I was one of those who held my nose and voted for Romney as the lesser of two evils. I understand the sentiments of those here who refuse to vote for a Rino. But it is telling how many say we would be better off if Romney had won. I am not sure how I would answer that poll question myself. As bad as Obama is, we can no longer afford to allow liberals to run as Republicans and misrepresent what conservatism can accomplish.
Reagan is regarded as the best post WW2 president by most, and he was the most conservative. Conservatism works. Liberalism has lofty goals and dreams and ideas that can only be achieved (supposedly) if liberals get more and more power and spend more and more money.
Since USA Today is linked from the FR home page, I assume that a link to the article is okay to post here. If not, admin please remove.
USA was designed as a national newspaper.... not a ‘national liberal’ newspaper. Nice to see them living up to their founder’s dreams....
Krauthammer: ‘If Fences Don’t Work, Why Is There One Around The White House?’
USA Today was designed as a national newspaper.... not a ‘national liberal’ newspaper. Nice to see them living up to their founder’s dreams....
Krauthammer: ‘If Fences Don’t Work, Why Is There One Around The White House?’
CORRECTION: worst human being...
Wrong: Obama is the worst President in the history of the Republic. He has literally destroyed the USA, economically, worldwide and politically and has set African-Americans back 100 years!!!
LOL! Someone needed a poll to figure this out? Not to worry, it will be refuted and blamed on “tea baggers” stuffing the polls.
This America-hating Muslim has no business being referred to, discussed as or legitimized as what the traditional meaning of an American President is. An absolute shell.
This is what pi$$es me off so much when I hear ‘pundits’ like George Will, Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kristol or the like calmly talking about this man as “legitimate President” who, while playing the tyrant STILL has the best interests of this country at heart. BULL! They’re all just featherbedding opportunists in it for their own advancement.
For the first time, I agree with Obama on something.
PRESIDENTIAL RATINGS
It could be that these recent negative articles/polls are designed to push Hillary for 2016.
Can she run as an extension — Term 3 — of the Obama Administration? Is that what the Dems want to run on?
If not, they have to distance her from the ‘ills’ of the Obama Administration, so she can run as someone who will correct those ills. She had already hinted a few weeks ago that she would be running as an extention of the ‘successes’ of hubby BJ’s administration.
Will she be perceived as Obama Term 3 or Bubba Term 3?
Then you don't know how to to search. This is the 4th thread on this subject.
Yet even republican politicians characterize conservatives as 'extremists' these days.
Whenever Nixon’s name gets mentioned in discussions such as these, I feel compelled to remind people of a wee bit of history..... http://spectator.org/articles/59070/trey-gowdy-and-real-lesson-watergate
All you white libs who voted for the FBP to assuage your guilt got RIPPED OFF!
He/They still hate you.
Unfortunately, liberalism is the truest form of “talk is cheap”. They never deliver on the wonderful things, but accuse republicans of trying to take them away. We REALLY have an uneducated public that keeps on believing such crap.
Most young people today don’t know much history beyond the Clinton era so this poll is significant.
Too bad liberals are so stupid, egotistiscal and self centered or we might not be in the mess we’re in.