GABBY GIFFORDS: CONGRESS MUST PASS GUN CONTROL TO PROTECT WOMEN POST-SANTA BARBARA

Breitbart.com ^ | May 28, 2014 | Awr Hawkins

[SgtHooper]

But yet she is one of the “smartest” pollies in the Rat party! Go figger.

[fieldmarshaldj]

Their fascist agenda IS a threat to our society.

[AppyPappy]

Why doesn’t California pass strict gun control...oh wait, they did.

[DPMD]

Maybe Mark Kelly can set the example by giving up all - all - of his firearms, and Gabby all - all - of her armed guards.

[eyedigress]

Alright, immediate action. If you conspire to ignore the Constitution of the United States and actively pursue to circumvent the law thereof, you are subject to a loss of all assets and imprisonment for life.

That should be the swearing in of any duly elected officer in our government.

[eyedigress]

Kids today don’t even know who Giffords is. Might as well bring up Kunstler and black rage.

[Impy]

She should call for the dangerously mentally ill to be locked up, rather than call for gun control.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Nanny State PING!

[Smokin' Joe]

She’s dain brammaged. Apparently logic centers are affected. Pity all those laws against shooting people, stabbing people, or running them down with an automobile just aren’t enough. (As if a nutcase gives a diddley squat what the law is, anyway, and as if one more is going to make any difference.)

[Lazamataz]

Gabby, we need more gun control like we need a hole in the head.

....oh, wait.....

[Lazamataz]

Didn’t this loon stab 3 people to death? What next, they will call for gun control when people get killed by cars? What the f is the connection?

This is the old *uck Schumer move.

Immediately after a high-profile knife attack in New York City , *uck Schumer immediately took to the airwaves calling for......

......stringent new gun controls.

Of course it makes no sense. Not the point. It's all about screwing over the American people any way they can.

[MrB]

The point/connection is that knives are not an effective means of resisting leftist tyranny, but guns are,

and any prominent violent incident can be used by the left to advance their power agenda.

[Smokin' Joe]

I thought “gabby” was brain damaged...and not “gabby” much anymore. Also, there are numerous pictures of her shooting rifles. Could it be that her sleazy husband is merely using her to shill his anti-gun career? What losers.

There is a precedent. Jim Brady was a gun collector before Hinkley shot him at the same time he shot Reagan and a Capitol Hill Policeman. After that Sarah saw a meal ticket and started using him as a poster child for gun control.

Now, there is an heir apparent to the poster child status, and one who is cuter than an aging fellow.

It's a shame she got shot, that the maniac who went on a rampage that day shot anyone, for that matter, and wasn't interdicted by family, among others.

It is what it is, and one more law won't stop the next clever nutcase from shooting up a crowd--or a specific target--but someone with their sidearm might.

[1Old Pro]

Probably true, knives don’t pose a threat to a Leftist regime.

[Lazamataz]

The point/connection is that knives are not an effective means of resisting leftist tyranny, but guns are,

Yes, and *uck Schumer has gone on to embrace every legislative attempt to impose tyranny, even going as far as to urge Obama to issue Executive Orders in areas where Congress has the only authority.

So now it kinda falls into place a little.

[Smokin' Joe]

They don't need a connection. When the OK City bombing happened, it stopped a repeal of the assault weapons ban cold. The only firearm involved was never discharged, McVeigh had it loaded and on the seat when pulled over in an automobile with no license plates (If ever a fleeing perp might get away with shooting the policeman, such was a time, not that I'd encourage such behaviour).

Did the cry go out for bomb control? Rental truck control? Fertilizer/fuel oil control?

Nope, it was the gun owners who took the hit.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!