Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Was there Work Place Sexual Harassment back in those days or did this start the ball rolling ?


4 posted on 05/10/2014 10:42:30 AM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: molson209

I remember sitting through those waste of time corporate classes on sexual harrassment given by feminazis while the news of Clinton and how N.O.W. supported him was playing every day.


9 posted on 05/10/2014 11:01:17 AM PDT by Baynative (How much longer will the media be able to prop up this administration?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: molson209; Baynative

Excerpt:

Ever wonder why Paula Jones’ lawyers were able to ask President Clinton about his sexual relations with other women? According to a new book [2000], Clinton himself is to blame.

In 1994 Clinton signed into law the Molinari amendments to the federal rules of evidence.

Named after Rep. Susan Molinari (R-N.Y.), the amendments permit the plaintiff in a sexual harassment suit to examine the defendant’s personal life in search of examples of similar behavior.

Under the prior, centuries-old common law, the defendant’s past behavior would have been deemed irrelevant. [snip]


25 posted on 05/10/2014 12:19:53 PM PDT by donna (Pray for revival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: molson209

Same policy as today. ‘Rat politicians were and still are exempt.

The main focus of the impeachment proceedings was Clinton’s perjury in his deposition in the Paula Jones sexual harassment suit. (The focus of the media coverage was obviously something else.)


26 posted on 05/10/2014 12:20:31 PM PDT by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson