Don't forget their enablers, the GOPe. Let's vote more of 'em in! Yeeha!
"Follow me, boys!
Posted on 03/29/2014 8:02:51 AM PDT by shuck and yall
More like the worst domestic defeat for the cause of limited government in the history of the country.
Let’s stop pretending that Obama wasn’t the worse of two, twice. Uniparty my ass.
In January 2017, unprecedented, arbitrary, near dictatorial powers await the next White House occupant.
I’m with you. I don’t agree with your decision, but sometimes I wonder if some think maybe we should just let the voters have what they asked for and see how they like it.
Given that the gop and rats are just two factions in the same uniparty, why would I care which one wins?
Sorry. The old red flag blue flag thing isn’t going to rally the troops this time.
Get conservative candidates I can support and I’ll be happy to vote for them. Send out the same bunch of corporatist nancy boys and I’ll be otherwise occupied. It’s really that simple.
I voted for Romney as we’ll based on the same logic. In retrospect I should have stayed home. While of course there is no such thing as a perfect candidate that doesn’t mean that you should settle for abject mediocrity. I can think of several candidates I’d happily show up to vote for. Palin, Cruz, Paul, Walker... Pick any one and I’ll show.
If the gop wants to foist another of its corporatist nancy boys on us, it has every right to do so. And I have every right to find something else to do with my time rather than vote.
Wish they both could lose.
that may be your desire but alas it is not to be.
In the American system, we have two parties. All factions must join one of the two or just wither and die.
That means a choice must be made. Which party accepts most of your beliefs and political desires. That is where you must vote. There is a primary to narrow the field. Which of the candidates in the primary mots accurately effects your your thoughts? That is the candidate for whom you must vote.
What if he loses? The winner bcomes your candidate.
To turn your back on the winner is to refuse your duty to vote. Voting requires some times difficult decisions. Obama or Romney? To not make the decision and not to vote is a cop out, a turning on America.
I’m all for us ending the pretending...particularly that we have much if any voice in which candidates the uniparty elite will allow us to choose from. I really don’t think we’ll have much of a choice this next time, any more so than we did last time. But who knows?
I offer a simple bargain: provide a conservative candidate that I can vote for and I’ll show. Provide more of the same and I’ll find something else to do with my time.
You will have something else to do with your time, it will consist of figuring out what else you can live without as you pretend you had nothing to do with another election victory year for the Demagogic Party.
After reading this entire thread I see that the same people are still waiting for perfection. WILL NOT HAPPEN !
Get a grip folks and vote the Democrats out!
We can take care of the Republicans AFTER we get the Senate and the WH.
“If you don’t care whether Republicans win, care that Democrats lose.”
So what’s the difference?
Thank you, I wish more people would realize what Reagan meant by that...... but they won’t, they are too pure.
-—yep-—and the result of the “purity” is Obama——
yep...... and they sre stickin’ to it!
Bonehead, Cantor and McCarthy are responsible for quietly purging actually conservative Republican House Members for unspeakable crimes like opposing further increases in what is laughingly referenced as the "debt ceiling." The money of Texas construction zillionaires was applied liberally to fund the challenge of treasonweasel ex-TEA Party Chicago area Congresscritter Adam Kinzinger to defeat Don Manzullo, an 11 term incumbent and solid movement conservative.
Scott Brown be damned.
Ted Cruz is the future of this nation or this nation has no future.
I grant you that Denny Hastert was also a quisling and corruptocrat $$$$ oriented footstool for K Street lobbyists and said so here when he was Speaker. So is Paul Ryan.
GOP-Elite: When any old POS with an R after his or her name will suffice.
Not that I feel strongly about this or anything.
I will, if your boys buy another nomination, sit back, stay home and witness the farce. Eventually the GOP party sockpuppets and sleazebag quislings will get the message.
And you, Kevin Williamson, and the Editorial Board of the once conservative National Review well know that there is an increasing defection, with each passing POTUS election, of actually CONSERVATIVE voters.
BTW, this has little to do with Ron Paul. I would not have taken good money to vote for the likes of him either.
I have not and I shall not vote for any GOP-E POTUS candidate who is not rigidly: pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, pro-military and favorable to tax relief at every level of government for Americans of modest means. Next come the reduction of welfare state programs, Wall Street bailouts, Fed Reserve stock pumping schemes, etc.
If you want my vote and that of an increasing number of conservatives, then tell your GOP-E overlords that they can damn well nominate candidates worth voting for and not brain dead elitists or stooges for same.
How many people are waiting to be told how to vote by ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, NYT, WP, etc.,??? You are living in a previous era.
Between Mitt Romney and Obozo, there is not a dime's worth of difference except on the care and feeding of Muffy's trust fund. Both salivate over abortion, perversion posing as marriage, gun grabbing, starving the military, and Mittens invented Obozocare before Obozo was elected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.