Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD)
Reps. Adam Smith (D-WA)
Adam Schiff (D-CA)
Linda Sanchez (D-CA)
Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)
Posted on 05/21/2014 11:28:54 AM PDT by Kaslin
Earlier today, The Hill reported that Nancy Pelosi was ready to concede on the Benghazi select committee, and it didn’t take long for her to do so:
House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., names 5 Democrats to the Benghazi select committee – @KateNocera http://t.co/iyPLvA0Ncw
— Breaking News (@BreakingNews) May 21, 2014
The only surprise is that it took this long to decide. Pelosi had begun to lean in the direction of participating in the select committee on Benghazi, if for no other reason than to keep from getting left behind in the narrative. Instead of just appointing one troublemaker, though, she’ll fill all five slots:
The following Democratic Members will serve on the Select Committee on Benghazi:
Note that Alan Grayson is not among the group. There had been some suggestion to send only Grayson to provide a clown show to generate mocking press, but this looks a little more serious on Pelosi’s part. The appointment of Duckworth in particular is a deft touch, while Cummings has proven himself as a man who can reliably distract attention when needed.
The Hill’s Mike Lillis explained the thinking earlier:
But a senior Democratic aide said Wednesday that, while the decision is not final, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) “is now leaning toward appointing a full complement of Members to the Select Committee on Benghazi.”
Pelosi met with Democratic leaders Wednesday morning, and a second meeting is “likely” later in the day, to update lawmakers on the negotiations between Pelosi’s office and that of Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), the aide said.
Pelosi met briefly with Boehner to discuss the Benghazi panel on Tuesday afternoon, and staff was continuing the discussion Wednesday morning. …
“Talks between Pelosi and Boehner staff continue this morning on remaining items Democrats are asking for to ensure fairness, transparency and balance with respect to the committee’s proceedings and operations,” the Democratic aide said. “To reiterate, no decision has been made.”
The delay in the decision came from Pelosi’s desire to twist arms on committee rules for Democratic participation. That presumed that Republicans are desperate to have Democrats take part in the select committee for reasons of credibility and respectability. Supposedly, that would force Boehner and chair Trey Gowdy to allow the minority to have more control over the direction of the committee’s work, and to get equal power and authority — both of which Pelosi refused in her own 2007 select committee on global warming.
However, this strategy rested on a false premise. For Republicans, credibility won’t rest on the actual participation of Democrats as much as it does providing them with the standard access given to the minority side in any select-committee investigation. There’s nothing about the Benghazi probe that makes balanced participation more necessary than, say, the Senate’s select Watergate committee, which had a 4-3 split. Similarly, the select committees on Iran-Contra were split 6-5 in the Senate and 8-7 in the House, all favoring Democrats. All Republicans have to do is offer the opportunity to participate in order to maintain process credibility; they can’t be responsible if Democrats are too petulant to join.
Besides, the VA scandal and the parallels to White House inaction are rapidly eroding the outrageous-outrage claims of Democrats who argue that the Benghazi probe is just about politics. The more that Barack Obama’s statements and (in)action on the VA follow the same pattern as Benghazi, IRS, and other scandals, the more it looks like Democrats are the ones playing politics with the deaths of Americans. That, plus losing control of the narrative, make it far more incumbent on Pelosi to participate than for Boehner to bend over backwards to accommodate her demands.
90% of the committee’s work will be taking depositions, behind closed doors..The problem for Gowdy is that the Dems will leak everything, in an attempt to spin it, shape it..
Is their best friend's girl. Her name is rais. No real surprise. We dance, and she is my best friend's girl. I Love the lies when seeking the truth. Makes me know am over target and let's them say what they want ...
So, instead of one clown (Grayson), Pelosi is loading up the democRAT side by providing five clowns, with Cummings the lead BOZO!
As I noted on the other thread:
Cummings will try to make the whole thing a complete circus.
Duckworth is there so Dems can play the Victims Meme, so Dems Media allies can scream, “THOSE MEANY REPUBLICANS ATTACKED A HANDICAPPED VETEREAN!!!”
This is all designed to divert TV coverage away from the actual truth, to a “politics as Usual meme that can be ignored.
This is completely transparent...
Says it all.
We already know the “President” either chose to abandon the people while under fire or was derelict and failed his 3AM phone call. We also know that Clinton did nothing to secure the safety of the compound for months leading up to the attack. We also know that a political decision determined the choice of cover stories immediately thereafter and deflection of subsequent questioning throughout the following months with stonewalling stretching even longer (missing or redacted correspondence, unwilling testimony) suggesting a large scale coordinated coverup. There will have to be answers and there will have to be Justice.
Watch - for the Will of Heaven will come close to all of these people when they least expect it. Of that, I am sure.
Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD)Reps. Adam Smith (D-WA)
Adam Schiff (D-CA)
Linda Sanchez (D-CA)
Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)
Yep.
Except for the bald bag of hair Pelosi could have picked worse.
On the FOXNews.com front page - there was this comment by Ms. Pelosi:
“I could have argued this either way,” said Pelosi, a California Democrat. “But I do think it’s important to the American people.”
Pelosi also said she agreed to join the investigation to make it a “fair process” and to bring “openness and transparency” to the process.
To translate ....... Only when the dems join this committee, will it be FAIR; OPEN and TRANSPARENT. Which implies: the repubs are NOT FAIR, OPEN or TRANSPARENT.
Doncha just love how the dems always disparage the other guys (the repubs) by saying they (the dems) are something they (the dems) are not.
It’s just amazing.
NO WONDER I’M AT PUKE ALREADY WITH THESE PEOPLE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.