Posted on 05/02/2014 3:24:30 AM PDT by PoloSec
MSNBC's Chris Matthews ranted on Thursday's Hardball that "it's a ridiculous" to hold the Obama administration culpable for the lack of security around the Benghazi compound during the September, 2012 attacks.
"But the idea that somebody else should have been covering for him [Ambassador Chris Stevens], that someone else should have the army there waiting to defend him, I think it's a little ridiculous," Matthews insisted. "How would the President even know he [Stevens] was going on that trip out there to Benghazi?
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
I think it is a little ridiculous that Chris Matthews has a paying job!
So tell me this Chris... Who is responsible for the diplomatic corps? The Executive branch, right? Who bears ultimate responsibility for his/her people? Here’s a hint - the guy/gal in charge. bammy would know this if he had any executive experience. You Chris, as a reporter, would certainly hold any executive/leader responsible for his/her people right? So stop giving bammy a pass just ‘cause you have a man crush (or more) on him.
Didn’t someone once say “The bucks stops here.”?I think you are referring to the putative president's desk, but the only "buck" that has ever stopped anywhere near aka obama's desk (on or under) would be Reggie "Drools" Love.
Oh that’s right, he’s black so he gets a pass. Isn’t Marxism wonerful?
Pray America wakes up
I thought he left journalism long ago and went to become a shill in some suck @$$ Liberal propaganda mill. Oh, wait. He did!
Except that for all intents and purposes, he is. That's the problem.
Let’s not forget the left claimed it was the photos of underwear on prisoners head that caused so much outrage of the muslims it led to the muslim uprising in Iraq.
Strange, sounds just like the video caused the attack in Benghazi.
Sure is strange how the video of Nick Berg, which symbolized the plight of the Iraqi prisoners, was made at least a week before CBS news came out with the prisoner abuse story.
Even stranger is CBS news held the story for a week, so the video was made to correspond with CBS news release of the story.
So just how did the terrorist know when CBS was supposed to come out with the story unless someone told them and coordinated it with the terrorist?
I’ve got an idea. Let’s have a look at the Senators that had the info about underwear on head photos.
Would Hillary be on that list?
I’m sure Hillary’s connection to the story of the underwear on head photos causing the terrorist uprising in Iraq and the video causing the terrorist attack in Benghazi is just a coincidence.
Hillary couldn’t possibly be collaborating with terrorist.
Note to Matthews:
Just what department of the US administration SHOULD be responsible for security at American locations outside the USA?
It is my understanding that the Ambassador begged for more security to the State Department for months. Did he contact the wrong department?
Please explain your answer in small words. I only went to a one room school.
Thanks PoloSec. Partisan Media Shill ping.
If it had been fairly widespread reported that orders came from the Whitehouse ordering the military to stand down, when the military indicated a rescue mission could have been launched and it was even desirable to do so, Bush.
Of course the sensible thing to Chrissy would be to blame Bush.
We’re making progress if Chris Tingle admits that there was a security problem in Benghazi.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.