credit Greg Nash
Posted on 02/15/2014 4:42:27 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
credit Greg Nash
Conservatives in Iowa and New Hampshire are preparing a hero’s welcome for Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) after he showed up Senate Republican leaders during a crucial vote on the debt limit.
Cruz infuriated his Senate Republican colleagues this week when he filibustered a clean bill to raise the debt limit. His objection forced Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) and 11 other Republicans to vote with Democrats to advance the legislation.
But in Iowa and New Hampshire, two important presidential primary states, conservative activists are cheering Cruz’s stand and buzzing about a possible presidential run in 2016.
Activists in the two states said they plan to show Cruz their appreciation when he visits in March and April.
“A tickertape parade,” said Steve Deace, a conservative radio host based in Iowa when asked what kind of reception Cruz will receive from activists next month.
“At this point with grassroots conservatives around the country it’s a close vote between who they distrust the most, the president, [Speaker] John Boehner [R-Ohio] or Mitch McConnell,” he said.
Ann Ray Trimble, a conservative activist in Iowa, said she and her allies are thrilled that Cruz took on his colleagues.
“It plays very well because the rank-and-file conservative in Iowa is a law-and-order person who believes, as Sen. Cruz stated in his objection, that the rules are the rules, the laws are the laws, and we need to follow them and not break them for political expediency.”
Cruz will speak on March 18 at a homeschooling rally hosted by the Network of Iowa Christian Home Educators in Des Moines.
On April 12, he will attend the New Hampshire Freedom Summit, an event sponsored by Americans For Prosperity, a Tea Party-allied group, along with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, two other potential candidates for president in 2016.
Greg Moore, the state director of Americans for Prosperity-New Hampshire, said conservative activists who will gather at the rally applauded Cruz’s action and want to see more transparency in Washington.
“They want to see people take a stand one way or the other. ‘Where do you stand on spending? How serious are you about spending?’ Fiscal issues are huge in New Hampshire,” said Moore.
“Our activists want to see a great deal of accountability,” he added. “They would look at any opportunity bringing accountability as positive for Sen. Cruz.”
Cruz’s Republican colleagues, however, did not appreciate his filibuster. They held a tense and angry meeting Wednesday afternoon at which McConnell proposed waiving the 60-vote threshold normally required to advance legislation, according to sources familiar with the session.
Cruz stood up and declared he would not let his fellow Republicans to escape responsibility for advancing the debt-limit bill. He said he would force at least five Republicans to vote with Democrats to overcome the procedural hurdle.
A Senate Republican aide described the meeting as “very contentious.”
Cruz further inflamed his colleagues by accusing them of trying to mislead the public after the vote.
“In the 13 months I’ve been in the Senate it has become apparent to me the single thing that Republican politicians hate and fear the most … is when they’re forced to tell the truth. It makes their heads explode,” Cruz told conservative radio host Mark Levin. “The Republicans members of the Senate, they all wanted the perfect show vote.”
“They should be totally pissed at him,” said Fergus Cullen, the former chairman of the New Hampshire Republican Party, when asked about the reaction of Cruz’s colleagues. “For him to do this after being in the Senate for one year, he’s obviously not preparing himself for a long career in the Senate.”
Cullen acknowledged that Cruz’s tactics would likely win over conservative activists but questioned whether he has come to be viewed by centrists as too far to the right.
“I do think objectively it probably plays pretty well to the base,” he said.
“What’s your long-term aim?” Cullen added. “Are you interested in getting elected nationally? All you’re doing right now is setting up a political career that will hit its ceiling very quickly, and it’s a pretty low ceiling.”
If Cruz were to win the GOP nomination in 2016, he would need resounding support from the party’s most conservative voters. He could face stiff competition from Paul and perhaps Huckabee, who won the Iowa caucuses in 2008.
Chip Saltsman, a Republican strategist who managed Huckabee’s 2008 presidential campaign, predicted Cruz would have a difficult challenge trying to explain his procedural moves in the Senate to voters in Iowa and New Hampshire.
