[Oldeconomybuyer]

Public sector unions are a massive indirect transfer of taxpayer funds to the democrat party. I expect SCOTUS to rule in their favor not on constitutional grounds, but because today's activist court supports the practice and the party. Roberts will once again be on the wrong side of the decision.

I hope I'm wrong.

[Perdogg]

I believe the Conservative caucus on the court will go 2-0 tomorrow.

[jmaroneps37]

Yes pictures of Roberts’ children’s fake adoption papers have been slipped under his door. He’ll vote with unions.

[Gunpowder green]

How can somebody be employed taking care of their own child in their own home? And how can a union collect dues for that?

[rainee]

I’ve read that Scalia is the wild card..guess based on questions he was asking during oral arguments. Hoping they get this one right, public sector unions should be banned.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

This would really put a crimp in Ubama's plan to unionize 21 million Ubamacare workers/Democrat voters.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/19/book-obamacare-law-designed-to-unionize-21-million-health-care-workers/

[dennisw]

You will be wrong. The SC is going to flush the pub sector unions on this power and money grab

[boycott]

Public sector unions are a massive indirect transfer of taxpayer funds to the democrat party. I expect SCOTUS to rule in their favor not on constitutional grounds, but because today’s activist court supports the practice and the party. Roberts will once again be on the wrong side of the decision.

I hope I’m wrong.

---

I agree with every word. The Constitution is worthless paper to the political activists on the court.

[Don Corleone]

It used to be that unions could only deduct, without permission, an amount to cover costs of negotiations but not their other expenses, such as political, organizing etc. What happened to that ?

[CharlesWayneCT]

There should be no such thing as a public employee union.

Unions exist in order to provide an organization that can compete in size with the private companies that want to hire workers, so as to give workers some power to dictate better terms.

The union gets power from the government, since it is the government that enforces the rights of the unions.

So, the government is seen as the benevolent protector of the workers. Therefore, people working for the government are working for their own protector, and don’t need a union. If they don’t like how they are treated, they can also use the political process.

It would be like people working for a union wanting to unionize to protect themselves from the union.

[Jim Robinson]

Prayers up!

[wetgundog]

Harris v. Quinn case ...
also nicknamed the Jenny Grandmole law named after a Canadian cur bitch who was elected in Michgan to steal money from home care workers to fund her buddy turds in the Public sector unions.

Unions are about to be “blown away!”

[editor-surveyor]

Money laundering.

A racketeering criminal enterprise.
.