Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: carriage_hill

I thought I had read that he fired off - as was often the case in duels, but that Burr did not, which is why many even on his side were upset at him....gotta go dig.


25 posted on 02/17/2014 5:40:33 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: reed13k

ah...a matter of contention.

Quickly from Wikipedia:
“David O. Stewart, in his biography of Burr, American Emperor, notes that the reports of Hamilton’s intentionally missing Burr with his shot only began to appear in newspaper reports published in papers friendly to Hamilton in the days after his death. However Ron Chernow, in his biography, “Alexander Hamilton”, states Hamilton told numerous friends of his intention to avoid firing at Burr well before the duel.[13] Additionally, according to Chernow, Hamilton wrote a number of letters dated before the duel that also attest to this intention. The two shots, witnesses reported, followed one another in close succession, and none of those witnesses could agree as to who fired first.”


27 posted on 02/17/2014 5:45:45 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: reed13k

Not-so-accurate (self-admission) Wiki:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burr–Hamilton_duel#The_Duel


33 posted on 02/17/2014 6:14:31 AM PST by Carriage Hill (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson