Posted on 05/07/2014 5:57:04 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The Daily Caller has the full text of his report, which is mercifully readable at 16 pages. The novelty isnt in the examples themselves, many of which will be familiar to you. The novelty is that hes trying to build a comprehensive case, listing dubious Hopenchange action in various arenas of policy. Os unilateral DREAM amnesty, his targeting of Anwar al-Awlaki without due process, various and sundry ObamaCare delays in defiance of the plain text of the statute theyre all in there. In fact, even at 76 items, the list isnt complete: For whatever reason, Cruz overlooks Obamas decision to attack Libya without obtaining congressional authorization first under the War Powers Act. Could be that Cruz himself questions the constitutionality of the WPA so he decided to let O slide on it. Why do you spose a potential future president wouldnt be too much of a stickler about Congresss power over war?
But I digress. The real question is why Cruz is interested in building a comprehensive case at all. Sure, its good politics, signaling to conservative voters that hes the constitutional candidate in 2016. (Sorry, Rand.) But maybe this is part of something bigger. Its beginning to feel a little bit impeach-y in here, isnt it?
Ever since the aftermath of the Benghazi attacks, Republicans and conservatives have compared the Obama administrations on-the-ground failure and intra-office spin job to Watergate. Politicos compare contemporary scandals to Watergate for one of two reasons: Laziness, or to gently raise the specter of impeachment
Thats why Boehners endorsement of the select committee on Benghazi was so significant. At one time, former Rep. Pete Hoekstra told Newsmax, Speaker Boehner said, if theres any indication that that this leads to the White House, you know were going to go after this. Boehner knew that Democrats would spend the next few months or years deriding a witch hunt, just as they mocked the Clinton impeachment.
And thats also why the backup from Fox News matters, and why more conservatives will join the discussion. Next month the attorney and National Review columnist Andrew McCarthy will publish Faithless Execution: Building the Political Case for Obamas Impeachment. There is a rich legal case, writes McCarthy, but impeachment is not about what the law allows. Impeachment is a matter of political will.
Most of the scandals cited by McCarthy faded under the klieg lights of big media, but he puts some of the blame for that on Republicans. He cites a 2013 event with Sen. Ted Cruz in which a constituent asked why Obama couldnt be impeached and the senator called it a good question. Impeachment, writes McCarthy is not a high mountain to climb, because Republicans will keep control of the House at least through Obamas presidency.
An impeachment push is potentially a no-lose situation for Cruz, not unlike the defund effort. The establishment already hates him; if he has a path to the nomination, its by consolidating conservatives, and being a loud voice on impeachment would help do that. Even if the effort fizzles in Congress, a la defund, hell have proved once again that hes willing to fight the fights his constituents believe in, even if theres little chance of winning. (Convicting Obama would require 67 votes in the Senate, which aint happening next year even under the rosiest of midterm scenarios.) Better yet, his rival for righty votes, Rand Paul, is more worried about shoring up his establishment credibility right now than impressing conservatives, so he probably wouldnt endorse impeachment full-throatedly. That would allow Cruz to heighten the contrast with him in the primaries.
Then again, maybe Cruz doesnt need to actually endorse impeachment to get the political benefits from doing so. Maybe he can go right up to the edge thats where todays report comes in by acting as a de facto lawyer for the prosecution but then, when asked point-blank what he thinks should happen to O, he could demur and humbly insist that its a question for the Speaker of the House. If Boehner refuses to consider impeachment, which is highly likely given what happened to Republicans the last time they went this route, Cruz can sigh wearily and say something vague about Congress needing bolder leadership. Hell have the gratitude of conservatives for having made the case, at length, of Obamas lawlessness, and hell have their sympathy for having been thwarted by the damned RINOs yet again. Itd be a clever play.
Here he is today before the Federalist Society indicting Os executive overreach for nearly a full hour. Theres more red meat here than there is in a stockyard. Dive in at any point.
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
That’s All!!!!
That’s just from today...
and no discussion of impeachment
how they expect anyone to follow ‘the law’ when they don’t, is beyond me
Go Cruz
impeach Obama
then run for President Cruz!
The criminal actions of CONgress, the White House and the courts over the years have been enough to collapse the republic, if it weren’t for honest, hard-working, moral Americans keeping it afloat.
Gotta start somewhere BUMP! HOORAY Ted!
Thanks for this.
Cruz reasoning is so lucid, and outlines grounds for impeachment based on law starkly, but so well as to not appear vindictive
“In 1998, Cruz served as private counsel for Congressman John Boehner during Boehner’s lawsuit against Congressman Jim McDermott for releasing a tape recording of a Boehner telephone conversation”
I have to give Boehner credit on this
Its not a racial thing, but he will never be impeached simply because of the racial thing.
Obama has a Blackmail Box thanks to the NSA. Wonder what sort of stuff is in that box.
Explains a lot. Either people like Boner are blackmailed or lazy or bribed.
It’d be a complete OJ moment, anyway, with the Senate voting to acquit.
Direct link to Ted Cruz’s website to download the complete list of 76 Lawless Obama Actions>
http://www.cruz.senate.gov/files/documents/The%20Legal%20Limit/The%20Legal%20Limit%20Report%204.pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.