Posted on 06/16/2014 6:16:21 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom
Suspected Islamist insurgents in Kenya have raided a police station and set on fire at least three hotels and a petrol station, reportedly killing at least 50 people. [...]
Witnesses said the gunmen targeted non-Muslims and those who did not speak Somali. [...]
"They were shouting in Somali and shouting 'Allahu Akbar' (God is Greatest)." [...]
(Excerpt) Read more at news.sky.com ...
If obama had a son....
“Unexpected” by the U.S. “Government”.
Is Obama a Sunni or Shiite?
Shiite minus two letters.
The world is learning that Islamic culture is not compatible with modernity. Western leaders must come to the realization that the institutions and values that emanated from the European enlightenment are alien to Islam. They are not “just like us”. Only them will policies become more rational and effective.
Obama doesn’t believe in any god.
Israeli ambassador to UN: Iran is the world’s primary sponsor of terrorism By MAYA SHWAYDER
06/15/2014 11:29
It’s odd how all the facts behind the terrorists, and their drug distribution business, doesn’t seem to make news. These “terrorists” wouldn’t function for very long without government complicity. The same applies for all cartels.
Supposedly around 11% of Kenyans are muslim.
A little less than 75% of them are Sunni.
Less than 10% are Shia.
Madness, madness, and more madness.
Except himself.
Well, this is clear evidence, as we all know, that this is another unfortunate incidence of "workplace violence".
ISIS/ISIL stands for Emperor Zero and the House of Sauds Al Qeada Army.
http://nyyrc.com/blog/2014/05/the-nigerian-connection-boko-haram-obama-and-qatar/
“Instead, ignoring what Boko Haram pronounces its goals to be, the Obama administration portrayed it as a diffuse organization with no clear agenda that was ascendant due to the policies of the Nigerian government (which is under Christian leadership). As the Boko Haram threat got progressively worse, the State Department and the White House theorized that it could be defused by better government engagement with the Muslim population in Northern Nigeria, and that designating Boko Haram as a terrorist organization—which would have triggered our law’s array of counterterrorism tools and squeezed the organization financially—would raise its prestige while encouraging more government repression against Muslims.”
It’s hard to fathom how the State Department could fail to see the hallmarks of al Qaeda in Boko Haram, whose very name means “western education is forbidden [according to Islam].” If there is still any doubt, Boko Haram made it clear when they hoisted the al Qaeda flag over the kidnapped children. Perhaps this stance by Hillary should not perplex us. It was Hillary, after all, who insisted that the United States had a right to arm the Libyan rebels in overthrowing Gaddafi, despite the fact that many of them were essentially al Qaeda. Since then, Libya has failed to stabilize, while becoming a hotbed for drug trafficking Islamic cartels. (Drug trafficking is another signature of Islamist movements, especially al Qaeda. This theme will be expanded on and explained below.)
And yet Hillary’s State Department’s obliviousness was not an oversight – it appears to be State Department policy. For in May 2013, the Nigerian government conducted air strikes against Boko Haram positions in northeastern Nigeria. Secretary of State John Kerry, at once, urged restraint, cautioning the Nigerian government of Goodluck Jonathan “to respect human rights and not harm civilians.” Let us recall the number of civilians that Obama has effectively ordered killed each year by U.S. drone strikes in the alleged hunt for al Qaeda terrorists (who seem to be more menacing than ever): 2,400 have been killed in drone strikes from 2009 through the end of 2013, many of them civilians. With hypocritical allies like Clinton, Kerry, and their boss, Obama… good luck, Jonathan. You definitely need it.
The Libyan Arms Grab
What could explain the sudden prominence and threat of Boko Haram, which was, up until 2011, not viewed as an existential threat to Nigerian society? There rise seems to coincide with the fall of Gaddafi and the dispersing of his massive weapons caches. Note that in Iraq, when Saddam Hussein was defeated, it was the very Iraqi weapons which were formerly under state control that fueled the al Qaeda insurgency of the Islamic State of Iraq, or ISI (no pun intended on the part of the author). Several sources, including Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, suggest the the Obama administration, specifically the CIA acting under the aegis of the Hillary’s State Department, was using the compound in Benghazi as an arms shipment point to rebels (i.e., al Qaeda et al.) in Syria. Would it not make perfect sense that the some of the weapons went south, into Nigeria? And into the Central African Republic, which has also seen a horrific spike in violence since 2011?
What is the Obama administration doing in Africa? It is a question worth considering. Additional food for thought comes from Mali. In 2012, the United States, along with the United Kingdom and France, sanctioned the government of Mali following a military coup. The coup in Mali was a direct result of the previous government’s impotence in effectively thwarting Islamist insurgencies in the north, such as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). Why would the United States and other NATO allies sanction a government that was fighting al Qaeda from overtaking their country?
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s dictum applies: “Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.” Is Obama really arming and supporting al Qaeda?
The remainder of the article will explore this proposition and offer evidence of why this conclusion looks likely.
Tha gangster cult called Islam strikes again and we still allow these fiends to immigrate here.
Agreed.
Follow the money.
The Obama administration is doing in Africa exactly what it has done all over the world. Picking a local drug cartel, aligning with it, supporting it while firing drones and/or attacking its rivals. Therefore, some Al Qaeda get the stick and some Al Qaeda get the carrot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.