Skip to comments.Benghazi Lies
Posted on 05/02/2014 3:54:11 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed last summer by Judicial Watch, the Obama administration last week released 41 documents related to the attacks on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012. An email from the deputy national security adviser, Ben Rhodes, has received most of the attention. In it, Rhodes laid out four goals for Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, who would be appearing on five Sunday talk shows 36 hours later. To convey that the United States is doing everything that we can to protect our people and facilities abroad; To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy; To show that we will be resolute in bringing people who harm Americans to justice, and standing steadfast through these protests; To reinforce the President and Administrations strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges.
The Judicial Watch documents also included White House talking points for Rice, with possible questions and answers she might provide to meet the goals set out by Rhodes. These new White House talking points included a broad discussion of the Arab Spring and its challenges, as well as several specific references to the attacks in Benghazia mention of Ambassador Chris Stevens, a question on Benghazi intelligence, and a separate section under the header Benghazi.
The Rhodes email and new talking points went to many top Obama administration communications and political officials, including press secretary Jay Carney, communications director Dan Pfeiffer, and Obamas 2008 campaign manager, David Plouffe.
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
I know this because people on FR are constantly telling me that what the US says about the Ukraine is the absolute truth.
‘resolute in bringing those people to justice’
They KNOW who is responsible and have done NOTHING!
Bob Beckle went psycho tonight and admitted there was a cover up but says he doesn’t care.
Muzzies jamming foreign object up the arse of American citizens and then killing them. Why should Obama have a problem with that?
The Obama regime is filled top to bottom with horses asses and traitors.
What difference, at this point, does it make?
Have not heard much from the Judicial Watch haters lately.
The Obama regime is filled top to bottom with horses asses and traitors.
It is also filled with arrogant, hubris filled morons who are so incompetent that they cannot even discipline themselves sufficiently to conduct a well managed stone wall and cover up on Executive branch malfeasance that could get them all impeached and potentially thrown in jail
“Bob Beckle went psycho tonight and admitted there was a cover up but says he doesnt care.”
That is the Hildabeast way...”What difference does it make?”
For today’s neo-Marxist anything is OK, as long as it does not get in the way of their plan for America.
It just shows what I’ve been saying about the democrat/marxist need to destroy morality. Democrat voters know that the democrats are lying to them but they no longer place any significance on right and wrong when winning is all that matters to them.
Care to elaborate? Maybe even give the names of those "people on FR"?
That’s the dirty little secret........when it’s THEIR GUYS, Dems don’t care at all what they do.......the end justifies the means.
This young thug in a suit is the consumate human illustration of the middle finger thrown up to our bloody, burned, dead ambassador, and the soldiers trying to save him, survive themselves and who were obliterated, and to everyone out here who gave a damn and still do.
I saw him live on Brett Bair’s show and was stunned. Scary arrogant.
If you didn't have an opinion already I bet you'd have never asked. But those who regurgitate Kiev PR releases and toss ad hominems at anyone who doesn't agree with them is a good indication of who they are.
Personally, I figure everything coming out of the country is about half spin so I read it all from both sides.
As for what should be done, well, No US troops, No US money, No US arms, and let the EU/Ukraine/Russia squabble over the pot as long as they like. The Ukraine was tight with Germany in WWII, let Germany send a few divisions to start killing Ukrainians and see if Russia openly intervenes. Better yet, let the Ukrainians keep on killing each other until they realize they have to either live together or admit they're not all like minded enough and have to split the country up.
Oh, and no, Russia shouldn't have seized the Crimea but I have to admit I don't see why a Soviet Primer giving it to Ukraine then their voting to be part of the Ukraine is much different than them voting to be part of Russia now.
Figures, couldn't name a one..........
Here's some advice, lap-tops and happy hour are obviously your worst friends.
Go home, go to bed and come back tomorrow morning after you've sobered up...you might have a different perspective on things.
People on FR are smart enough to read and figure out who fits the bill or they're not and they just want to argue.
The military expert and tactician, Whoraldo, was just on FOX news telling us that there was absolutely nothing the military could do to save our four Americans in Benghazi. If anyone should know it would be Hernando Revolver. He gets four Barry Noses from me. “Eyes On Target” by Scott McEwen and Richard Miniter tell a different story.
So, do they know enough to see the big picture? I dunno. I do know they know enough about what's going on a few miles from where they live to give a picture of it and it doesn't at all square with "gallant freedom fighters" winning the day. Nor does it match the claims separatists want to be part of Russia and have Russian support.
You wouldn't believe the rumors they get from their family there. A rumor spreads like wildfire today and is replaced with a new one the next. No one there seems to believe the news programs and no one believes the European, US, or Russian, media either so it's sort of a nut house if you ask me.
I don't buy it, there seems to have been a way to get some help to them, at least a cruise missiles or two if not much more. I'll find that book "Eyes on Target", I missed that one somehow.
You can still pick it up at Walmart. Great book.
Put yourself in the shoes of Hillary and Obama. You know that you’re smarter than everybody else in the world. You can do whatever you want to with Libya. You decide the cheap and slick way to get rid of Qadaffi is to provide support to Al Qaeda so they can kill him. You’re the smartest people in the world, remember? In a conversation at a D.C. Cocktail Party, a Republican staffer mentions that our President and Secretary of State providing support to the enemies of the United States who murdered four Americans including a US Ambassador could possibly be guilty of treason. Now, poor foreign policy and negligent security actions are grounds for serious consequences, but treason? Treason can get you executed. That’s why Beckel explodes. How do they explain away treason? “Yes, they committed treason, but they’re stupid and you can’t expect much from them.” This one scares the Democrats to death.
It’s amazing what inept, feckless morons the Obama regime has.
Hey, ya know? Just like their boss.
Thank you. My post was a general overview understatement of what I’m told. Your post is much more valuable and useful pin-point information. I’m interested. PM if there’s more that should not be posted. R2z