Posted on 02/22/2014 2:15:25 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
In reality Obama does as he pleases and when he pleases.
Obama is described by what HE DOES not what his detractors “remain free” to do. Obama is in fact on the traditional arc for Evil.
“, including her attempt to portray criticism of her “speech” (her gun sights over Democratic districts prior to the Arizona massacre) as “blood libel”.
1) They werent gun sights. They were surveyor marks, moron
2) she wasnt referring to criticism of her speech as “blood libel”. After the shooting, liberals in and out of the news media were pointing fingers at those of us on the right, trying to pin blame on us (when the shooter was a left winger). Thats what she was accurately calling a blood libel. Falsely blaming a crime on a group of people who had nothing to do with it.
This loser a negroid?
Didn’t a certain hag say “dissent is patriotic”? Hmmmm, I forgot what her name was but it rhymes with Nazi’..
The psychological term for this is projection. What this liberal is really saying here is that she would like to throw all Conservatives into a concentration camp if she could get away with it. I'll bet O'Bastard feels the same way.
This loser a negroid?
Ya gotta read the few comments at the link! They’re a hoot!
A few years ago dissent was patriotic, now it is almost treason. lol
Well, first off Obama isn’t a Dictator. He’s a Tyrant. Tyrant is one step from Dictator.
As for Noam Chomsky, don’t worry about him. A genius he may be on linguistics, but he’s been outed as a Socialist disguising as an anarchist disguising as a left leaning libertarian — tending towards actually Communist and outed for a long time, and full of confirmation biases.
Nobody really quotes him today, nor listens to his political views anymore. Aside from his academics, history will have little use for him in the political and philosophical categories.
Sarah seems to have all the right enemies, doesn’t she?
The reasoning - that arresting political opponents equals dictatorship - does provide a bright line, and there is a certain usefulness to this. By this argument, Madura of Venezuela is a dictator but Vladimir Putin isn’t.
However, the real world is characterized by a continuum. Usually, a graduates incrementally from democratic to dictatorial. Madura, in Venezuela, came very close to absolutely disarming the people. Democrats, in the U.S., want to take steps in that direction.
Generally, the opposition party is more sensitive to civil liberties than the ruling party. With some notable exceptions, it was the Democrats who criticized Bush for trampling on the Constitution, just as today it is the Republicans who criticize Obama.
People who deny such things as shades of grey and the role of the opposition in a democracy merely display their ignorance of how the world works.
1 : an expression of real or pretended doubt or uncertainty especially for rhetorical effect
2 : a logical impasse or contradiction; especially : a radical contradiction in the import of a text or theory that is seen in deconstruction as inevitable
I was curious too, so I looked it up.
The most amazing thing about this article is that it appears “journalists” like Sarah Jones believe the regime can and will protect them.
bttt
That he hasn't succeeded doesn't mean he isn't trying.
I’ve never called Obama Hitler. I’ve said he is an affirmative action Hitler. A rather incompetent copy of the original with some of Hitler’s speech making capability without Hitler’s skill of giving a speech by memory.
Sarah is WARNING us of Obama's actions, which are bordering on the dictatorial, by pointing out Obama's pronouncements and Executive Orders. These show that he has no intention of being held to the laws of this country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.