Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul: It's a 'misnomer' to say McConnell isn't conservative
Channel3000.com ^ | May 23 2014 03:52:06 PM CDT | Ashley Killough

Posted on 05/25/2014 10:07:19 PM PDT by SoConPubbie

Rand Paul is defending his relationship with Mitch McConnell after helping his fellow Kentuckian defeat a tea party-backed challenger in a GOP Senate primary.

"I came out of the tea party movement. I'm very concerned about the debt. I'm very concerned about big government," Paul said on Friday. "But I think the misnomer is to think somehow Senator McConnell isn't. That's what his whole entire career has been predicated upon - fighting against big government."

The comments by Paul, the state's junior senator, came at a news conference with McConnell in Louisville that was focused on building party unity following a bruising campaign in which the minority leader's opponent, Matt Bevin, got 35 percent of the primary vote.

Some in the conservative grassroots movement immediately called for Republican voters to unite and support McConnell.

But Bevin has been noticeably quiet and hasn't said whether he'll back his rival--though he flatly stated on election night that he won't back the Democratic nominee.

That's not stopping Alison Lundergan Grimes, however. She's actively going after Bevin supporters. In an open letter Friday to the 40 percent of Republican voters who didn't vote for McConnell, she argued that a vote for Grimes is a vote for change.

"Yes, we are in different parties, and we have divergent views on some issues. But if you believe that we need a fresh face to shake up Washington, I invite you to join our campaign," the letter stated.

Bevin hit back later Friday with his own letter, saying she doesn't understand "the principles that united my campaign's supporters" and disparaged her stance on a number of items on her agenda.

He agreed with her that Kentucky needs change, but not her kind of change. He made no direct mention of McConnell in the letter.

(Excerpt) Read more at channel3000.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: 113th; getrand; gope; gottostoprand; knockhimout; knockhimoutnow; rand; randforgays; randisathreat; randpaul; thelongknivesareout; threat2bush; threat2cruz; threat2rubio; threattocruz; toopopular
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: Hambone02

No, the other option was to do what a conservative would do, and not endorse him, and surely not campaign for him.

Politicians do not have to endorse and campaign for candidates, they can just remain quiet.


41 posted on 05/26/2014 12:23:36 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

The Ruling Class of the GOP is FAR more harmful to the Conservative agenda and cause than Harry Reid could ever dream of being.

PRETENDING to be Conservative and then sabotaging the agenda itself as Minority leader and then PUBLICLY DECLARING WAR on Conservatives was far more destructive to our cause than by anything the Democrats themselves have ever done.

If you cannot understand that, then you are lost to hackdom and party loyalty over principles, which consigns Conservatism to irrelevance in the GOP.

Which is why many of us now vote 3rd Party or write in Conservatives instead of voting for a Republican.

McConnell wanted a war with Conservatives, well, he got one. It’s pure STUPIDITY to reward that abuse with a vote, REGARDLESS of the stooge in the wings for the seat.


42 posted on 05/26/2014 12:25:55 AM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Agree.


43 posted on 05/26/2014 12:28:49 AM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Lord, forgive us our sins and bring us to everlasting life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: onyx

How quickly the stench of DC infects anyone who works there.


44 posted on 05/26/2014 12:29:10 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Hitting the “like” button on this.


45 posted on 05/26/2014 12:30:13 AM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Lord, forgive us our sins and bring us to everlasting life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

So you whore our your vote for what you view is good for your pocket change?


46 posted on 05/26/2014 12:31:07 AM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Lord, forgive us our sins and bring us to everlasting life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: INVAR

You post truth... thank you.


47 posted on 05/26/2014 12:34:01 AM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Lord, forgive us our sins and bring us to everlasting life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

good night.


48 posted on 05/26/2014 12:49:11 AM PDT by entropy12 (Harry Reid will not allow debate on any good bills passed by House. GOP needs 51 senators in 2014!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Good night troll.

Getting on FR just to post anti-conservatism and refusing to engage with the conservatives here, is just trolling.


49 posted on 05/26/2014 12:55:25 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

It also reveals you are lying when you try to use fake pro-life passion as a cover for your aggressive anti conservative posting, and then grow silent when it is pointed out that your candidate is promoting a pro-abortion position.

CNN:
BLITZER: So, just to be precise, if you believe life begins at conception, which I suspect you do believe that, you would have no exceptions for rape, incest, the life of the mother, is that right?

PAUL: Well, I think that once again puts things in too small of a box. What I would say is that there are thousands of exceptions. You know, I’m a physician and every individual case is going to be different, and everything is going to be particular to that individual case and what’s going on with that mother and the medical circumstances of that mother.

I would say that after birth, you know, we’ve decided that when life begins, we have decided that we don’t have exceptions for one- day-old or six-month-olds. We don’t ask where they came from or how they came into being, but it is more complicated because the rest of it depends on the definition of when life comes in. So, I don’t think it’s a simple as checking box and saying exceptions or no exceptions.

