Skip to comments.Republicans gain momentum in close fight for U.S. Senate
Posted on 03/08/2014 1:40:52 PM PST by Clintonfatigued
Eight months before the November 4 elections, Republicans have expanded the number of competitive races for U.S. Senate seats and have a growing chance of gaining control of that chamber and stalling Democratic President Barack Obama's second-term agenda.
Public dissatisfaction with the president, concerns about his healthcare overhaul and a sluggish economy, and a series of retirements by key Democratic senators in conservative states have made a rugged year for Democrats even more so, analysts and strategists in both parties say.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
It’s promising but not guaranteed. The patriotic grass roots needs to get out and make it happen.
Your inbox will soon be filled with dozens of posts by whining rotters who will crow about how were are doomed, doooooooooooooooooooomed to defeat!
Since it appears Lamar! will win renomination, he will do so without my vote again in either the primary or the general. 5th most liberal Republican representing a Conservative state like mine is disgusting (and he has his pimps out telling people how “Conservative” he is when his votes tell another story). A damnable liar whose mantra in his book was “two terms and out.”
Execrable establishment RINOs like him are why it makes no difference which party is in power because nothing will change. It’s the same crap when we had 2 Democrats from Tennessee. Voting wrong and coming back every 6 years to say how “Conservative” they are.
Drudge is running an interesting poll today letting people vote their pick for the GOP presidential candidate. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz are about tied and between them have nearly 60% of the 59K votes cast so far.
There is a state Representative running in the primary. Maybe you could vote for him and perhaps give yard signs to your close friends and relatives.
Who do you have “ahead” of Lamar? Collins, Kirk, Murkowski, and ?
Now you’ll get some posts saying that this is very bad news.
I’m aware of Joe Carr’s campaign. I’m voting for him. He also has almost NO money and as a result, no momentum. We also have the serious problem of open primaries with Democrat interference and NO runoffs. It’s no surprise that we’ve ended up with three RINOs in the Senate and Governor’s office (the latter being only marginally better, if only because the legislature could override him easily if he went full Sundquist).
I also don’t have any relatives in TN, besides my parents. I’ve tried to lobby my uncle to vote for McDaniel in MS, but he won’t do it, saying Cochran helped him with his job some time ago.
A new poll in NH shows Scott Brown trailing by 13 points. With these numbers Brown might not even get in the race. NH is purple trending blue. Sad to see this once great state lost.
We see the same thing in CO, VA, NV, & NM....all lost to the left.
I was looking at an article that had him ranked 40th in the Senate, but I didn’t see the names bringing up the bottom. It’s possible Cochran may be in that group.
If Obamanationcare can't be repealed, hoping for gridlock on the rest of the dictator's nefarious schemes.
The Suffolk poll which you learned of is not the most reliable poll around. It’s still winnable and Brown hasn’t even entered the race yet.
We have a lot of opportunities to choose from.
The Suffolk poll has had its ups & downs. And of course it’s early & Brown is not in yet, but NH is moving away from us at a shocking rate. Look at the 2 reps. The idiot Shea-Porter & the radical Kuster.....those 2 could never get elected state-wide in NH 10 or 15 years ago.
That would appear to be the national journal rankings (Numbers for last year only). They have him at 40th in terms of “most conservative”, tied with Lindsey Graham (so there is no 41). They have Kirk AHEAD of him at 36th though so...yeah, I don’t know about that. They have McCain to his left at 43rd most Conservative. Collins is 45, Murkowski is 44. Roy Blunt is 42 (I don’t know if he’s that bad but he needs to go).
Cochran is way up at 34.
The Union - Leader (the newspaper that took Muskie out in 72) is not the paper it was. the paper - Much Conservative when Loeb was alive is now moderate.
<><> Bill Clinton never had sex w/ "that woman,"
<><> Obama said "keep your plan" 29 times to get reelected,
<><> Harry Reid said everyone claiming to be hurt by O/Care is a liar,
<><>Hillary Clinton got fired from the Watergate Commission for lying
<><> Nancy Pelosi swore everything Obama said about O'Care was accurate,
<><> Debbie Wasssername Schultz said Democrats are gonna run and win on the glories of O/Care.
The republican party and their brilliant campaign consultants have a history of taking leads to mean it’s time to start coasting to the finish line.
Same thing going on here in South Carolina with linda graham. She’s such a “conservative.” Right.
Brown is kind of a RINO but he does have a history of coming from behind, as he did in that shocking surprise in the special election to fill the late Ted Kennedy's Senate seat.
One good reason why Brown is now trailing is lack of name recognition vs. the 'Rat incumbent. Merely entering the race and the attention that event alone might generate can get him closer or even put him ahead.
