Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress seeks to jack up fees on home heating oil in midst of frigid winter
The Washington Times ^ | February 2, 2014 | Jacqueline Klimas

Posted on 02/03/2014 12:36:01 PM PST by ZULU

Congress‘ mammoth farm bill restores the imposition of an extra fee on home heating oil, hitting consumers in cold-weather states just as utility costs are spiking.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; farmbill; homeheating; homeheatingoil; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: ZULU

Tried to access their website (not the article but the organization that this money is funding)

Seems like most of the pages are unavailable.


21 posted on 02/03/2014 12:50:22 PM PST by nascarnation (I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Don’t know about those two but my natural gas bill just doubled from a frigid January last year!


22 posted on 02/03/2014 12:51:55 PM PST by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Freeze in the dark, peasants, and thank your betters for it.


23 posted on 02/03/2014 12:52:02 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

DOT you mean. It’s a long narrow transparent straw and if it comes out of the tank red you’re dead.
I have had this done at a road check.

Ain’t nothing a sweet as a long nose “ Pete”


24 posted on 02/03/2014 12:52:12 PM PST by South Dakota (shut up and build a bakken pipe line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Global corporations want to bust the small farmer, they want all the land.

I know sounds like a conspiracy theory.

So What!


25 posted on 02/03/2014 12:53:22 PM PST by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Well the Republicans in the House won’t allow something like that to happen. Oh wait they are all RINO’s. Nevermind. :-)


26 posted on 02/03/2014 12:54:55 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

The EXEMPT Congress is smart enough
and has enough mendacity
to make “laws” for others from which THEY,
THEIR FAMILIES, and THEIR STAFF are exempt.


27 posted on 02/03/2014 12:55:29 PM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

I do not know how they tax it. However, commercial diesel fuel for fishing boats puts out exhaust fumes that are a different color that regular diesel for highway trucks & cars. There is no federal or state highway tax on this fuel. I believe you can also use this in your commercial farm tractors, combines, etc.

If you get caught with it in the tank of your sailboat or other personal craft it is a big fine.


28 posted on 02/03/2014 12:57:03 PM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: South Dakota

Well, DOT then. But if they can impound your vehicle/etc, they’re not too much different than LEOs.

They relaxed after katrina for a bit since the fuel situation was so dire.


29 posted on 02/03/2014 12:59:08 PM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Exactly.


30 posted on 02/03/2014 1:02:36 PM PST by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

True. You are right about the LEOs


31 posted on 02/03/2014 1:06:16 PM PST by South Dakota (shut up and build a bakken pipe line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
The heating oil fee was backed by Northeast lawmakers who said it would fund important research to benefit consumers

There you go, someone is getting a kickback.

32 posted on 02/03/2014 1:08:26 PM PST by hadaclueonce (Because Brawndo's got electrolytes. Because Ethanol has Big Corn Lobby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
Omnibus Bills should be unconstitutional.

Omnibus is very ominous...

Locally, in my town government, we now regularly see an all-encompassing one-humongous budget to vote on at town meeting. Basically, all the town employees join with town leftists that believe in big government, come the 1st night to town meeting, and place one vote, for the "town budget" no matter what is inside it.

33 posted on 02/03/2014 1:09:20 PM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963

Here in PA, we have ag-approved, non-taxed diesel fuel, for farm use, and it’s dyed red/pink. If you get caught with it in a commercial vehicle, unless it’s a farm truck, it’s a fined offense. When I had my Family Farm Business, all my farming & construction equipment ran on it, but personal vehicles were gas-powered.


34 posted on 02/03/2014 1:13:02 PM PST by Carriage Hill (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

The bill prohibits oil companies from passing the fee on to consumers, but taxpayer advocates said that’s a sham and that the money has to come from consumers.

More proof congress doesn’t understand economics...


35 posted on 02/03/2014 1:16:51 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

I am familiar with it because all the lobster fishing boats out on the ocean put out a different color exhaust than pleasure boats.


36 posted on 02/03/2014 1:39:09 PM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ZULU; All
Thank you for referencing that article ZULU.

I haven't seen the farm bill, so I'm not sure why Congress is calling it a farm bill. But as mentioned in related threads, this bill has significant constitutional problems imo.

More specifically, regardless what FDR's pro-unconstitutionally big federal government activist justices wanted citizens to think about the scope of Congress's Commerce Clause powers in Wickard v. Filburn, both Thomas Jefferson and the Supreme Court had previously clarified that Congress has no business sticking its big nose into intrastate commerce. Using terms like "does not extend" and "exclusively," Jefferson had essentially indicated that intrastate commerce is off limits to Congress.

“For the power given to Congress by the Constitution does not extend to the internal regulation of the commerce of a State, (that is to say of the commerce between citizen and citizen,) which remain exclusively (emphasis added) with its own legislature; but to its external commerce only, that is to say, its commerce with another State, or with foreign nations, or with the Indian tribes.” –Thomas Jefferson, Jefferson’s Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank : 1791.

But since enemies of the Constitution will argue that the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution is the only one that matters, please note the following. The Supreme Court later reflected on Jefferson's words by clarifying the following limits on Congress's Commerce Clause powers. Not only does Congress have no constitutional authority to interefere with intrastate commerce, but Congress cannot tax such commerce.

”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress. (emphases added)” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

And since bill in question is a farm bill, note that before Constitution-ignoring FDR had a chance to establish an activist justice majority, Constitution-respecting justices had clarified the following about "government" power to regulate agriculture. Expressed in terms of the 10th Amendment nonetheless, justices had essentially clarified that the states had never delegated to Congress, via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate intrastate agriculture.

“From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited. None to regulate agricultural production is given, and therefore legislation by Congress for that purpose is forbidden (emphasis added).”—Mr. Justice Roberts(?), United States v. Butler, 1936.

Note that I have yet to find a reference to United States v. Butler in the Wickard v. Filburn opinion, corrections welcome.

The reason that corrupt federal lawmakers have been getting away with usurping state powers and stealing associated state revenues in the form of constitutionally indefensible federal taxes as evidenced by this farm bill is the following imo. Sadly, parents are not making sure that their children are being taught about the federal government's constitutionally limited powers as the Founding States had intended for those powers to be understood.

37 posted on 02/03/2014 1:50:41 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

bastards.


38 posted on 02/03/2014 2:03:34 PM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963

The FET of $.0015 is on every gallon.


39 posted on 02/03/2014 2:16:20 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks ("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

2/10 of cent per gallon. It’s not really the fee, but one more stinking form for the companies to fill out and track.


40 posted on 02/03/2014 2:19:36 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson