Posted on 05/29/2014 7:20:05 PM PDT by kingattax
Nevada, California, Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico were all formed out of land ceded by the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo.
Plus Marin County.
West Marin is quite loopy, but San Rafael and Corte Madera are not bad to do business in.
yes, but not in question. The poster stated that Nevada was carved out of the STATE of Utah. It was not.
There was a Utah Directorate that was not a State, that covered much of what became Nevada.
Funny you should mention 6 mores states to make Obama’s 57
BECAUSE currently a petition in Calif circulating right now is to divide the state into 6 states (not 2). The petitions need to be turned in by July 18 2014 to be on the Nov. ballot. Something like 850,000 signatures are needed.
They were the territory of Mexico.
The land was all Grants to military heroes, except for the steep terrain that nobody wanted.
Yes, Massachusetts used to be part of Maine, but it wasn’t working out.
I like “LAFS” better.
TV News Example: “ And now, to our reporter in LAFS. “
Utah became a territory which included Nevada. In 1861 Nevada became a separate Territory. Nevada became a state before Utah,.
Therefore Nevada was not made a state out of the state of Utah.
All I’m saying.
So far the example I have is WV.
Fine. Kick CA out of the Union.
I would love to include Trinity County in that effort; but I don’t think the south will ever let us go, we have the water.
Roger that. If we could just get SF and LA to drop into the ocean, we might have a pretty good state again.
I used to work in San Rafael, or maybe it was Larkspur. I could never figure it our for sure (San Quentin)
California should be broken up into about 10 States.
Sorry Land of Fruit & Nuts residents...Texas is the only state that can legally secede ....and sometimes I wish we would.
Hubris and I don’t see any reflection of your claim contained herein...
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/texan02.asp
(Read your bio. I do appreciate your service to our country, though.)
Hubris? Moi?? Nah. See my bio. LOL
(Reference: the Texas-American Annexation Treaty of 1848)
The formal controversy about the legality of the annexation of Texas stems from the fact that Congress approved the annexation of Texas as a territory with a simple majority vote approval instead of annexing the land by Treaty, as was done with Native American lands
http://history.state.gov/milestones/1830-1860/texas-annexation
If you seek respect, offer it first, something you didn’t do, thus the “hubris” by claiming to be “special” while at the same time mocking CA residents...whether by choice or not.
The issue of secession is one that is subject to great debate, however, the actual resolution, as granted by the Congress of Texas, stipulates about all I need to know...they don’t mention the right to secede when they decide they want to. They do mention division of Texas into separate states, but not secession...
A state history page notwithstanding...”sweetie”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.