Gardener is gonna win in CO.
As I said before I don’t like the idea of running Brown in NH, (he should run in MA) but since the NH GOP has nothing else to offer, I can’t object.
Kirk is up for re-election in 2016. It being Illinois I don't see him being re-elected.
He was the senator from the Massachusetts and you think he doesn't have name recognition in New Hampshire? I think it's more due to him being a carpetbagger. Not every state is a New York who welcomes them with open arms.
Kirk is protected by the Combine, same as Durbin.
> “He also has almost NO money ...”
And there it is.
Liberals have boatloads of money obtained illicitly.
You are right. The Union Leader is a center-right paper these days. With TV & electronic media in place they no longer control the message in the state.
Kirk is what passes for a Republican in the bluest of Blue states. Plus it's a presidential election year. And there's his health issue. I'd say he's toast.
The Suffolk poll is based on Massholes disregard. Scott Brown is a wussy, NH will love him. All three Conservatives that is.
Naah, there’s real Republicans in Illinois. He was the fakest of the bunch. He’s a puppet of the same political clique that elevated Zero to power, too. If the GOP gets a majority this year, the Combine will need to keep Kirk in there. They’re also going to anoint another Combiner RINO (and Rahm Emanuel buddy) in Rauner as Governor this year to replace the current Combiner Democrat. All one big happy corrupt bipartisan cabal in Illinois.
If the GOP takes over the Senate this year then the Democrats will make it a point to target Kirk and beat him. They'll run Simon or Duckworth or some African-American candidate and pick the seat back up.
He was only in the Senate for a short time and he's been out for a while now. Most voters have a very poor historical memory when it comes to politics, which is a major reason why 'Rats win more elections than they otherwise would.
I believe that you will find the Palmetto people are as dense as the Cornball Texans when it comes to Loveable Lindsey, who will be easily re-nominated and then reelected. Palmettos and Lone Stars demand brand names, and there is nothing we can do about it.
But whoa unto the GOP if they again fail to deliver.
Scott Brown did more damage to Obamacare then Ted Cruz did.
And there's this:
linda needs 50% +1 in the primary to avoid a runoff. Her chances of that are flagging.
Never fear. The Republicans will enfranchise 20 million new Democrat voters before November.
Actually, we have an unabashedly pro-life and pro-gun Republican elected to a statewide office right now (Dan Rutherford, Illinois State Treasurer). He easily carried all the "moderate" suburbs where you supposedly to have worship Planned Parenthood and hate guns to be "electable". (the Mark Kirk fan club ignored that fact, of course). Anyway, that's more than can be said for "conservative" states like Virginia.
Unfortunately, the combine decided to destroy him because he opted to run for Governor this year without their blessing. Worse, a bunch of useful idiot Illinois "conservatives" believe whatever the liberal media tells them about Rutherford. The manufactured "sexual harassment scandal" will disappear once he's no longer running for office, like the ones the left used against Clarence Thomas and Herman Cain.
If the Senate is down to the wire and Kirk's seat could decide the majority, Kirk will pull a Jim Jeffords/Arlen Specter and announce he's switching parties because he "cannot in good conscience caucus with tea party extremists that have hijacked the Republican agenda". He'll hold a press conference with his fawning pals in the liberal media and tell everyone nothing has changed his party affliction and that he will continue to be "a voice for moderation within the Democratic caucus", then he will veer far to the left shortly afterwards. All the freepers who told us back in 2010 that Kirk is "with us when it counts" and laughed off the idea that Kirk would ever switch parties will be AWOL.
In the event Kirk has an epiphany, betrays his combine masters, and does NOT switch parties, I agree he'd be "toast" and they'd take him out with an official RAT party member.
Of course, I don't see a scenario unfolding where Kirk's seat will make the difference over who controls the Senate. Mostly likely, Illinois won't matter nationally in 2016, and Kirk will continue to do the Dem's bidding as a "Republican" Senator.
Brown is pro-abortion, pro-gay-marriage, and supports “sensible” gun control legislation.
I’ll not be voting for him in the primary or in the general.
Worse, I remember Brown stabbing us in the back on some "fiscal issues" where he was supposed to be "with us" and he didn't even have an excuse that he "had to" vote with the RATs, since polls showed the GOP position enjoyed widespread support.
But as Impy notes, unfortunately there aren't any other opinions in NH right now. Personally I think NH conservative groups ought to meet with Brown privately and get an agreement hammered out that they will back his candidacy IF he promises to votes more conservatively on some key issues than he did when he was a Massachuttes Senator. (He doesn't even need to campaign on those issues, just quietly move rightward once elected) His liberal record may have been typical for a Massachuttes "Republican", but is it to the left of even the "moderate" Republicans in N.H.