And there are a lot of decisions that are made privately by families and their doctors that really won’t — the law won’t apply to, but I think it’s important that we not be flippant one way or the other and pigeon hole and say, oh, this person doesn’t believe in any sort of discussion between family. And so, I don’t know if there’s a simple way to put me in a category on any of that.

BLITZER: Well, it sounds like you believe in some exceptions.

PAUL: Well, there’s going to be, like I say, thousands of extraneous situations where the life of the mother is involved and other things that are involved.

So, I would say that each individual case would have to be addressed and even if there were eventually a change in the law, let’s say, the people came more to my way of thinking, it’s still be a lot of complicated things that the law may not ultimately be able to address in the early stages of pregnancy that would have to be part of what occurs between the physician and the woman and the family.

This goes for the same with the end of life.


50 posted on 05/26/2014 1:00:11 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I really hate when Libertarians lie and treat Republican voters like children to be manipulated.


51 posted on 05/26/2014 2:25:45 AM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
Actually McConnell is very harmful to conservatives, because as leader of the Republican caucus he controls what Republicans pursue and what they don't. He has a history of protecting the Democrat agenda in the Senate, and preventing the republicans being an effective opposition to the Democrats. He is very helpful to the Democrats by sidelining and obstructing conservatives in the republican caucus.

You work very hard to promote the liberals.

52 posted on 05/26/2014 2:39:01 AM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

McConnell and Boner FINANCED Obama all these years.. ON PURPOSE...
They could easily have cut him off at the knees..
BUT DIDN’T...

ALL funding originates in the House the Senate merely signs off on it..
The federal givernment IS NOT “THE givernment”
It’s one of three givernments.. if the fed languishes no big deal..
The States do most of the work..

Federal, State and Local..
The republican Congress is for democracy NOT FOR the Republic..
The democrats are too...... that’s WHY? they are called democrats..

Seems most republicans are indeed DEMOCRATS.. and not republicans at all..

Next time the USA is referred to as a democracy.. THEY ARE LIEING.. right to your face..
-or- total civic morons..


53 posted on 05/26/2014 3:01:43 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Rand is making me very nervous


54 posted on 05/26/2014 3:30:22 AM PDT by ebmiller (Podcasts are the way to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Kentucky - 2014 Primary Election

Total votes | U.S. Senate

Republicans  355,132

Democrats    402,421
~~~~~
McConnell   213,741        

Grimes      307,748


I heard on the radio that we are going to have a "wave election"
this fall for the Republicans, but these numbers suggest to me
that the only wave on election night will be McConnell waving goodbye.

Goodbye Mr. Turtle!!!

55 posted on 05/26/2014 3:45:53 AM PDT by greedo (-- {Elite Killer Special Forces 2014} http://youtu.be/Gmjr079QDtk --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: INVAR

McConnell is a machine politician incumbent with total control of the GOP at the state level.
__________________________________________________
McConnell mirrors Reid and his Democrat Nevada machine in this regard. Both are as corrupt as it gets.


56 posted on 05/26/2014 4:30:15 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Somebody else who doesn’t know what the word “misnomer” means ...


57 posted on 05/26/2014 5:13:59 AM PDT by hemogoblin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Well do you really want a hard left Dem to get McConnell’s senate seat? Honestly I have little faith left that the ballot box will fix America but I’m not rooting for the Dems. Neither is Rand Paul.

Rush Limbaugh was correct when he said “if you have a “D” after your name you are the enemy”


58 posted on 05/26/2014 7:06:21 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
Rush Limbaugh was correct when he said “if you have a “D” after your name you are the enemy”

He was half correct.

If you are GOP-Establishment, you are also the enemy.

Or do our principles mean nothing?!
59 posted on 05/26/2014 9:52:24 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
Well do you really want a hard left Dem to get McConnell’s senate seat?

In the words of Hitlery Clinton: "What difference does it make?"

What difference does it make between someone who is openly hard-left, and someone who PRETENDS to be a Conservative Opposition leader but yet enables the hard-Left to implement their entire agenda AND THEN DECLARES WAR on Conservatives??

I will tell you what is different, TREASON to the cause and the base. I'd rather have the enemy in front of me than the traitor who assists the enemy from within our own ranks… hell, LEADING our ranks.

McConnell DECLARED WAR on Conservatives, vowed to CRUSH US - and yet we have the Establishment lackeys trying to lecture us about how it is better to have someone waging war on you to be in his seat than the Leftist???

What difference does it make? I'm flabbergasted at the acute cases of Battered Wife Syndrome on display here.

Honestly I have little faith left that the ballot box will fix America but I’m not rooting for the Dems.

The ballot box CANNOT fix America. We went Soviet. The entire process is corrupted. History and heritage teach the lesson with utter clarity about the only way such tyranny is uprooted. But too many have a fatal case of Normalcy Bias, so tyranny is our future lot.

Rush Limbaugh was correct when he said “if you have a “D” after your name you are the enemy”

Anyone in the Washington leadership with an "R" after their name is as much an enemy and traitor to our cause as the MarxoFascists are to the Constitution.

60 posted on 05/26/2014 9:52:36 AM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson