Skip to comments.Obama Says He Wants To “Go Off” On Climate Deniers
Posted on 06/08/2014 10:33:57 PM PDT by Nachum
It would seem President Obama is losing patience with those who excercise their free speech rights to express concerns about his (bogus) Climate Change agenda. As a matter of fact, according to an interview published in The New York Times, President Obama would love to Go Off on Climate Deniers in Congress:
Do you ever want to just go off on the climate deniers in Congress?
Yeah, absolutely, the president said with a laugh. Look, its frustrating when the science is in front of us.
We can argue about how. But lets not argue about whats going on. The science is compelling.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Barry is nuts. He’s on an “openly gay” power trip right now.
Well, fortunately for us, he’s “constrained” by the Constitution! /s;)
If it wasn’t for glob warming, Chicago would still be under a mile of ice.
what “science” is that pray tell obama
The “science” in front of us...
More like the political and financial calculus in front of him!
Yes, “the science is in front of us” and it’s not saying what this and other liberals want it to say. So “go off” all you want, Mr. Obama, because you will be deluged with facts as with all your other scandals.
Why doesn’t he just “go off on” a unicorn, a tortoise, [anything]?
Simply put: Barky thinks there's climate change occurring because he's smoked too many poles.
I wish your _resident would just ‘go off’... perhaps ‘go off’ to Mecca, or Indonesia, or any place but North America or Europe. Perhaps Bikini Atoll or as the Australians say, go on a ‘walkabout’, perhaps across the Pacific, without a boat, merely buoying himself up with his mere presence!
Like Howard Hughes watching the movie ‘Ice Station Zebra’ over-and-over, Barry sits in front of a big screen TV, feet in empty Kleenex boxes, saving his urine in jars, chomping Nicorette gum and watching ‘ The Day After Tomorrow’ over-and-over.
See, in that movie the guy who played the VP and stubbornly resisted the opinions of gay scientists that ‘climate change’ (then ‘global warming’) was real was also a dead ringer for Dick Cheney.
Anyway, one of the scientists, one of the Quaid boys—not ‘Cousin Eddie’!—was, passionately convinced that the science was there, and his son, the guy with the last name no one can spell ... he was really smart too and convinced when it actually happened, and they were both really cute, so there it is.
He’s going to flounce around and smack people with his purse.
You mean, like ejaculate?
He needs to inspire Congress to petition the states for an amendment to the Constitution which will delegate to the feds the specific power to address environmental issues, such as PC climate change, just as he should have done with constitutionally indefensible Obamacare. And if the states choose to ratify Obama's amendment then the feds will be able to throw taxpayer dollars at climate change issues and Obama will be a hero.
Science? Asshat, you couldn’t grasp the science if you had a platoon of tutors helping you along for a year.
I take Viagra, and now my penis is this big!!!
All you have here is a bunch of assumptions masquerading as facts. Change the assumptions and you change the outcome.
Right back at ya, slick.
This encapsulates Obama’s world view, and tells a lot about how it was shaped. The reality is that Obama thinks that there is a ‘superior’ opinion about everything - the ‘superior opinion’ of those in the ‘intelligentsia’, of which he clearly counts himself as a member. It is a self-delusional world view that is the byproduct of giving way too much credit societally to the credibility of the university ivory tower.
The reality is that Obama has no background in climate science, and thus when he says the ‘science is compelling’, he is uttering an opinion no more valid than that of anyone else who reads about and forms an opinion on the issue of anthropomorphic climate change. That doesn't stop him from speaking authoritatively about it, however.
It was put so well by Reagan: “It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.”
“All you have here is a bunch of assumptions masquerading as facts. Change the assumptions and you change the outcome.”
Exactly what I was getting at, but you put it much better and more succinctly.
Actually, he didn’t offer it on his own.
His Public Relations office, the media, set him up by framing the question that way.
Makes it so much easier for his Royal Anus when the sycophants in the press are bowing and scraping for him.
Climate change - the new secular religion, alongside atheism, the older secular religion, and liberalism, the traditional secular religion.
All three are dogmatic & intolerant of dissent. Those who oppose any one of them must be condemned.
We have as President one who is of high priestly rank in each of them, who proclaims, “Crush those who dare go astray!”
The lying, murdering, traitorous pResident.
Ant Republican or Tea Party remark of this sort would earn accusations of threatened violence and a visit from the Secret Service,
There is so much wrong with this statement that I was inclined to simply write off Obama as too ignorant to comment on. However, since he's "going off" on me, I'll comment on him.
"Climate Change" is a political term. There is no science involved with it. It was generated by the warmists when the earth stopped warming more than a decade ago. It allows them to continue their fear mongering without debating its accuracy.
Grouping "climate change" with science is simply a political sleigh of hand to further the deceit. This means that Obama is either stupid, or he thinks that all of the rest of us are. I vote for both. He is not only too stupid (not ignorant, STUPID) to realize this, he is also too stupid to realize that the vast majority of people also can see his stupidity. It is only an affirmative action media that allows the perpetuation of this lie.
Seems to have gummed up his thinking...
Why don’t you explain to us why you are right instead of “going off”? Use some of the science knowledge/
Unless, of course, you don’t have the evidence on your side.
I agree with the other posters, he is all in on his homosexuality..
Can you say “SMOKESCREEN DISTRACTION?”
ZeroØ wants to get off on climate deniers. Huh, what?
Ewww. Creepy little s#!t isn’t he?