Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Terminal Vagueness of ‘Everytown’
nationalreview.com ^ | 5/2/2014 | Charles C. W. Cooke

Posted on 05/04/2014 6:49:13 AM PDT by rktman

Well, well, well — another one bites the dust. No sooner had Michael Bloomberg’s latest gun-control effort been launched upon an indifferent nation than the group’s head honcho had announced that he was stepping down. “It’s time for me to hand off the fight to somebody else,” Everytown for Gun Safety’s executive director, Mark Glaze, explained to Yahoo News yesterday afternoon. “It’s a tough issue and a tough grind . . . and there’s a point where you feel you’ve done all you can do.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; bloomberg; guncontrolnazis
We know what bloomies goal is. Nobody has guns except he and his ilk's bodyguards. Hey, nancy bloomers.......FAIL! Again. Wish I had money to toss away on useless causes.
1 posted on 05/04/2014 6:49:13 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman
Does Everytown support disarming The BLM, The USDA, The Socialist Security Administration, etc.?

Or just private citizens and soliders?

2 posted on 05/04/2014 6:53:33 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Quitter!


3 posted on 05/04/2014 7:01:40 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I guess Mark Glaze pissed somebody (Bloomberg) off, or there is a more sympathetic victim icon that can head this idiot moms in everytown gun grab thing. Maybe Gabby? She’ll say whatever you want (through her proxy).


4 posted on 05/04/2014 7:02:54 AM PDT by Gaffer (Comprehensive Immigration Reform is just another name for Comprehensive Capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

http://www.gaypolitics.com/2012/01/10/gay-man-heads-mayor-group-on-curbing-gun-crimes/


5 posted on 05/04/2014 7:03:40 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

*snort* He saw the huge and massive crowd of 25 show up in Indianapolis to counter the 800,000 people at NRA Convention.

Huge fail on the part of Doomberg.

“Everytown” Hahahahahahaha!


6 posted on 05/04/2014 7:05:44 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest

“800,000” at the NRA convention? LOL! You must have been using the million man march head count machine. Or some sneaky zero snuck in when you weren’t looking. :>}


7 posted on 05/04/2014 7:10:12 AM PDT by rktman (Ethnicity: Nascarian. Race: Daytonafivehundrian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dforest

I always hear the tune “It’s a Small World After All,” every time that stupid Everytown name comes up.


8 posted on 05/04/2014 7:14:53 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman
We know what bloomies goal is. Nobody has guns except he and his ilk's bodyguards. Hey, nancy bloomers.......FAIL! Again. Wish I had money to toss away on useless causes.

Fortunately, that pipe dream is confounded by the fact that the Constitution meant enough, for long enough, that the People do possess lots of weapons. I have a feeling that the Bundy deal will result in us seeing a tentative approach to forcible disarmament to test the depth of the waters of the People's resolve.

9 posted on 05/04/2014 7:25:49 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb

Well, there were those evil weapons of war, (”assault rifles”) visible in civilians hands. Why would any civilian have a need for those terrible weapons? Uh, cause the opposing forces have them? Just a SWAG.


10 posted on 05/04/2014 7:28:35 AM PDT by rktman (Ethnicity: Nascarian. Race: Daytonafivehundrian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Well, there were those evil weapons of war, (”assault rifles”) visible in civilians hands. Why would any civilian have a need for those terrible weapons? Uh, cause the opposing forces have them? Just a SWAG.

You may be on to something - if we give up our weapons, the government (opposing forces) will surely reciprocate. Don't know how we could have missed it - Kumbaya for all as soon as the People puts full trust and faith in our benevolent leaders rulers.

Wow, that was some dream I just had - must have been the hot sauce on my omelet this morning.

11 posted on 05/04/2014 7:50:32 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: trebb

Yup, skies filled with flying unicorns and skittle rainbows.


12 posted on 05/04/2014 7:57:07 AM PDT by rktman (Ethnicity: Nascarian. Race: Daytonafivehundrian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Yup, skies filled with flying unicorns and skittle rainbows.

And free Arizona Watermelon Tea on-tap at every corner.

13 posted on 05/04/2014 8:02:51 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: trebb

I thought about that after I wrote the other part. I was thinking more along the lines of streams filled with AIT.


14 posted on 05/04/2014 8:10:53 AM PDT by rktman (Ethnicity: Nascarian. Race: Daytonafivehundrian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Quit spoiling things;)


15 posted on 05/04/2014 8:19:15 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rktman
"....vocabulary has become king and euphemism indispensable. Gun “control” has thus become gun “safety”; restrictions on ownership have become “gun-violence prevention”....

That's how these people roll.

First it was: Abortion

Then: Reproductive Rights

Then: Women's Reproductive Health

Now: Women's Health

Who could be against women's health? /s

16 posted on 05/04/2014 8:31:33 AM PDT by SnuffaBolshevik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson