[Kenny]

Here it comes, the setup for Dems to win. The media and talking heads have all performed well touting a Republican wave in 2014, now it's time to start turning that around. So sad, I'm not sure we even have elections anymore or if our presence at the polls isn't all show for the predetermined results.

[GeronL]

If the GOPe continues it’s war on conservatives, many are going to be turned of from voting

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Only if the Community Agitators Formerly Known as ACORN get enough of their peeps to vote multiple times as dead people.

[Diogenesis]

Absolutely.

There is NO serious penalty for voting fifty times
— if you are with al Qaeda, a criminal illegal,
or a Democrat.

And preventing voters from voting
is a specialty of the DO”J” and its Black Panthers.

Election fraud is a SPECIALTY of the DO”J” and IR”S”,
political/medical/judicial arms
of the criminal enterprise
run by Obama-the-Undocumented.

[Lazamataz]

But there is one place where I part company with most forecasters. I’m not 100 percent confident that Republicans will gain seats. In fact, when I analyzed the Senate races in February, my simulation created a few scenarios where Republicans did, in fact, lose seats.

Scenario one: Massive voter fraud, in which Republican votes are 'lost' and Democrat votes pour in from double- and triple-voters, the dead, and are electronically created out of thin air.

Scenario two: Massive voter fraud, in which Republican votes are 'lost' and Democrat votes pour in from double- and triple-voters, the dead, and are electronically created out of thin air.

Scenario three: Massive voter fraud, in which Republican votes are 'lost' and Democrat votes pour in from double- and triple-voters, the dead, and are electronically created out of thin air.

Scenario four: Massive voter fraud, in which Republican votes are 'lost' and Democrat votes pour in from double- and triple-voters, the dead, and are electronically created out of thin air.

[Gay State Conservative]

I’m gonna be working for Scott Brown in New Hampshire this year *not* because he’s my dream candidate...or anywhere close to my dream candidate...but because he’s not even close to being the filthy,stinking,Maoist whore that Jean Shaheen is.

[Trapped Behind Enemy Lines]

Highly unlikely. Midterm elections are VERY different from presidential elections. The electorate in midterm elections is significantly smaller, older, and whiter than is generally the case in presidential elections, therefore significantly more conservative and more Republican and more motivated. Further, the Party in power tends to lose seats in midterm elections-—this is especially even more prounounced in the 6th year of a presidency. History clearly does not favor the Dems this November, although demographic changes continue to favor them in presidential elections.

[dforest]

They plan on cheating so they have to try to make it look close. Though anymore, they openly cheat and know nobody will do a thing about it.

That would be racist.

[longtermmemmory]

It is all about GOTV and locking up ALL absentee balloters.

(nursing homes, seniors, low information voters, etc)

[longtermmemmory]

the effete nyc dominant media is already reporting on the incredible wonderfulness of obamacare

[alloysteel]

Anything is possible, and the Establishment Republicans are famous for snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

After all, Harry S Truman “lost” the Presidential election in 1948. This was documented most famously in a headline in the Chicago Tribune.

The Establishment Republicans have a very strong potential ally in their bid to regain control of the Senate and making the Current Occupant of the Oval Orifice into the lamest duck in history. But it may involve sacrificing some of their closest “cronies” and respecting the wisdom of the adults in the room.

Seize them by the gonads, and their hearts and minds shall surely follow

[Mechanicos]

Unhindered Vote Fraud supported by both parties of the ruling class.

[pfflier]

The Republicans have managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in the past two elections. They didn’t help from anybody else.

[G Larry]

Never underestimate the ability of the GOP to steal defeat from the jaws of victory.

[itsahoot]

Here it comes, the setup for Dems to win.

Just their way of preparing us for the outcome they have planned through vote fraud.

[SoFloFreeper]

Massive voter fraud is being orchestrated. Dear Reader and the Chicago Thug Machine are cranking it up.

[Impy]

It’s unlikely they’ll retain control. It’s certain they’ll suffer a net loss. 3 seats are virtually certain to come to us (WV, SD, MT) and only 2 of ours are vulnerable (KY, GA).

Unlike 2012 most of our targets are GOP states and the only GOP seat in a rat state up is Maine which is safe RINO for Susie Collins. And just as importantly, this is a midterm of a President that’s not popular. Barry’s fan club showed up to reelect him but they skipped 2010. The majority of voters this election will have a negative opinion of Obama.

In addition to the 3 that I already mentioned we should take AR, AK, LA and NC. The rat is NOT favored in MI, slightly or otherwise, that’s a GOP edge. CO is a tossup at worse. IA, only a slight rat edge at worst. MN (Franken only narrowly leads nobody Republicans) and NH are lesser chances to keep an eye on. The party also has some hope in VA and OR but I don’t think those will be competitive. And Angus Baronet in Maine may flip his allegiance because all he cares about is his personal level of influence.

Whining about “rigged” elections is tiresome. How did they let us take the House and keep it if the outcome were “predetermined”? Fraudulent votes make up the margin of difference in a small number of very close races, they don’t turn GOP routs into the rats gaining seats. Fraud isn’t sorcery. The rats when they lost in 2002 and 2004 had a similar fantasy about “diebold election machines” being rigged. Excuses for losing are just that.

We lost in 2012 mostly due to shite candidates like WM Romney, Tommy “Grandpa” Thompson and Connie Mack the lesser. Any winnable race we don’t win this year will likewise be far more likely to be caused by our candidate being crummy than by fraud.

Fraud cost us only 1 Senate seat in 2012 (ND) and that was only possible because our guy did a horrible job. Libertarians cost us another (ME) and likewise our candidate wasn’t running a good campaign. Idiot candidates making short bus comments about rape cost us 2 more (MO, IN).

I didn’t think the rats could score a net gain of 2 in 2012 but THEY did and their polls that we dismissed unfortunately turned out to be accurate. They don’t think they’ll win this time.

This one writer writing this one SPECULATIVE article about how things could POSSIBLY turn around for the rats IF they get really lucky is not “the media” starting to “change the narrative” to fit a rat win. People who write regular columns need topics. You should see some stupid sports columns I’ve read, writer just had a deadline and needed to submit something.

History shows that for a President’s party to do well in a midterm, and by well I mean break even or gain slightly, he needs to be popular.

When Obama’s approval rating starts mirroring Bubba’s in 1998, then you can start talking seriously about slight rat gains being possible. And even if that occurs, is Obama gonna have positive approval in goddamn Arkansas or Alaska? Hell no. Obama getting more popular would hurt us in MI, CO and IA but the only way we don’t pick up those Senate seats in the so-called “red states” is if our candidates blow it.

[catfish1957]

If 90% of the senate GOP campaign ads highlight the Obamacare debacle, then they will take the senate. If they can be trapped into debating other issues, the results may not be as good.

RNC..... Here is your template...... (1)Start the ad with films of Obama's lies about keeping doctors, coverage, and lower cost. (2) Insert democrat candidate's face and any affiliation they have with Obama. (3) Watch dim poll numbers plummet

Easy