“At the end of the day Ted Cruz made McConnell have a 60-vote limit and the debt ceiling still passed. It’s not like he stopped the debt limit from being passed,” he said.
Cruz’s procedural tactics have angered his GOP colleagues throughout his short Senate career. They blasted him for waging a high-profile fight in the fall to link a government funding resolution to an effort to halt the implementation of ObamaCare.
He irked some of them in early 2013 by insisting, along with fellow Tea Party-allied conservatives, on a 60-vote threshold to proceed to a debate on gun control legislation.
Gun-rights advocates later credited Cruz for helping to defeat expanded background checks because the procedural vote offered a useful map of which Republicans might have been sympathetic to the Democratic reform proposal.
He has single handedly put the business as usual crowd on their collective asses and turned the system on it's head and is laying waste to the status quo, armed with nothing but principle and courage.
And you compare him to Obama???
He is Sampson with a jawbone destroying the Philistines. A political Rambo.
Keep your eye on this one, it might just open.
Ted Cruz Ping!
If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
Walker has a real problem with Comprehensive Immigration Reform and Amnesty.
You're just now realizing that? Where have you been?
The Establishment trolls have already begun posting on Free Republic.
So what exactly did I say that was wrong? A President Cruz could compromise? The Democrats won't filibuster everything he proposes? Can you be more specific please?
Thank you. Maine’s other socialist, Angus King, voted yes also.
I’m trying to understand the point the poster is presenting, in that we need one with experience.
So to that point, the GOPe put up Romney, who clearly had experience. They put up McCain, another who had experience. They tried Dole, definately had experience.
I say we go with a man who has honesty and integrity, and yes, a level of experience that is tangible.
No one is going to change naps mind, it’s clear as day.
Tell the truth!...are u Karl Rove or just being paid by him??....One thing for sure...you're no conservative...maybe u should spread your liberal GOP-E talking points somewhere else..they wont fly very well here
LMAO....truest post of the day! (expect him to chime in on EVERY Cruz thread..that's the dead giveaway)
That's just plain offensive.
You are comparing a man who lied about who he was, hid what he really believed, and pretended he would do what he never intended to do, with what appears to be a principled conservative, one who wants to put conservative principles in to place, one who HAS actually stood for his beliefs, one who loves everything about America and stands for its founding principles.
I wouldn't mind if Walker was our nominee, but your ridiculous comparison is just odious........
Actually, that's not a true description of what Reagan did.
Reagan convinced the American public that conservative ways were what should be implemented to fix the problems we faced. The public let the dems know they agreed with Reagan. Reagan took every inch he possibly could from them, winning the vast majority of what he wanted. He talked with them, he lobbied with them, but never really WORKED with them the way you are describing.
I see no reason why Cruz couldn't do that as well.
Another useless newby running your mouth. Completely useless post. No wonder you are such a terrible debater.
Amen to your whole post!
You don't think the political climate in this country hasn't changed over the past three decades? The Democrats, and a percentage of the Republicans, in Washington would rather eat their own young than work with a President Cruz.
The idea that you can't persuade America to back conservative principles by winning the argument over truth is naïve.
Actually I did and saw that you weren’t new here, but read it as yep, I am new here. Sorry misread your page. Have a good weekend. Until we debate again. Take care.
” - - - “In the 13 months I’ve been in the Senate it has become apparent to me the single thing that Republican politicians hate and fear the most … is when they’re forced to tell the truth. It makes their heads explode,” Cruz told conservative radio host Mark Levin. “The Republicans members of the Senate, they all wanted the perfect show vote.” - - - “
Yup. Well said Senator Cruz, well said.
Now if only a Republican US House Member would say something similar about the US House of Representatives, the Republican Party could shed its obsolete RINO ball and chain, and FINALLY give the voters a real choice in 2014!
Up to this point he's won my allegiance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.