Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pastor Diagnosed With Cancer: 'No Compassion in the Affordable Care Act'
Weekly Standard ^ | March 18, 2014 | Daniel Halper

Posted on 03/18/2014 8:24:04 AM PDT by grundle

A pastor recently diagnosed with cancer, and who is covered under Obamacare, tells a local Iowa reporter that there's "no compassion in the Affordable Care Act."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVRLCLcZljY

"Back in January, Pastor Angran was diagnosed with stage three cancer of the esophagus. He had insurance, but because of a previous heart condition, it did not cover the treatments he needed for his cancer. He found that out just minutes before receiving life-saving chemo," says the local reporter.

The pastor says, "One of the workers came and said let me talk to you. And so I went to talk to her. She says that we found out that your insurance does not include chemo."

"Over the past two months, the Angrans have emptied their savings account and racked up $50,000 in debt. They signed up for the Affordable Care Act," says the local reporter, "but found it to be anything but affordable. It will cost the couple more than $800 per month, money they just don't have."

The reporter adds, "As a pastor, Angran has devoted his life to helping others, to being compassionate. He says, 'There's no compassion in the Affordable Care Act.'" Related Stories

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: obamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: VRW Conspirator

Tony Snow


61 posted on 03/19/2014 10:01:30 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: redleghunter

And it still only paid...I think it was 60% once all that was met. That is not insurance it is pure theft.


62 posted on 03/19/2014 12:12:16 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: redleghunter

A pre-existing heart condition should have no bearing on treating someone for cancer. Unless the said treatments would cause his heart to fail.


That, or otherwise reduce his chances to something minuscule right off the bat. Chemo is usually pretty hard on the body.

We have no indication of this.


We have no clear statement of it, but it’s an obvious reason. It would be a better article if a bunch of things were more clearly stated.


63 posted on 03/19/2014 1:12:09 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

The fact of the matter is that pre-existing conditions are covered under Obamacare.


They are covered to the extent that the treatments are covered, new or pre-existing. There are other articles than this one which describe the covered treatments narrowing from plans people had previously. The main ones I recall were complaining about the inability to cancel functionally useless plans.


64 posted on 03/19/2014 1:37:20 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sheana
And it still only paid...I think it was 60% once all that was met. That is not insurance it is pure theft.

When I retire later this year, I will fall under TriCare Prime. The annual family enrollment fee is •Family: $547.68 per year Then there are co-pays but they are really not steep at all: Tricare Copays

If I move out of the Prime area coverage or system then like many plans it is a 80%/20% deal.

Years ago I never thought being part of any military health care system active duty or retired was a good deal. Now after seeing Obamacare, I have a pretty good deal.

65 posted on 03/19/2014 3:04:10 PM PDT by redleghunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: redleghunter; lepton
A pre-existing heart condition should have no bearing on treating someone for cancer. Unless the said treatments would cause his heart to fail. We have no indication of this.

I agree, Redleghunter.

My father was in a position where oncologists refused chemo because they thought the chemo would hurt him more. The insurance company didn't refuse to pay for chemo; the doctors were making that decision.

If the pastor had a heart condition that could be worsened with chemo, an oncologist might decide not to treat him. He's receiving chemo, so his oncologist must have no objection to him receiving it. So, why would the insurance company object?

It really sounds as if, like I think you suggested earlier, his insurance plan through the church just was not a very good one. Hopefully people will help this pastor, run a fundraiser, etc., to help him pay off that big bill. Then he can focus on just getting well.

66 posted on 03/19/2014 9:13:58 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes

A potential solution the “old fashioned way”:

http://mychristiancare.org/medi-share/


67 posted on 03/19/2014 9:34:33 PM PDT by redleghunter (Jesus said: "it is written...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: redleghunter
My son was diagnosed with leukemia at age 10. The survival rate for his form of ALL is 94%. A no brainer to pursue the treatments no?

Absolutely a no-brainer right there. :-)

I was diagnosed with stage 3A colon cancer a couple of years ago at the age of 44.

A few years ago, I read that stage 3 colon cancer has a very good prognosis.

But, even if the survival rate were, say, 6%, fighting cancer is still worth a try because - who knows? - the patient could be in that 6%. Sadly, I had a relative (only 42 with two young sons) fighting a rare type of colon cancer the same year I was fighting cancer. Unfortunately, in her case, the specific type of cancer was particularly brutal. She fought so hard, but she didn't make it through the year. She was beautiful, by the way. And, with a young family to raise, she did everything she could to try to beat it - starting with chemo and, when it didn't work, her husband drove her everywhere looking for clinical trials. It was worth the try, for her sons' sake.

68 posted on 03/19/2014 9:48:44 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

This is about gross coverage eligibility, not about treatment protocols.


69 posted on 03/19/2014 9:54:32 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes

My sympathies on the loss of your friend. Heartbreaking, she was very young and the children...


70 posted on 03/20/2014 11:28:07 PM PDT by redleghunter (Jesus said: "it is written...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson