To: Viennacon
Supposedly, the Barbours wanted Cochran to win, then resign for health reasons and Barbour’s son would be appointed.
5 posted on
07/02/2014 12:37:46 PM PDT by
expat2
To: expat2
Supposedly, the Barbours wanted Cochran to win, then resign for health reasons and Barbour’s son would be appointed. That sounds about right - and then they'd have had 40 more years of the GOPe.
They're no better than the Clintons and Obamas - make deals for their own political power and screw the country. Hillary seems to be claiming it as a badge of courage that she lied because Obama made her and she didn't want to risk her career by telling the country the truth.
12 posted on
07/02/2014 12:42:35 PM PDT by
Aria
( 2008 & 2012 weren't elections - they were coup d'etats.)
To: expat2
There it is! I wondered why Barbour was so fired up for Cochran to win.
37 posted on
07/02/2014 1:23:34 PM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: expat2
Supposedly, the Barbours wanted Cochran to win, then resign for health reasons and Barbour’s son would be appointed. hmmph figures..
42 posted on
07/02/2014 1:44:04 PM PDT by
uncitizen
(Buckle up! We're on the Facism Fast Track!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson