Posted on 04/01/2014 4:06:17 AM PDT by Kaslin
Is the Republican Party's Middle East policy up for bid?
For four days ending Sunday, a quartet of presidential hopefuls trooped to Las Vegas to attend the annual gathering of the Republican Jewish Coalition.
Impresario: Sheldon Adelson, the Vegas-Macau casino mogul whose fortune is estimated at $39 billion -- 8th richest man on the planet -- and who dumped $92 million into the election of 2012.
Adelson kept Newt Gingrich alive with a $15 million infusion of ad money, gutting Romney, and then sank $30 million into Mitt's campaign.
This time Sheldon wants to buy himself a winner.
Ari Fleischer, press secretary to Bush 43, and a member of Adelson's RJC fiefdom, put it plain and simple: "The 'Sheldon Primary' is an important primary. ... anybody running for the Republican nomination would want to have Sheldon at his side."
One such man is Jeb Bush, son and brother to presidents, who was the prize bull at Sheldon's cattle show. Daniel Ruth of the Tampa Bay Times speculates on Jeb's motive in showing up:
"Would you slink into Las Vegas to schmooze gambling mogul Sheldon Adelson who regards GOP presidential nominees as if they were trophy heads mounted in his den, if you had no interest in the White House? Bush is not going to Vegas to catch Meat Loaf's act at Planet Hollywood."
The 2016 presidential hopefuls "are falling at his feet," said a veteran Republican strategist of the 80-year-old oligarch. Each of those who came -- Bush, Chris Christie, and Govs. Scott Walker and John Kasich -- apparently auditioned, one by one, before the godfather.
In 2016, says Adelson's top political adviser Andy Abboud, Sheldon's "bar for support is going to be much higher. ... There's going to be a lot more scrutiny."
Guess that means no more Newts.
Victor Chaltiel, a major donor and Adelson friend who sits on the board of Las Vegas Sands, tells us Sheldon "doesn't want a crazy extremist to be the nominee." Adds Shawn Steel, a big California GOP money man, Sheldon is a "very rational guy."
Perhaps. But last fall at Yeshiva University, this "very rational guy" gave this response to a question from Rabbi Shmuley Boteach on whether he supports U.S. negotiations on Iran's nuclear program:
"No. What do you mean support negotiations? What are we going to negotiate about? What I would say is, 'Listen, you see that desert out there, I want to show you something.' ... You pick up your cell phone and you call somewhere in Nebraska and you say, 'OK let it go.'
"So, there's an atomic weapon, goes over ballistic missiles, the middle of the desert, that doesn't hurt a soul. Maybe a couple of rattlesnakes, and scorpions, or whatever.
"And then you say, 'See! The next one is in the middle of Tehran. So, we mean business. You want to be wiped out? Go ahead and take a tough position and continue with your nuclear development.
"'You want to be peaceful. Just reverse it all, and we will guarantee that you can have a nuclear power plant for electricity purposes, energy purposes.'"
Adelson's response was recorded by Philip Weiss of Mondoweiss website who was at Yeshiva and filmed the interview. Weiss says the audience cheered Adelson's proposed nuclear strike on Iran and no one on the stage, not Wall Street Journal columnist Bret Stephens, peeped a word of dissent.
And this is a "very rational guy," who doesn't want "a crazy extremist to be the nominee"?
This is someone Republican presidential candidates must appease, if they don't want tens of millions in attack ads run against them?
This is someone the Republican presidential hopefuls must hearken to now?
Again, so it would seem.
During his talk before the few dozen members of the RJC, Gov. Chris Christie recounted his recent trip to Israel: "I took a helicopter ride from the occupied territories" and came "to understand the military risk that Israel faces every day."
Christie's effort at bonding boomeranged. An angry Morton Klein of the Zionist Organization of America confronted Christie to demand that he explain just what he meant by "occupied territories."
For half a century, the United States has considered the West Bank occupied land where Israeli settlements are illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention.
Whatever Christie's response, it did not satisfy the ZOA or Klein who declared: "Either [Christie] doesn't understand the issue, or he's hostile to Israel."
Whereupon Christie, in a private audience with Adelson, apologized.
A source close to Adelson told Politico that Christie made clear "that he misspoke when he referred to the 'occupied territories.' And he conveyed that he is an unwavering friend and committed supporter of Israel, and was sorry for any confusion that came across as a result of the misstatement."
The governor is a tough guy, but this sounds like groveling.
Is this what Republican presidential candidates must do now?
Kowtow to this fattest of fat cats who wants to buy himself an American war on Iran?
Is that what has become of the party of Reagan?
Big money has so corrupted politics in America that “we the people” really don’t matter anymore.
The Democrat sheep and low information voters allow Soros to pick their candidate but conservatives are not that stupid.
The solution is not restrictions on freedom of speech and how one spends one’s money. The solution is to so restrict the government’s activity that there would be little point in throwing big money at it. That would be how the Founders envisioned.
Precisely. If there's no power to buy and sell, the money won't chase it.
It is now impossible to restrict the government’s activity.
Such a belief is exactly why the GOP-E has thrown up their hands and joined Democrats in looting productive America. Simply armed robbery.
I guess it's hard to blame the guy. He's a big shot in an industry whose financial success is based on stupid people who don't know the futility of playing against the house.
Still no posts from the resident FR Israel lobby? They’ll be along shortly to tell us Adelson is right. Won’t they?
I actually agree with Adelson on Israel and Iran’s nuclear program. Iran has ALREADY said the same thing...they are blowing Israel off the map.
They haven’t threatened it just once.
And if Adelson is threatening them back, then so much the better.
Who is the best candidate for that posture?
No doubt in my mind it’s Ted Cruz or Sarah Palin, if that’s what Adelson really believes. Pacifist Paul wouldn’t even think of it, Christie is so dopey he goes to a Jewish meeting with Palestinian rhetoric, and Gingrich would do it but we already know he has too much baggage. Walker has courage...maybe he’d go there. Kasich is cold and calculating...maybe he’d go there.
Ted Cruz.
People thought he was kidding years ago when Pitchfork Pat said the left and right were natural allies:
Oliver Stone and ‘Jewish Domination’
American Thinker | 3-31-14 | Bruce Walker
Posted on 4/1/2014 8:29:51 AM by SJackson
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3139618/posts
Iran’s government has also promised to destroy America. Their parliament was chanting “Death to America” just a few months ago. We have a reason to stop their nuclear program.
Groveling? What groveling? You mean like, after Hurricane "Sandy", feeling up The Catamite and giving him tongue in the middle of 50,000 people?
Awwww, c'mon. The Governor is a tough guy, presidential timber if I ever saw any, tall and wide and ..... well, not wide so much, you know what I mean! He's got a big heart to go with his broad mind! And slurp skibble sneesh gobble snort gurgle gurgle mewww ....
Christie for President! At least he isn't Sarah Palin!!!
No, they said he was an antisemite, because Abe Foxman stood up and said Pat Buchanan is an antisemite for writing about Jewish politicians in less-than-respectful tones.
Like this, for instance. I think we'll be hearing from Abe about this one ..... I'm sure he has to be Gravely Concerned about certain overtones and so on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.