Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ninth Circuit strikes California’s restrictive rule against licensed carry of handguns
The Washington Post ^ | 2/13/2014 | David Kopel

Posted on 02/13/2014 6:24:25 PM PST by Beave Meister

The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Peruta v. San Diego, released minutes ago, affirms the right of law-abiding citizens to carry handguns for lawful protection in public.

California law has a process for applying for a permit to carry a handgun for protection in public, with requirements for safety training, a background check, and so on. These requirements were not challenged. The statute also requires that the applicant have “good cause,” which was interpreted by San Diego County to mean that the applicant is faced with current specific threats. (Not all California counties have this narrow interpretation.) The Ninth Circuit, in a 2-1 opinion written by Judge O’Scannlain, ruled that Peruta was entitled to Summary Judgement, because the “good cause” provision violates the Second Amendment.

The Court ruled that a government may specify what mode of carrying to allow (open or concealed), but a government may not make it impossible for the vast majority of Californians to exercise their Second Amendment right to bear arms.

Eugene Volokh may be too modest to say so, but the Court cites him four times, to his articles Implementing the Right to Keep and Bear Arms for Self-Defense: An Analytical Framework and a Research Agenda, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 1443 (2009); and The First and Second Amendments, 109 Colum. L. Rev. Sidebar 97 (2009). I got one cite, for The Second Amendment in the Nineteenth Century, 1998 B.Y.U. L. Rev 1359 (1998). [Other modern scholars cited were Nelson Lund, Stephen Halbrook, Clayton Cramer, Joseph Olson, and Joyce Malcolm, all of whom are familiar to longtime VC readers.]

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: banglist; beararms; california; ccw; concealandcarry; gunlaws; guns; judiciary; ninthcircuit; secondamendment; selfdefense; wapo
Oh no, does this now mean the Dems will just make up a new law to counter this ruling?
1 posted on 02/13/2014 6:24:26 PM PST by Beave Meister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

and the RATS, take another one in the.........HA ha!!!

2 posted on 02/13/2014 6:28:57 PM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

I’d be happy to slap a couple six shooters on like when I was a kid. A couple of nice Colts.


3 posted on 02/13/2014 6:29:04 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

Wow, some sanity out of the Ninth Circuit.


4 posted on 02/13/2014 6:32:03 PM PST by American Guesser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

***Oh no, does this now mean the Dems will just make up a new law to counter this ruling? ***

Of course they will or already have, just like they have circumvented the will of the VOTERS who, thirty two years ago, REJECTED Prop 15, which would have banned the selling of handguns in California.

The firing pin imprint law has killed new handgun ownership in Cali as gun companies are no longer selling their guns in Cali.


5 posted on 02/13/2014 6:40:55 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

My husband had several guns and my favorite was a NICE little Baretta. He carried it and we lived (Husband gone now.) in California. I sure LIKE it.


6 posted on 02/13/2014 6:52:36 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

Still, “The statute also requires that the applicant have “good cause,””. I must have missed whatever the Constitution had to say about that.


7 posted on 02/13/2014 6:58:45 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

thank God and mr. volokh.

hopefully now my wife will be able to apply.


8 posted on 02/13/2014 7:00:03 PM PST by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

The ninth circuit is not known as a conservative circuit. This looks good.


9 posted on 02/13/2014 7:06:10 PM PST by billhilly (Has Pelosi read it yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

A win for the good guys!


10 posted on 02/13/2014 7:43:57 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

I’m waiting for an ambush!! Seems fishy!


11 posted on 02/13/2014 8:35:15 PM PST by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

There is NO WAY this is going to stand. If anything the 9th circus is colluding with democrat libs to ensure the 2nd amendment is obsolete in the golden state. As much as I’d love to celebrate this decision I just can’t get too excited.


12 posted on 02/13/2014 8:38:26 PM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

“The firing pin imprint law has killed new handgun ownership in Cali as gun companies are no longer selling their guns in Cali.”

Not true yet. Plenty of handguns are still okay for sale.

http://certguns.doj.ca.gov/safeguns_resp.asp


13 posted on 02/13/2014 9:37:03 PM PST by chrisinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chrisinoc

Link no work.

Ruger and S&W have pulled out. Will Colt follow? Will those that stay have the firing pin micro stamped?

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/01/26/smith-wesson-to-stop-selling-some-pistols-in-california-due-to-gun-law/


14 posted on 02/13/2014 9:48:41 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

The Morons in the state capital screwed themselves when the passed a law making open carry illegal. As such in order to bear arms would require concealed carry. Since counties and cities restrict concealed carry or require a permit they are infringing upon the right to bear arms. They left no room for the Court. In the end it would mean even a permit is infringing or limiting a person’s right to bear. So either the State throws out their stupid open carry law or California and just became an unrestricted carry state or at a minimum a shall issue state with no reason needed to justify the need for concealed carry permit. Then again where does it say your have the right to keep and obtain a permit to carry


15 posted on 02/13/2014 9:49:23 PM PST by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
Ruger and S&W have not pulled out of CA yet.

Try this link:

http://certguns.doj.ca.gov/

16 posted on 02/13/2014 10:10:15 PM PST by chrisinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

“Oh no, does this now mean the Dems will just make up a new law to counter this ruling? “

They’ll try.


17 posted on 02/13/2014 10:13:06 PM PST by Pelham (If you donÂ’t deport itÂ’s amnesty by default.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
The ninth circuit is not known as a conservative circuit. This looks good.

It depends on the judge. It's a very large circuit with many judges. Judge O'Scannlain is one of its conservatives.

18 posted on 02/14/2014 10:12:46 AM PST by neverdem (Register pressure cookers! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

This is a big deal. It’s not chat.


19 posted on 02/14/2014 10:14:14 AM PST by neverdem (Register pressure cookers! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Have leftards explained yet how the cops will find the shell casings for a revolver?


20 posted on 02/14/2014 11:28:55 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chrisinoc

That is only firearms that have passed California’s drop test. The new law now requires firing pin microstamping.

S&W and Ruger have said they will not comply and will not sell such firearms in Cali.


21 posted on 02/14/2014 1:25:52 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Why wait? Unless you live in one of the open carry prohibited states like CA or TX or FL, you can do it today.


22 posted on 02/14/2014 3:15:02 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Having some small say in who gets to hold the whip doesn't make you any less a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

The ninth displays sanity. Surprised but happy.


23 posted on 02/14/2014 4:55:31 PM PST by Carry me back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson