Just remember that there were assessments BEFORE these TERRORISTS were sent to Gitmo in the first place and only the worst and most dangerous of all were sent there and now Obama is letting them go...
To: Innovative
Now that Obama has set the precedent that he can ignore the law and release mass murdering terrorists with impunity, he has more flexibility to free the rest of his heroes.
2 posted on
06/06/2014 6:11:58 AM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Innovative
Now that we’ve traded five of the worst of the worst for one of the worst of the worst, letting everyone else go free is just icing on the cake.
Let them loose in Chicago. No one will notice.
3 posted on
06/06/2014 6:12:35 AM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
To: Innovative
LOL! No other country wants to take these losers
Because they are murdering or wannabe murdering psychos.
well played obama.
searching for another govt whose principles can be rented with US taxpayer dollars. Like Qatar
Like my plumber once said, if money can solve it, it ain’t a problem
4 posted on
06/06/2014 6:13:39 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
To: Innovative
So when these guys start killing Americans, will it still be Bush's fault?
6 posted on
06/06/2014 6:26:56 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: Innovative
Congress seems complicit in this by doing nothing.
..Which is their usual schtick.
7 posted on
06/06/2014 6:30:48 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: Innovative
Yeah but when they kill again it will be all THIS guys fault because he read a book to school kids.....
To: Innovative
18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them OR ADHERES TO THEIR ENEMIES, GIVING THEM AID AND COMFORT within the United States or elsewhere, IS GUILTY OF TREASON and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
To: Innovative
Then let’s have them reside in the wh with their most beneficent benefactor.
13 posted on
06/06/2014 6:53:18 AM PDT by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: Innovative
To: Innovative
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
US Constitution, Article 3, Section 3
16 posted on
06/06/2014 8:07:48 AM PDT by
Tzimisce
To: Innovative
18 posted on
06/06/2014 9:21:54 AM PDT by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: Innovative
This is how he’s going to close Gitmo. We wouldn’t let him close it, but we’ll apparently let him clear it - at which point it’ll be easy to close.
20 posted on
06/06/2014 9:30:46 AM PDT by
TheZMan
(Buy more ammo.)
To: Innovative
Wouldn’t it be quite a bit simpler, and just as legal, not to mention way cheaper, to just EXECUTE the Gitmo prisoners?
To: Innovative
Remember that song, “Russians,” by Sting? Do the Democrats love their children, too? Are they so aligned with this guy that they even go along with setting the worst of the worst free? It seems like there’s no extreme he can go to that they won’t follow. Even things no one ever imagined, it’s “Well, if Barry’s for it, okay by me!” They used to want them released to detention in the US, which was stupid enough.
Geraldo was on TV saying, “They were going to be released at some point anyway! Do you think we should keep them for life?” I’d be all for executing them, but barring that, for life in Cuba sounds okay by me.
24 posted on
06/09/2014 12:17:15 AM PDT by
Rastus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson