAN’S SOLE RIGHT TO CHOOSE..
For me, it came down to a matter of nature, and fairness. I thought it through, and in doing so, I made sure that I really thought it all the way through..
After all of my many years of standing on the sidelines and observing, as was what I have been instructed to do, as a man, I have concluded that it should be the ultimate decision of the woman to decide whether she should be a mother..
In balancing, deliberating, and reasoning, there was but one undeniable truth, if it was the genius of our reproductive system, and the female of our species was chosen by design, biologically, to bear the burden of child creation, she alone should carry the decision of whether she wishes to reproduce. As such, she alone carries the burden of who should be the sperm donor, where and when the reproductive act should transpire. FAIR, and EQUITABLE, RIGHT?
We all know, or at least we should take a great deal more into consideration before and after making that decision, about how important it is in choosing to have a child or children, how that child will be raised. But one step at a time..
Can we agree that the choice of becoming a mother carries more than a simple yes or no. Far be it for me to interfere with the dynamics that should be considered in a woman’s priority process, but the requirements in that decision, by nature and necessity, is how and why to choose the potential male donor, for a milieu of reasons. By carrying the SOLE access to the starting point of reproduction, also carries the sole responsibility for the results of that decision, the wellbeing of the resulting baby..
Assuming we are all on the same page, the donor (THE MALE OF THE SPECIES) has a limited, but vitally important contribution in the process, the seed, or sperm. The donor, has decisions to make as well, first and foremost, does he agree with her choice of him as the contributor, and her choice of where and when, and even in some cases, with all of the new technologies, how..
As a summary, how many choices are involved in the decision to reproduce for the woman; • Do I want to reproduce, or will the act be for some other reason that I should take the risk? • What are the criteria for choosing a potential mate, or participant? • Who will be the contributor, or partner, for whatever reason? • What planning, or precautions, if any, should be required before the act? • When and where the act should take place? • What will I do if the act has produced the intended results, a child? • What if the planning went awry and there are unintended consequences? • What if I become pregnant, who else should suffer the resulting consequences? • Are there any limitations on my decisions? • What if I didn’t plan, what are my responsibilities? • What is my last resort?
As we have outlined, there are a list of choices that a woman has with her reproductive activities, and natural tools to consider, all of which she has the ultimate choice to advance, or reject along the way. With all of these options, who should be responsible for her decisions, other than the one that made them?
So, since I had no choice, no rights to contribute to her decisions, and, unless I was the contributor to the act, leave me or anyone else that were forced out the resulting process, out f the problems, RIGHT?
GOOD LUCK, AND GOD BLESS
A man..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I've read this essay several times. I keep looking for the irony tag, or the sarcasm tag. They ain't there.
I think this fool is serious. Look again at the last paragrpah:
So, since I had no choice, no rights to contribute to her decisions, and, unless I was the contributor to the act, leave me or anyone else that were forced out the resulting process, out f the problems, RIGHT?
WRONG.
The pro-abortion rhetoric is strong with this article
I said it upthread; I'll say it again
Only you can put yourself in the "process." And once you're in, you're in.
“Christians have always been Pro-Choice.
Pro-Choice before conception, Pro-Life after conception.
Any attempt to end a Pregnancy after conception is nothing short of a Barbaric Murder!”
I don’t believe that god has specified that sentient life with a soul begins at conception. As a matter of fact, many fetuses are spontaneaously aborted if the mother is stressed or the fetus is non viable without extraordinary medical intervention.
For women, and men: don’t have sex. Make love, or don’t do it.
There is a profound difference. Loves welcomes babies. Love connects people. Love is faithful and self-sacrificing. Love builds the security of this generation while creating the next generation.
Recreational sex between uncommitted people leads to one of four bad ends: death or illness or heart break or a hardened heart. That’s the hard truth. The sooner people deal with it, the better for them and the world in general.
And less with all the words that go nowhere.
Bonus question;
Is it abortion or aborticide ?
If its sarcasm, carlo better respond quick with that “excuse”. I don’t think it is sarcasm.
Clarification required Sir.
...ONLY if her choice does not infringe on the pre-born CHILD’s choice.
"Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations."
Choose what?
As well as the father. If total control is given to the female as to aborting or not, then the father should not be on the hook for ANY support thereafter, should he choose NOT to provide support, since he has no say whatsoever.
I see what you did. You are saying (I hope) that the woman is the final arbiter whether or not to have sex and, as a result, get pregnant.
BTW, I see nothing about abortion in the post. Just about making the decision to take a chance on getting pregnant. Just my take.
Excellent post....but it contains too much truth, logic and common sense to be accepted by those whose minds have been clouded by our present pop culture...and those who ignore or abandon the notion of a Creator and His plans for our good.
I have the right to choose to NOT give ANY money to a woman to support her sexual choices.
It’s her body...OK.
It’s my money.
Wow! I took another look, and it looks like carlo3b wasn’t using sarcasm. My first post applies. Real men take responsibility for their actions, and real men do NOT stand by and do nothing when they see evil being done around them. That seems to be carlo3b’s point. If he wasn’t involved, it’s none of his business. Shameful!
If I’ve misinterpreted your point, carlo3b, please explain. Also, your link to your web page had nothing to do with your posted screed.
“With all of these options, who should be responsible for her decisions, other than the one that made them?”
And who should have to suffer the consequences of her choices, other than the one that made them, and not some innocent third party that she created through said choices?
ph
Something is fishy...
I believe the female fetus should decide.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.