Posted on 04/29/2014 7:39:39 AM PDT by servo1969
That sounds like a threat by a Domestic Terrorist, doesn't it?
This woman should be fired immediately for that attitude.
The government agencies should NEVER ‘go after’ people who disagree with them.
They should simply make infomration public. People are then able to agree or disagree at their leisure, and vote accordingly.
You questioning her manhood ? /S
Head on a platter time.
> Its about challenging the credibility of world renowned
> scientists and institutions like Harvard University and the
> American Cancer Society, McCarthy said, according to
> Politico.
Argumentum ad baculum.
Not a fact or splinter of logic to be found anywhere in it.
Typical liberal approach. She can’t help it, she has been brainwashed since birth. Truth is not in her vocabulary.
Why does this administration have to many shriveled up old hags?
Congress has allowed this and from all the other agencies too. Her paycheck is not threatened at all and she knows it. They will continue to allow it. The bureaucrats have much more power than Congress.
Were coming after you ?
Aye...
I would hope that the Bundy incident woke the Patriots up. That is one of the reason that the Government surrogates , plants, and agents on this forum went after him tooth and nail. That was probably the silver lining to an otherwise black cloud. It separated the sheep from the goats.
Right in one.
'Tis what separates us from a Banana Republic.
The USA is looking more and more 3rd world, every day.
No, she has a bigger set of balls that the entire Republican Party. And neither do I question the manhood of the Republican Party. They have more than amply demonstrated time and time again that they have none.
Virtually every regulation proposed by the Obama administration has been justified by nontransparent data and unverifiable claims, said Smith, who cosponsored the bill. The American people foot the bill for EPAs costly regulations, and they have a right to see the underlying science. Costly environmental regulations should be based on publicly available data so that independent scientists can verify the EPAs claims.
And, right there is the crux of the issue, today. The crap regulations coming out of this criminal enterprise administration are based on whatever crap logic they choose to employ. If the science is sound, there should be NO EXCUSE for not releasing it. That would silence critics across the political spectrum.
My Spidey-Sense tells me there is no such defensible science to be found...
OK, had to check for “semi-satire”, because this is another case of a liberal/leftist actually telling the truth about their goals -
they are going to “go after”, ie, punish with government power,
those who disagree with them. This is what liberals want, deep down in the core of their ideology. It’s THE reason to obtain power.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.