This should've already done it.
Posted on 05/25/2014 1:23:20 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Wouldn’t it be easier to just ban LIBERALS?
Crissy will be in a bind if he sighs such a law as it will end his presidential hopes.
The closer America gets to being a police state, the more desperate the Nazi gun grabbers are going to get.
Veto this monstrosity.
Repeal more gun laws.
Stop giving in to the left.
`gun control’=firearm confiscation
This should've already done it.
Hmmm... tell that to the Founding Fathers who's intent was to have an armed citizenry with the weapon of the time. The statement is like telling someone in 1716 that they were limited to 10 balls and patches and half a flask of powder...
Rifles are NOT legal for Hunting in the People’s Republic of N.J., N.J.is shotgun only for deer.Unless they changed the Law since I left.
The Marlin .22 Cal.Rifle has a tubular magazine,which lies under the bore tube.The magazine does NOT protrude downward from the rifle.
Just more legisislation to eliminate guns altogether.
N.J.,N.Y.,Chicago,New Orleans,L.A. one cannot carry a firearm for protection...where you REALLY need it...
Liberals have no common sense because it requires a calm and reasoned approach to use common sense. Liberals think with emotion and no reason.
Christy seeking the Nomination for President? Maybe not...
So you carry 3 ten round mags instead of 2 that hold fifteen each, still having 30 rounds available. Evidently the fascists that write this type of legislation aren’t smart enough to figure that out.
1990 “No law abiding citizen needs 30-round magazines,”
2000 “No law abiding citizen needs 20-round magazines,”
2010 “No law abiding citizen needs 15-round magazines,”
2013 “No law abiding citizen needs 10-round magazines,”
I’m beginning to see a pattern here!
Soon it will be that ““No law abiding citizen needs a 2-round magazine,”
What about high capacity BB guns?
You have to get a license to own a BB gun or a paint ball gun in NJ. It’s lost. Wall it off!
“N.J.,N.Y.,Chicago,New Orleans,L.A. one cannot carry a firearm for protection...where you REALLY need it...
Which is precisely WHY you need it.
Just sayin’
I don’t get how reducing the capacity from 15 to 10 makes a difference in reducing the impact of crimes committed while using a gun (their supposed rationale). One can do quite a bit of damage with 10 rounds. Thus there is no rational reason for it. It is clearly incrementalism. Another trajectory point along their path to zero.
No need. It’ll be on the other side after the national divorce.
IIRC, all Governor Crisco has to do is let the bill sit on his desk for ninety days then it becomes law w/o his signature so he can claim he never signed it.
New Jersey - where the state bird is the upraised middle finger.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.