Posted on 02/27/2014 5:22:44 AM PST by Kaslin
Continue telling the truth and challenging the lib talking points just don’t use derogatory names or loose composure. The press will always spin it badly.
What about photographers that actually have to take part in the wedding to take pictures?
So coercion of businesses is fine with this guy.
‘RIV3RS?’ What does that spell/mean?
For any philosophy—whether reasonable or silly, accurate or absurd, good or evil—there are going to be stupid people who agree with it. And they will say stupid things on behalf of it. For propagandists opposed to such a philosophy, this fact will be used to discredit it. Our goal should be to point out the fallacy in this kind of argument.
Obama and his ilk can denigrate us as Bible Thumpers, clinging to our Guns and Bibles; we can’t say anything that upsets them (or their media).
Obama’s Holder says he’ll only prosecute White-on-black crimes as hate crimes; we can’t say that blacks are the primary instigators of the knockout game.
Frankly, I’m tire of the advice. It does not make one whit of a difference. Whatever our response, or feelings, or anything, the left will ALWAYS find a way to make it derogatory, inflammatory, racist or homophobic. Always.
I’m damned tired of tippy-toeing, myself. I think I want some “get-in-your-face” confrontation like Obama tells HIS supporters. [I didn’t even mention the knife-fight/gun option he implied]
I didn’t say don’t get in their face. You just can’t call them a mongrel or such things in this day of PC crap.
Conservatives need to stop apologizing and just double down.
Apparently you haven’t watched anything on MSNBC or any of the other shows where their guests and host regularly refer to the Tea Party, for example, with equally disturbing epithets. I’m not buying it.
That's what democrats do.
Democrats goof up as much, or more, as conseratives but the media gives them as much cover as possible.
I don’t watch any news channel with an alphabet name.
Mongrel? Way too kind. The steaming turd kenyan dictator is the son of a pig f’n dog. PC crap it is. As another poster said, double down like the democrat party.
GOP proud is still raging on about RNC Committeeman Dave Agema reminding people that opposition to gay marriage is in the party platform. He says he’ll continue to stand by it even if it is just meaningless voter bait in the eyes of the GOPe.
As far as women’s issues are concerned conservative men should not shut up. That is just democrats trying to silence half the competition. Democrats certainly don’t demand that liberal men shut up about women’s issues.
Be smart but be bold.
not only that but he doesn’t understand that people with religious convictions want no part in helping someone else commit sin.
“The press will always spin it badly.”
Anything a non-Liberal says will be negatively spun by the Media.
Lived with it.
“Ted Nugent called President Obama a “subhuman mongrel.”
But he is. It’s the truth. It’s a proven fact that Obama
lies, cheats, steals and has total disregard for human life.
He’s godless and he is totally intent on bringing all of
humanity down to serfdom. He is a champion of tyranny and
absolute control of life and death over the human race.
Subhuman:
not having or showing the level of kindness, intelligence, etc., that is expected of normal human beings
Mongrel:
A mongrel or mutt is a dog that is not the result of breeding and belongs to no breed. Wiki.
Even Wikipedia agrees.
So we cancel out each other I guess.
“You just can’t call them a mongrel or such things in this day of PC crap.”
Perhaps you can’t (or won’t).
I can, as this example illustrates:
As the President has been called a “mongrel”, in effect a “bastard”, the only way to settle the issue is for the President to unseal his records.
As the lawyers say, “Strict proof is demanded.”
As for the “sub-human” part, Barack Hussein Obama is pro Muslim, sufficient reason to apply the following: “If you support a Muslim, you are a Muslim.”
There is nothing less humane than a Muslim, hence a case for the application of “sub-human” to Obama can logically and rationally made.
;-)
Okay, Mr. Hunter, let's play a game. Ted Cruz is also speaking at CPAC. Who will get a better reception? You guess first.
"There should be a simple requirement for sponsorship - your group is some sort of conservative."
"Some sort of conservative" is how we get born losers like John McCain and Mitt Romney as Presidential nominees. I'm waiting for the where the first and third letters in CPAC take precedence over the second and fourth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.