Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From Target to Benghazi ^ | May 11, 2014 | Bruce Bialosky

Posted on 05/11/2014 11:03:39 AM PDT by Kaslin

Most everyone remembers that the biggest story of last year’s holiday season was not the hottest new toy or the stampeding crowds seeking post-Christmas sales. The biggest story was a computer breach at Target, one of America’s largest retailers that exposed the credit card information of millions of people to despicable hackers.

Gregg Steinhafel resigned as chairman and chief executive some five months after a massive breach. Though it appears he was forced out by his board of directors, it was nice to see someone man-up (if we can use that term in our new sissified America) for a debacle that he oversaw. Steinhafel is neither a computer expert nor is capable of stopping malicious hackers from attacks that happen every day on big businesses and our governmental agencies. But he was in charge and this brought dishonor to his operation. Detailed reports are thin of what actually happened to anyone whose information was exposed, but no one died. Yet it is on his head and he is out of a job.

The first time anyone stated they were taking responsibility for the situation in Benghazi was on October 18, 2012, in Lima, Peru. That is when Mrs. Clinton, then Secretary of State, told CBS news that she was taking responsibility for the death of the four Americans who were serving our country. Mrs. Clinton also stated “No one wants to get answers more than I do.” But what exactly did she do to get answers? If she did something it certainly would be news to me.

In fact, the first time I can trace that she took responsibility for the situation when on American soil was when she appeared in front of the Senate Committee. That hearing occurred on January 23, 2013 -- after the election and after she was out of office. The only citation previous to that was in a recent column by Sally Kohn of CNN who like the rest of the “progressive” press has castigated Republicans for witch hunting Benghazi. Kohn stated Clinton took responsibility four days after the attack, but no one else seems to have heard that one. The remainder of the Clinton’s statement at the hearing was platitudes and obfuscation. Then she made her famous stand whitewashing any attempt to find out about what happened when she stated “What difference at this point does it make.” So much for finding out what happened.

Now the Republicans in the House have appointed a select committee. And the mainstream press still does not want to know what happened. This is despite an email discovered by Judicial Watch which has clearly linked the Administration to the bastardized talking points used by them to attempt to define the aftermath of the killing of the four Americans. In a recent column by Dana Milbank, the Washington Post columnist who attempts to foist himself on America as a moderate, described the newly appointed chair of the select committee as the “showboating second-term Rep. Trey Gowdy, a Tea Party Republican from South Carolina.” The way the mainstream press brands them, soon one can expect interrogations to begin with “Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Tea Party?” Milbank might have also mentioned Gowdy was a federal prosecutor and was the district attorney for the Seventh Judicial Circuit of South Carolina. That may be why he was chosen – he actually knows how to investigate matters like these. Sounds kind of like a Senator from North Carolina who headed a prior investigation by the name of Sam Ervin.

We would still like to know what exactly happened prior to Sept. 11, 2012. The President gets intelligence briefings daily. Did someone say “You know these nut cases we are fighting like to ramp things up around particular noted dates? Maybe we should heighten our security around the world.” Did anyone do anything like that? Did our military increase security in coordination with the State Department? What the heck was our Ambassador doing in such an unsecured location on the anniversary of 9/11? And what exactly did the military and State Department do to protect our people in other countries that were in danger after what happened in Benghazi? There are many more questions which are all legitimate.

The question remains: who exactly screwed this up? Why did people from the Administration, the Defense Department and the State Department not get fired? The reason appears to be they were all too busy watching a video and arresting the poor schmuck who made it. They were all too busy making up bizarre statements to cover their derrieres. Gregg Steinhafel has paid the price; so far only four devoted Americans have and they are dead.

TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: benghazi; hillaryclinton

1 posted on 05/11/2014 11:03:39 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

2 posted on 05/11/2014 11:09:36 AM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Politicians ALWAYS say they assume complete responsibility for government foul ups, but that simply means they won’t lose their job and won’t do anything appreciable to fix the problem. Therefore, when Hillary says she assumes responsibility for Benghazi, she’s basically lying. She’s only saying that to appease voters, to make it seem like she actually gives a crap about those who were murdered and is sorry about her own mistakes. Forgive me if I’m not convinced about her sincerity.

Politicians want authority with no responsibility, and we voters, unfortunately, allow the politicians to get away with it far, far too often! The military taught me that responsibility always goes hand in hand with authority. If one is “in charge” then one must bear responsibility for the decisions they make. Again, that doesn’t appear to apply to our country’s illustrious political class.

3 posted on 05/11/2014 11:20:53 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (We can't have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Mr. president: we have received a phone call from Al Qaeda concerning Benghazi. They say they have the Ambassador, but he was mistakenly killed. They also say that they are prepared to wipe out our 30 plus people at the CIA site.”

“Well, Hillary, what do they want?”

“First, no rescue attempt. Second, we pull everybody out of Benghazi. Third, no retaliation strikes. Fourth, weapons, armored vehicles and night vision equipment. Fifth, $6,000,000,000 in cash. Sixth, you and I make a humiliating video apologizing to Moslems.”

“Valerie; what do you think?”

“Well, Barack, I think we should get something in return. First, we get the bodies and prisoners back. Second, the American press and people don’t hear about this. Third, no use of antiaircraft missiles.”

“Tell them that’s the deal, Hillary.”

“Yes, Mr. President.”


“Now what, Valerie?”

“Now we win the 2012 election.”

4 posted on 05/11/2014 11:26:35 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

I would not be surprised if this actually happened

5 posted on 05/11/2014 11:39:12 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson