Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Florida woman has her neighbors' mobile home DEMOLISHED
http://www.dailymail.co.uk ^ | may 9, 2014

Posted on 05/10/2014 9:58:50 AM PDT by lowbridge

A woman in Florida who didn't like her neighbors has been arrested for allegedly having their mobile home demolished.

Ana Maria Moreta Folch of St. Augustine told a heavy equipment operator that she owned the trailer and wanted it and its septic tank destroyed.

That wasn't the case, however, as the real owners arrived at the scene when the demolition was underway on Monday.

The St. Johns County Sheriff's arrest report says Moreta Folch wanted the trailer bulldozed because she thought its occupants were unsavory and she suspected they had broken into her car.

For the construction crew's part, she was able to convince them that it was her trailer because she had a key to the trailer.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: florida; mobilehome
Full title: Florida woman has her neighbors' mobile home DEMOLISHED because 'she thought they were unsavory and broke into her car'
1 posted on 05/10/2014 9:58:50 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Construction company is so sued.


2 posted on 05/10/2014 10:03:40 AM PDT by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Guy should have asked for a copy of the deed.


3 posted on 05/10/2014 10:10:45 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

They certainly share responsibility for not ensuring the woman owned the home, so they should be buying her a new one comparable to the one she owned.

If I were the company, that would be my straight-up offer.
Hopefully the terrible neighbour will do jail time over this.


4 posted on 05/10/2014 10:35:58 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
Construction company is so sued.

Straight-up vandalism, having done it without a demolition permit. County will not be pleased. A permit would have revealed the true owner. Construction company is so out of business?

5 posted on 05/10/2014 10:47:08 AM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

“They certainly share responsibility for not ensuring the woman owned the home, so they should be buying her a new one comparable to the one she owned.”

Oh, my mobile home before they demolished it? Well, you know elvis presleys home at graceland? My mobile home was an exact replica of that. Get to work.

Whats that you say? Theres no way my little mobile home was the size and shape of graceland? Well, good luck on proving that since you demolished the evidence.


6 posted on 05/10/2014 10:50:57 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
They certainly share responsibility for not ensuring the woman owned the home, so they should be buying her a new one comparable to the one she owned....

They should start with an offer to replace the mobile with a brand-new one, larger and nicer in every respect than the demolished one.

The real problem might be the septic tank. Depending on how local regulations have changed since the original was installed, a new one could be $25-50k all by itself. Or, it may not be possible to install a new one for any price.

The best of all outcomes would be that the contractor would hook her up to an existing sewer at no charge. If not, a new septic, meeting current regulations is in order.

The neighbor is in deeper legal doo-doo than the contractor. I would want this treated as a criminal act and try get her a year or two in the local lockup.

7 posted on 05/10/2014 10:57:08 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave

Might have been doing a public service.


8 posted on 05/10/2014 10:58:44 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Lesson for the neighbors. . . Don’t be unsavory and don’t Eff with the lady’s car.


9 posted on 05/10/2014 11:02:54 AM PDT by McBuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

The victim is SOOOO not guilty!!


10 posted on 05/10/2014 11:16:29 AM PDT by SgtHooper (This is my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roadcat
Straight-up vandalism, having done it without a demolition permit.

They probably didn't need a permit to demo a non-permanent "structure".

11 posted on 05/10/2014 11:25:55 AM PDT by Go Gordon (Barack McGreevey Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave

The moral thing and the smart thing to do would be to offer her an upgrade, but the legal thing to do would be to replace it with an equivalent.

Offering her something nicer than what she had could go a long way to offsetting the possibility of a lawsuit.


12 posted on 05/10/2014 11:28:54 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

why is a permit required for a trailer? it is registered as a vehicle.


13 posted on 05/10/2014 11:37:23 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

No it is not it has a homestead tax on it. Mobile ho
es are not ‘trailers’ like in the sixties. Mobile homes are are listed as improvements on property tax.


14 posted on 05/10/2014 12:12:57 PM PDT by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Maybe, maybe not. Depends on the state. Here double wides come with titles and are assessed as personal property. Modulars are assessed as real property.


15 posted on 05/10/2014 12:14:57 PM PDT by meatloaf (Impeach Obama. That's my New Year's resolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

This is why it’s not a good idea to live in something that has wheels.


16 posted on 05/10/2014 12:40:47 PM PDT by EricT. (Everything not forbidden is compulsory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson