[2012 in Denmark] Churches Ordered to Perform Sodomy-Based Wedding Ceremonies

article from Telegraph June 7, 2012 and BarbWire ^ | Bryan Fischer

[TBP]

Follow your conscience.

[Know et al]

churches should not be allowed to break “laws” that everyone else has to obey.///

Shouldn't that apply to congress as well? (Obamacare exemption)

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

I’ve got a question.

If a man and woman get married, but do not consummate the marriage, they can get an annulment.

If two sodomites get “married” how do they go about getting a “divorce or annulment? How do they “Prove” it?

We know marriage is between a man and a woman. Sodomite marriage is nothing but an illusion.

[G Larry]

It would result in revolution.

[OneWingedShark]

I’ve been saying for a long time that churches will be forced to allow gay marriages. I blame the preachers. They should have been standing up to the government for a long time instead of worrying about their tax exempt status. Now it’s too late to stand up.

Is it?

(2 Chronicles 7:14)
if my people who are called by my name humble themselves, and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and heal their land.

[OneWingedShark]

The Church is under no obligation to take on the values of the State, and the State can not demand that they do, because that WOULD be a direct violation of the Establishment clause.

Ah, but here's the kicker: it won't be congress doing it, but the Burearchy.

You see literal words and "the spirit" matter only when they line up with the Agenda.